It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
:)) Spot on!
Is it though—fine, I mean—if everyone walks away with different interpretations and none of them are even particularly funny? Except BeatlesSansEarmuffs' which I rather like, but which definitely is not what the filmmakers intended.
He walks in with a swagger that makes Daniel Craig look stiff, and whizzes around the room like he is on roller-skates.
And he has a really pompous face,attitude and voice - almost like he thinks he is 007.
He ALWAYS annoys me !!
There,rant over.
He's the best character in the whole film!
DAF is a film that lightens my mood. It's delightful nonsense.
I don't care what anyone says, I consider Elektra King to be both the main Bond girl and the main villain of TWINE. Christmas holds secondary Bond girl status (Cigar Girl holds tertiary status).
Similarly, the same can be said for Xenia Onatopp. She is both the secondary Bond girl as well as the henchwoman of GE.
Lastly, regardless of whether or not she became Moneypenny at the end of the film, I strongly believe that Eve holds the main Bond girl status of SF (Severine holding second, and Bond's Turkish lover holding third). Screw technicality, Eve (for the amount of time that we know her as such) is presented as the leading lady of the film, and thus should be considered the main Bond girl of SF.
*I think before I saw the film LALD proper, I assumed that Kananga and Big were two different villains, and not one and the same. I see this admittance coming from a lot of people, so that's reassuring.
*As much as I pride myself on being a fan of analyzing Bond films and writing essays on their subtleties and themes, I never made the connection that part of Camille's fear at seeing the flames in the hotel at the end of QoS was connected to flashbacks to her family's murders. I guess that the sink hole moment never clicked with me the way it did with others, so I never made that leap. I assumed that she was afraid simply to be burned alive. When I rewatched the film and heard the exact details of how her family died and how her home was burnt down, it then made sense because I was fully invested in it for the first time. It's funny that I have written endless pages on the stages of grief Bond goes through in the film and when he does it, but I miss that.
I'm struggling to come up with more examples, but maybe some will come to me later.
They were pretty up against it in that fire-trap of a hotel,so I can partly see why you would think that the 1st time.
But that's a good confession matey .
I love it when a Bond film makes you forget you're watching one, and you think Bond is a goner. That scene gives me that feeling too, as does Bond's on-the-knees surrender to Grant in FRWL, Le Chiffre's CR torture, etc. for a couple examples.
Yep, I thought he was a dead man too. Seeing that for the first time in the theater was an amazing experience.