It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
YOLT
SF over YOLT comfortably
OP vs TMWTGG: Love them both so it's a difficult choice. I think Roger Moore is in top form in both films, which are one-in from his first and last turns as oo7 respectively. He's his super suave trademark self in both, but is a little edgier in the earlier film, while a bit more relaxed and a cool veteran in the later one. Maud Adams nails her roles in both films. Barry's scores contain uncanny similarities in the key cue imho. I give OP the slim win on account of the excellent villain roster.
YOLT vs SF: The earlier film is a benchmark in terms of iconography. The volcano set and Pleasance's Blofeld have been imitated countless times by both EON and competitors since. Connery is in superb form in the earlier part of the film, effortlessly introducing us to exotic Japan while being his super cool self. Even though he appears a bit bored after Aki's death, it's still a decent performance. #11 is one of the best. SF also showcases Asia quite nicely during the Shanghai sequences. I'll give it the slim win here because it's one of the better films of the past 25 years while YOLT is probably the weakest of the 60's. I think it will go down as a classic (despite plot flaws) in time due to the characterizations and visuals. This film is elevated by the tension between M & Silva, the great interactions between cast and Bardem who is a throwback villain and one of the best. SF for the win.
Octopussy over TMWTGG.
YOLT v SF - Very tight. If we're voting on spectacle and production design it's YOLT in spades but as an overall film SF probably sneaks it as the first half of YOLT drags a bit. SF is beautifully shot and is a classy but flawed effort.
OP...barely.
OP beats TMWTGG 13-4
SF beats YOLT 11-6
Round 15:
OHMSS vs FYEO
and
FRWL vs TND
Pretty easy.
Connery s second is superior to Brosnan s second in every way.
FRWL and OHMSS.
TND over FRWL
OHMSS
&
FRWL
Very easy choices this time.
Next please.
FRWL vs TND - this one didn't really require much thought at all. FRWL. I hope I don't have to explain the obvious.
FRWL vs TND This one is easy for me.
FRWL
FRWL > TND
OHMSS crushes FYEO.
FRWL beats TND, although I must admit that I enjoy them almost equally.
FRWL wins by a landslide, I'm afraid.
Sums up my feelings well, though I still like TND. Just not nearly as much as FRWL.
Exactly, I like both FYEO and TND but I happen to love FRWL and OHMSS.
Yes, TND is enjoyable for me too. FRWL is my number 1 for a reason though.
OHMSS vs FYEO. No contest. John Barry beats Bill Conti. Savalas Blofeld easily beats Kristatos. The final 1/3 with battle atop Piz Gloria is vastly superior to the Meteora battle. Lazenby Bond/Tracy generate far more sparks than Moore Bond/Melina. FYEO attempts to be Moore's OHMSS but it simply does not come close to the 1969 007 adventure. OHMSS wins in a landslide(or should I say avalanche? ;) )
and
FRWL vs TND. TND is fast-moving fun and a Lewis Gilbert type Bond film for the Brosnan era and does feature David Arnold's best Bond score. But FRWL is a Bondian masterpiece. FRWL wins.