It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Paul Naschy plays Dracula, who here uses the alias Doctor Marlowe.
Seems like you are the only one who have seen them all.I like your enthusiasm.
Thanks! There are some newer ones I've missed. I haven't seen DRACULA UNTOLD all the way through or that series from a couple years ago with Jonathan Rhys Meyers. The one I want to watch sometime is Argento's DRACULA 3D with Thomas Kretschmann as the Count. As bad as I've heard it is I have a feeling I'd like it regardless.
Dracula Untold wasn't too bad either, though it's about as far removed from traditional Dracula as Star Wars is from Citizen Kane. If they had managed to kick off their "Universal Monster Universe" with this one, it might eventually have led us in the proper direction. As the standalone film it is now, it will be enjoyed by very few.
The Secret Service is involved in this one. From the Bond films, we recognize Joanna Lumley (OHMSS) and Patrick Barr (OP).
I think I have this one in a movie set (a collection of about 50+ B-films), but haven't watched it yet. Any good?
It's fun, though one could argue it doesn't feel like a Dracula movie. Even Lee himself thought the series had moved further and further away from Stoker.
Still I love it. Lee has a decent amount of screen time (once he shows up), he has a basement of female vampires, and gets quite a bit of dialogue in this one. He even pays tribute to Lugosi in one scene by doing an accent. Also it's the only Hammer Dracula film to feature a scene where Lee is not wearing his cloak.
IMO, Lee looked his best in his last two Hammer outings. The makeup and wig is consistent in the two films ad he looks imposing. Great to see Cushing again as well.
I'll say it again : the greatest virtue of Satanic Rites is to have Dracula work on a grand scheme. Just that makes the movie far closer to the novel than many, many adaptations.
Most public domain DVD transfers are not anamorphic so they really look crappy on a wide screen TV.
That wouldn't surprise me. The collection was very cheap, and I guess the image quality will look so too.
I love that theme. I like A.D.'72's music as well.
I love the fact that both of the "modern" Hammer Dracula's are completely different in feel and tone in spite of having the same director.
Here is an online review.
I'm a big fan of this one. I always loved Ingrid Pitt. When was a kid, though I was disappointed this wasn't another entry in the Lee series.
Frankenstein sounds like a jewish name. Was the monster a golem?
I did read the novel long before watching any of the movies. My favourite is the Karloff version from the 30s.
Actually that's another misconception: in the original novel it is not specified how the creature is made, although it seems he needs something from corpses. Frankenstein made the creature with harmonious features and body, after all. And unlike the golem he's not an automaton. More like an homunculus.
https://variety.com/2018/tv/news/claes-bang-dracula-bbc-netflix-sherlock-1203038682/