It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Bond killed Greene indirectly. Killed Blofeld metaphorically (XD). But only KILLED Silva. ;)
Hahaha that's more like it !
That's exactly how I see it.
That will definitely be shown at the end of the credits,i'm sure.
Also, why does Craig's Bond need to be 007 again at the end of the film? It's his last film? If you're worried about the "confusion" of James Bond will return because that seems like reaching to me, I'm sure we can make sense of that still appearing, because he will return despite whatever happens at the end of this film.
At this stage it’s impossible to know if we’re talking about lazy writing. If that’s her fate, she can die in a satisfying, brilliantly written way, as far as we know. Bond movies should have thought to their fans that “how” you present things is far more important than “what” you are presenting.
+1
You're both right.
I would make my judgement after I have seen the film, it could be well executed or not. We will see in April 2020.
She could turn out to be a 'Fembot'....oops sorry, wrong franchise!
@00Agent thank you 😊👌
@Denbigh I guess how you sell a main audience or audience at after 57 years tying Bond to 007 and the 007 trademark logo. You ask most people on the street and you say who is 007 they are going most likely say James Bond. If it is true I'm just wondering how they make everything work so it doesn't confuse people.
It won't confuse anyone. James Bond is 007; someone else taking on the number for one film -for one Bond film- doesn't change that.
Yeah I feel like they must know what they are doing This is how I kind of feel about the whole bickering just want to understand and be on the right side there isn't anything wrong about have a different opinion or being upset but if have made up their minds and just throwing in garbage because they are upset that's not ok either. I feel like a rope in tug of war I want to be on right side which is pretty much in the middle but a little bit on the right of center I can tolerate it and maybe I will like it who knows it's just like Spectres Blofeld or stuff I don't like how this have turn into a fake political mess where if you now people and media have turn into yeah female Bond Bond is now in the full feminist movement crap and the other one one little thing effects the future and the whole franchise is ruined or whatever and say I hate EON and Bond is dead or woke crap we just need to all calm down and go to the middle and have appropriate discussions and what not come together we all love Bond in the end of the day we have something in common I just hate this ripping apart on both sides and think that is what making me so anxious I think I don't know it's like wearing a political gear the media turned it into I shouldn't feel afraid to wear Bond gear I long for the day where just for putting on Bond gear I haven't made political decisions this isn't EONs fault it's the stupid media and there lies and tricks the media is like Blofeld who puts a piece of food in the fish bowl in from Russia all the media's goal is the destruction of Bond for some reason its been evident with their reporting on this film.
You're welcome :)>-
We just need more this more middle ground stuff because Blofeld must be controlling the media laughing in his chair stroking his cat saying if I can't destroy Bond I will create something so they destroy Bond for me mehaha ( cue the evil laugh) sounds more like Dr. Eggman from Sonic but whatever people get the point.
I call it common sense.
All this boycotting and whining to me just sounds like a serious case of self-victimization syndrome "Hollywood feminists are trying to steal my manhood!!!1!!" lol. It's paranoid gibberish from wannabe Internet-activists wearing tinfoil hats.
If you think Hollywood is trying to steal your masculinity, and you're seriously concerned about it, there's probably not much left to begin with...
Problem solved. No controversy. No accusations of pandering to neo-feminist #metoo anti-men lesbians! ;) This is a Bond film - who cares about gender equality. If you want gender equality go watch another film.
Eon should scrap the female 007 angle from the plot. No big deal. Rewrites are common. Scrap female 007 and everyone (bar a few feminists that are just pretending to like the franchise but in reality don't give a hoot!) will be happy. Bond is 007. PERIOD. Don't waste your time trying to convince us 007 is someone else. He's not. He's Bond. =D>
Or...
...not.
+1
I would much rather see a scene where M introduces Bond to the new 007 and he reacts like this:
Not gonna happen, but would be lovely lol.
Exactly the way I pictured it. Bravo.
Who dis?
Actors perform great reactions/actions when wonderful scenes are written (and directed); there was no context to Bond not liking C immediately (other than C was performed almost like a pantomime-- if he had a mustache, he'd have been twirling the ends)... So, quite frankly, that was a terrible scene in M's office. Daniel Craig, et al, did the best they could do with the material, and direction, they were given.
B25, with the three main script writers being Fukunaga, Burns and Waller-Bridge will absolutely have some of the most interesting scenes and storytelling we've seen in this franchise (yes, their input was certainly taken from the script originally written by P&W.... but, as I stated before, and I will say again with a little more gusto: apart from some story structure and a few action set-pieces, I guarantee that P&W will recognize the final product as a very, very, very, distant cousin-- so much has been altered and developed since January).
So when James Bond meets his successor-- the exact opposite of who he is in every way-- I expect fireworks (this idea, if from PWB, was ingenious and, in the right hands, will give many memorable scenes).
I would guess that when they meet in Jamaica Nomi is undercover and he has no idea she is a Double-O... When he meets her again in London, as 007, he will be slightly humiliated he was duped-- then he'll hafta overcome that his replacement is, well, not him...
I concur.
And she's clearly a better "secret" agent than he is ;) She sure made a fool out of him in Jamaica (just guessing here, of course).
So many interesting writing choices opened up with this 007 scenery. Hope the writing is brilliant in this one.
No, that sounds rubbish.
Once he gets her back to his place, she may admit that, yes, she was sent by M to find him-- but never once does she let on that she's a Double-O... And perhaps Bond thinks Nomi is, at first, like Fields. He goes to seduce her.... and ... is denied...
So when it's revealed she is 007 to Bond, the audience will already know, M knows, Nomi knows (of course), but Bond was fooled. He may take it with good, sardonic humour (but he will be miffed)