It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Good point! :) I suppose you are right.
I can see if it was the same actor playing the role in the three movies we might have got a harder hitting DAF. How cool would that be. More satisfying then Bond ramming the bathosub into the rig.
I think when you look at the three actors. Telly was the only one who could be in all three. He wouldn't need the scar to pull it off. Gray might be the second best to play in all three. Although the bobsleigh fight would need to look different. Finally Pleasance would be the least likely to be able to pull off the character in all three.
What about Max Von Sydow? Some applaud his portrayal of Blofeld in NSNA. What would he look like as Blofeld in 1967?
I can't really get behind Charles Gray. Good actor, but far too preening and posh for Blofeld. As the above poster said, Von Sydow would have been interesting, and probably able to pull off all three films to a degree.
Without some serious retconning in No Time To Die, I really can't count Bro-feld.
Savalas didn't come back because he wanted a massive salary that Cubby wasn't prepared to pay,alas.
Van Sydow has a cool voice but he looks similar to Jan Werich, the original YOLT Blofeld choice and therefore not really threateningly evil. I honestly don't think Eon has ever really gotten the character just right.
If you are talking in comparison to the books, probably not. But I still think Telly was superb. Charming, menacing, intelligent and still somewhat of a physical threat.
Yeah, he's my choice too as well as he combined it all.
I think Gray did have it in him to be a little more menacing then he turned out in DAF. I like those 2 scenes you mentioned. I also like how he handles Bond when he comes aboard the rig. "Really Mr. Bond, your puny little island hasn't even been threatened. Search him from the follicles on his head to his feet then bring him to me."
I do think the continuity would have helped the tension and storyline between Blofeld and Bond if the same actor had portrayed Blofeld. It might even had made the producers to dial down some of the campy scenes in DAF and go a little more hard edged.
On the other hand Pleasence returning I think would have at least really helped hammer how much DAF is NOT a follow up to OHMSS.
Okay off to another casting of James Bond! There are screen tests of both James Brolin and Sam Neill floating around the wonderful internet. Roger was making noises of not returning to Bond after FYEO. Cubby tested a few. Some reports say James Brolin was getting serious consideration. The screen test with him clearly has him using an American accent and not putting on a British one. Sam Neill was using his regular voice and so a Kiwi accent is used.
What if Roger wasn't lured back for OP? What casting choice do you think would have been a good one between the 2 actors? I know some Dalton fans will suggest him and that's fine, I am looking more for a discussion about the two actors who screen tested for Bond. What say you Mi6...Brolin or Neill starring as James Bond in OP? What effect would this casting have on the future of the franchise?
Yep. Brolin was bland beef and Neil, though an excellent character actor, didn't fit the part of Bond and didn't really want it. The public would have sensed all of that. And next to Connery, Brolin and Neill would have come off as pretenders.
I think everyone was sold on him except for Cubby. James Brolin, I believe was pretty close to getting the role for OP though.
Had Brolin played the part I have my doubts how well it would have turned out. I'm sure he would be better in the film than the screen test, but that's not saying much.
I believe you are right. The verdict still stands. Both wrong for Bond, and I doubt they would be a popular choice.
I saw the two different screen tests of Brolin's. One was the love scene from FRWL I believe with Maud Adams and the other a fight scene that hadn't appeared in a movie or even OP. He could handle himself in a fight. Just not sure there was good charisma there for the role.
I have to hand it to Roger for putting out signals he was done as he knew Connery's Bond was in the works and that Cubby couldn't go in with a new Bond in the battle of the Bond's. Wonder if Roger ever sent a gift over to Sean? LOL!
I really like Brolin's screen tests, as well as the interview with him on the OP Blu-ray. Fascinating how Cubby really pulled out all the stops, treated him like family when preparing him to potentially star in OP.
I love how Brolin purchased a few suits to take to the audition, and he looked quite dashing. His beige suit during the screen test with Vijay doesn't look too different from what Roger finally wore in the scene.
Maud Adams is particularly good with Brolin in the FRWL scene.
When comparing the brief clip with Neill, I'd say Neill actually looks more the part, though. Perhaps it's his haircut?
There's a spy thriller called HOSTAGE Neill did a few years later. Art Malik and Talisa Soto are both in it. Neill has some bedroom scenes with Talisa.
The movie itself I find a bit indifferent. Not particularly bad, but nothing too memorable. Does kind of give an indication what he might have looked like as Bond, though. I'm glad Tim got the role.
Do we think Brolin would have had longevity in the role or merely a placeholder till the next Bond came along?
He did kinda' get to be a secret agent when he played PW Herman in the film at the end of Pee Wee's Big Adventure.
I suppose Cubby could have been bluffing with Brolin just like Moore was bluffing about not returning to play Bond.
I very much doubt that. Filming those scenes took up a lot of time and money, and they hardly showed them to Moore.
But here's the thing that has always flummoxed me. For a brief period FYEO was at one point considered for the debut of a new actor. Ultimately, and to the relief of John Glen, it was decided Moore would come back and it may have been his final film. Then in OP they start seriously looking into new actors for the role, and the only reason Moore came back was so to give OP an edge against NSNA. You would assume then that OP would therefore become Moore's swan song. What better way to end your run then having your film beat Connery's at the box office?
As far as I have looked into, I cannot see any indication that EON was considered hiring a new actor for AVTAK. Not a word of that, let alone a test screening. So that begs the question... Why did EON go straight to Moore for AVTAK instead of looking into a new actor? Was this their way of performing a symbolic victory lap over having beaten NSNA at the box office? Moore was always willing to come back providing Cubby paid up, and Cubby clearly did. It was only months later after AVTAK that Moore had made it clear he was done once and for all.
IMO, AVTAK really should have been the debut of a new actor. I always imagined had Dalton been approached that we would have gotten this film but more in line with the tone of TLD. The comedic/camp elements would have been toned down considerably. Instead of having two old men fighting two equally old men in an underground facility "it's all wrapped up" we might have gotten a much more serious brawl out as we'd see in TLD with Necros.
Forgive the tangent, but Moore coming back for AVTAK has always been one of those big "WHY WOULD EON DO THIS?" questions for me.
I think it boils down to how well he would have been received. I can't see him lasting past the '80's but who knows?
I think signing Roger immediately after OP was kind of a celebration for not only beating NSNA, but OP becoming one of the biggest hits of '83.
I don't believe Tim would have wanted to do AVTAK since it was still firmly set in the Roger style. Pierce, on the other hand might have, but would still have the REMINGTON STEELE contract to deal with. I think an AVTAK without Roger would have had to be somebody else altogether.
And then likely come back from the dead. If films have proven anything it’s that no intellectual property will ever remain dead. Unless it’s THE LONE RANGER.