The What if NTTD is the last EON produced Bond film? page 62

1575859606163»

Comments

  • edited November 2 Posts: 4,108
    True. I’m sure they’ve had lawyers go through all of this and come up with precautions. I know in the days of CR’s rights being up in the air you have things like Miramax’s attempts to buy it prevented due to EON having a deal with the Fleming estate (which is where we get Tarantino’s ‘unmade’ CR which paradoxically was never planned so could never have been made anyway).
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,277
    mtm wrote: »
    My hazy understanding of copyright and trademark means I think that although CR may go into public domain, Eon/MGM’s indefinite trademark on James Bond 007 means that if anyone makes a version of CR which could be confused for being the work of the trademark holders (ie Eon) then they could be open to being sued. That’s pretty much the situation around early Mickey Mouse now he’s gone public domain: if you do anything vaguely Disneyish with him then they’ll come down on you as the trademark holders.
    And as Eon’s Bond films have varied in style so widely over the course of the series, that only really leaves room for wildly different interpretations like all-female musicals or zombie versions. I’m happy to be corrected, but I don’t think we’ll ever get non-Eon Bond films which are in the style of the films we’ve become used to, at least not until Danjaq/MGM give up their trademark on 007, and why would they.

    That's right.

    Plus, Disney makes *so* much money on the theme parks and merchandise that they come down hard on anyone who dares challenge them. Because Disney goes first in the timeline, Eon has the benefit of sitting back, watching Disney, and copying their legal tactics. If there's one thing MGW understands, it's the law.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited November 2 Posts: 16,344
    Yeah that's true, he's a lawyer isn't he. As HallY says, they'll have had teams of lawyers looking into this for years; if there's one thing they have it's lots and lots of money.
  • Posts: 15,106
    007HallY wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    I do think it's possible NTTD is the last Eon Bond film. If Barbara and MIchael were to sell to Amazon, I suppose there's a greater chance the franchise would go to streaming like that Beverly Hills Cop movie. I rarely watch straight to streaming content myself. For a new Bond I might, though. But to me streaming is the modern version of direct to video.

    I really don't feel like Barbara and Michael would sell Bond, though. They're very protective of Bond. Why let somebody else come in and screw it up?

    Barbara and Michael could just retire. I think enough time would pass that Bond becomes a beloved memory to the general public with a 59 year catalogue of films to enjoy.

    When the novels become public domain, someone could come along and do their version of CASINO ROYALE, whether it be released cinematically or made for streaming. Sure it wouldn't have the Bond theme, titles, gunbarrel, etc, but I doubt that would bother the general public as long as it's solid and entertaining.

    Thing is they are in the public domain in Canada and Japan. I think if it were going to happen it would have been attempted by now (the most we’ve gotten is an all female Casino Royale musical, which doesn’t clash with the films and is a nice Bond oddity. That and I guess a bunch of fan fiction being sold through Canada).

    Some Canadian director wanted to adapt FYEO, based on public domain laws. Not sure where that project went, if anywhere.
  • Posts: 1,971
    None of the film elements identified with an official EON Bond will go into the public domain. The logos, gun barrel, music, are copyrighted and/or trademarked. They'll become part of the package sold to whomever takes over.

    It's possible once the novels enter the public domain, a Bond purist might want to make a Bond film true to a novel and not worry about the familiar elements we associate with an EON production. Those elements are pretty well baked in. It would be like a Stars War film without the Star Wars theme.

    Without the traditional elements we identify with an EON Bond film, we'll end up with something along the lines NSNA. Not a bad film really, it just didn't feel like a Bond film even with SC.

    We'll reach a point where there are so many Bond novels of wildly varying quality, Bond will cease to be unique.

    So maybe this long pause is more than about Bond 26.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited November 2 Posts: 16,344
    CrabKey wrote: »
    It's possible once the novels enter the public domain, a Bond purist might want to make a Bond film true to a novel and not worry about the familiar elements we associate with an EON production.

    As per the above, it’s unlikely for the reasons we set out. Danjaq/MGM would likely have a legal case even after the copyright runs out due to their trademark on the character.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,277
    It would have to take a creator with deep pockets to take on Eon and Amazon in court.

    With NSNA, McClory et al had those deep pockets but they also had an enforceable legal agreement from 1965. And critically, they had Connery.

    Could, theoretically, someone try to do a faithful film adaptation of CR? Sure.

    But every element of that film will be scrutinized by copyright lawyers, and anything that looks like it comes from an Eon film--or even a Fleming novel that has not yet passed into the public domain--will be scrubbed.

    You thought the NTTD delays were long? Just wait.
  • edited November 2 Posts: 1,324
    They could make "The son of James Bond" or something like that.

    Anyway, the Bond theme can't save them forever. These elements are a creative prison for EON.

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,344

    Anyway, the Bond theme can't save them forever. These elements are a creative prison for EON.

    What on earth does that even mean.
  • Posts: 1,324
    mtm wrote: »

    Anyway, the Bond theme can't save them forever. These elements are a creative prison for EON.

    What on earth does that even mean.

    You can't be fresh if you depends on the brand.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited November 2 Posts: 16,344
    dungeons-and-dragons-dungeon-master.gif

    Sure
  • Posts: 1,324
    Feeding the Aston Martin brand is already a creative prison.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,604
    Feeding the Aston Martin brand is already a creative prison.

    Not really. It's just something that comes back every now and then for Bond.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,404
    The tropes of a Bond movie are many. The producers have played with them through the years to varying success. In some ways tropes are wonderful because they are familiar beats that the audience look forward to. The Gunbarrel start, the provocative opening title sequence, the Bond theme, etc. But they can also give the whole thing a paint by numbers feel.

    To the question at hand. Based on the treatment of IP by other companies I do wonder if Bond would be Bond. EON does know what the audience wants and does their darnedest to deliver. They made adventures that demanded the big screen. If they go, does the new company want to narrow the scale? Do they want to create a "universe" of which Bond is a character within? I think it raises enough questions for me to say I hope NTTD is NOT the last EON produced Bond film.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,556
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Feeding the Aston Martin brand is already a creative prison.

    Not really. It's just something that comes back every now and then for Bond.
    It comes back every now and then in every consecutive film since GoldenEye. The fact is some of us are tired of seeing the Astons, as lovely as they are. The films went a whole era without said brand and got by just fine. It would be like having Felix Leiter in every film or visiting a casino in every film. Some are happy to lap that up, some see the monotony.

    You can bet the next era will see Bond taking a *ahem* back seat while an anthropomorphic spy car goes on his own adventures, finding himself in cross country races and chasing sporty female Astons. Returning in Deebie: Rather Stocked Fully Loaded; Deebie Goes to Monte Carlo (again); Deebie goes bananas etc. (this last one is the revenge sequel after Deebie's love interest gets drowned by the evil Jag with the eyepatch)

    And yes, I will happily continue to buy the toy Astons released with each new film!
Sign In or Register to comment.