It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Are the filmmakers including Craig and Cary inspired enough to put something else on the table, to go ahead with a sixth mission for Craig? Anything is possible. Will Cary be interested in directing the introduction of the next Bond actor is another question.
But that's getting way ahead of events. First, No Time To Die.
The first Fast and Furious film created and ending such that th 4th film carried an air of melancholy similar to QoS. Brosnan's films didn't get unpopular because of GE, it's because all of his subsequent films carried through a careless light predictable tone which never made the darkness of LTK and Dalton's influence get any sequel acknowledgment.
The producers love Vesper and Quantum and Camille as much as many of us fans do. And they know the dark films really help the series out.
People went to go see the 2nd and 3rd Fast and Furious movies because they wanted to see whatever followup they could get from the bits and pieces left behind by the family-centric characters of outsiders which resulted in tragedy by the end of the first film. While both the 2nd and 3rd movies did not serve as neither direct nor good sequels, fans were cheering to see Vin Diesel back even for just a cameo at the end of the 3rd film which saved the series from becoming direct-to-dvd. Vin Diesels' reluctance to return to the role after the first film for fear of typecasting parallels Daniel Craig's reluctance at doing more Bond movies. He's mentioned that he would regret letting go of the Bond franchise if he does it too soon and yet he's given the studios concern by wanting to depart.
With DC saying that he doesn't care who replaces him and that he doesn't want to direct, really makes it feel like a real death. He might even go as far as telling reporters that he hasn't watched the subsequent films if he lets go of the Bond role. Similar to Vin Diesel's reluctance, it doesn't mesh very well with fans. It will become polarizing for the future of the films because I know I don't want to see someone who doesn't care as much as DC about the script, about the character developments, about the grittiness and things that have made the series more interesting since CR. It would be as though we'd be fools for having watched the progress made from CR to now after wasting my money on the ticket for DAD in 2002.