It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Lots of wonderful iconography, beautiful set design, and some superb individual moments, but it's not my favourite Rog (that's a toss up between LALD and OP these days). I think Stromberg has a lot to do with it - one of the most memorable villain lairs in the series somehow gets designated to one of the dullest villains. That said, I'll always watch it and enjoy it when it's on.
And I love "Bond 77".
I don't consider it as groundbreaking as many others do, but I really like it nonetheless. I'm siding with @echo here, while I like GF, TSWLM and to a lesser extent SF, I prefer entries that are maybe less iconic but certainly more engaging, like OHMSS or LTK.
Same here to be honest.
STARRING
Sean Connery as James Bond 007
WITH
Ursula Andress, Joseph Wiseman, Jack Lord & John Kitzmiller
DR. NO
MUSIC BY Monty Norman
DIRECTED BY Terence Young
(the Italians released DN as Licence to Kill, that's why later on LTK was released in Italy as Vendetta privata, aka Personal Vendetta)
DN's best placement was 2nd, on three occasions. That makes DN the highest ranked entry without a gold medal.
Additionally it reached n. 3 on one occasion, n. 4 on two occasions and n. 5 on five occasions. Six more top 10 spots were rewarded to it, all of those were inside the top 7. Another six top 15 spots were secured as well.
Only one bottom 5 place occurred, which was a 21st spot, its lowest ranking.
DN collected 180 points in total.
True.
DN's showing is quite good nonetheless. Personally it usually falls just outside my top 10, but always in the top half. A cracking entry for sure.
It’s also remarkable how many things associated with the series that is set right from the very start.
I admire it rather than like it. It was Bonds debut after all, and it changed a lot. It broke ground among 'kitchen sink' dramas of the time!
But I dont watch it very often, usually when its on T.V. Actually think the novel is more entertaining!!
Still, a respectable position!
The movie is actually my favorite Connery, but the book is criminally underrated! It's my second favorite Fleming novel, but I feel it's little discussed.
I do wonder what a John Barry score could do for this movie. Monty Norman's orchestral cues are uniformly terrible: the histrionic accompaniment to every fight sounds like we're witnessing the invention of punching. It's the film's only negative point for me.
Here as well!
Certainly nothing wrong with that. I just find it baffling.
I see, you think my decision is ridiculous. No problem for me ;) I love both movies.
No knock on DN – it is a fine film and I really admire the choice to introduce many of the Bond characters in mid-flight (i.e., no boring origin story). Its’ just that I think there are eleven films that are better.
Now, as for this GE vs. DN debate…….you guys are killing me =))