It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
A Brosnan WARHEAD might have been interesting, providing McClory wasn't married to the concept of Michel Legrand scoring. Imagine had McClory and Pierce pursued their own Bond films during the 6 year gap. I have a feeling it might have been successful during that time as many audiences in the States weren't exactly warming to Tim.
Great interview!
Is it even possible that GoldenEye wouldn't have been successful with another actor in the lead? Could him not doing the McClory film have saved the whole series?
:D
I think it's interesting that he wanted the job so much that he actually tried to make it happen off his own back.
https://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/articles/opinion_kevin_mcclory_damaged_the_james_bond_series.php3?t&s&id=03599
That would have been interesting: An unofficial Bond film starring Brosnan and co-written by Connery.
I wonder. He makes it a point to say "we went to Kevin" and seems proud to admit that he wanted to give Broccoli a run for his money. Based on what I've read, Brosnan was unhappy making TND -- he clashed with Roger Spottiswoode and hated the last-minute rewrites during production (pages were being delivered to the cast minutes before the scenes were shot). Also, from what I remember, he was making comments to the press that suggested his ideas about the direction of the franchise were being shot down by EON (out of all the Bonds, he seems to have had the least amount of control after Lazenby). So basically I think there was a mild resentment toward his employers even then.
This reminds me how much uncertainty of Bond's future there was during the 6 year hiatus. At one point Cubby did put Bond up for sale briefly. Had Pierce and McClory produced their own 007 film at that time Bond's screen future might really have been different. I'm grateful the sale never materialized. I remember Joel Silver talking about pursuing the Bond film rights and casting Mel Gibson for his Bond.
I wonder how far Pierce and McClory got before realizing the amount of legalistics /paperwork was too much to make the project worthwhile?
I think McClory would have kept pushing if Brosnan hadn't backed out. Remember, even during the Brosnan era McClory wanted to get Dalton to do a Bond film with Sony.
With Tim's loyalty to the Broccolli's I imagine it was a very short discussion with McClory, if it even got to that point.
I do wonder what working with McClory on a Bond project must have been like? Certainly his eagerness would have been prominent. I get the impression that the constant back and forth leading to nothing would have turned many people away from him.
It's amazing Connery actually had the patience to stick NSNA out through to the end considering the hassles involved.
I think this was more of a comment on the film's troubled shoot. The producer, Jack Schwartzman, spent much of his time in court defending the production against Broccoli's army of lawyers. As a result, Connery (together with Irvin Kershner) picked up a lot of slack and became the de facto producer, which he hated.
I don't think he's seeming too ashamed of it there to be honest, and I don't think it's a bad thing really. He obviously was very keen to be Bond and it speaks of his willingness to get into producing films a bit more. In a way it's kind of funny that they let Craig into that side of things more than they did Brosnan, who ended up starting his own production company and getting a couple of hits under their belts.
Wow is that right? I didn't know that.
Yes indeed: you can even imagine another studio picking it up from Cubby and making a new series with Brosnan in the lead continuing after this Never Say Never Again Again movie.
That's a world I'd enjoy living in.
In August of 1990 Cubby put Danjaq up for sale. One of the recent James Bond and Friends podcasts goes into it a little bit. Eventually UA negotiated with Cubby and Barbara and Michael then took over as producers.
Well that's the business, it was nothing personal I'm sure. And I'm not sure I'd be all that happy about anyone flying 5,500 miles just to say they won't be hiring them- that's a hell of a carbon footprint! :)
That's not the whole story.
In Some Kind of Hero, Brosnan admits that Barbara seemed very emotional and even cried when she was giving him the decision.
Also, there was a meeting over lunch following that phone call in which Brosnan tried to persuade Barbara and MGW into keeping him on for one more Bond movie and giving him a pay raise. Of course, they refused. I mention that because it seems to be widely believed the phone call was the last of their conversations about Brosnan's dismissal, and that doesn't appear to be the case.
From what I've read, Cubby wanted Dalton to return. The decision to re-cast was made by Cubby under pressure from the executives at MGM/UA, who wanted Brosnan.
I know that Dalton has said that he only wanted to do one more film (which did not align with Cubby's wishes) but I think they would have come to an agreement had MGM/UA not intervened.
I'm amazed that didn't persuade them! :D
Sure but I guess thedove means Cubby picked him for Daylights. After he originally picked Dalton, or whatever the story is! Must be nice to know you were second choice after Tim Dalton twice :D
It does give one a sense of Brosnan's level of arrogance, doesn't it?
But what he neglected to mention -- or maybe doesn't know -- is that Dalton was the first choice but couldn't be available because of his commitment to BRENDA STARR.
So yes, it seems that @mtm is correct about Brosnan being EON's second choice both times.
Correct, and that's why the casting of Bond was done so late in the process. They couldn't get Dalton, so they had to keep looking and Brosnan was selected. Then the NBC contract came up and Cubby famously said "Remington Steele will not be James Bond". Because of that, production had to be postponed so they could have time for another actor. It's because of that postponement that Dalton was actually available to get the gig. Of course, Brosnan made a lot of fuss over it on the press and a lot of American audiences that had grown to the idea of Brosnan for Bond didn't give Dalton a chance. I don't blame Brosnan for being upset, as that renewal of RS didn't even amount to anything as the ratings went down after it became apparent Brosnan was not Bond.
I've always wondered about that particular version a bit though: it's the Eon party line and I always feel like it's there to make Dalton sound like the first choice. But neither The Making of TLD book nor Some Kind of Hero have it that way round, although the latter has Dalton say that Broccoli approached him for drinks in '86 to ask if he'd like to do it but he's busy with West End plays. Dalton had long been on their radar and obviously one of several they'd approached about being the fourth Bond but I do tend to think Brosnan was the first guy they actually hired. Maybe I'm wrong and their version is true, but it always sounds a bit neat and flattering to Dalton! :)
There's a photo of Brosnan signing the contract next to Cubby and MGW, but it's not certain if that was legit or staged. But yeah, they were ready to go with him.
The GOLDENEYE Wikipedia page claims that Paul McGann (a wonderful actor who is probably best known as the eighth incarnation of Doctor Who) was the "studio's original choice" for Bond and "would have been cast only if Brosnan had turned down the role." I spoke to McGann at a convention about this -- he laughed and told me it was not true and that he never even tested for the role.
Yeah it's just if you watch the documentary on the DVD or the Everything Or Nothing documentary film (I think) they very much play up that Dalton was definitely the guy they were going to go with and then he became unavailable and they went with Bros, but I don't know if it definitely happened that way.
Yeah that sounds total nonsense. Cubby had a big thing about height apparently: even Mel Gibson was too short for him so I don't see him going for a titch in his mid-twenties like McGann.
I think everyone who makes it to the level of stardom has a certain amount of ego. So why not ask for more money...it would be weird to me if he asked them for one more and said he'd take less.
I compared a couple of the books on this the other day. It seems they were testing prospective Bonds from February or so 1986, the Broccolis had a drink with Dalton in 'spring' but he said he was tied up with theatre productions, in May 'Remington Steel' was cancelled and it seems Brosnan was pretty much signed up around that time, NBC picked up 'Steel' in July and Brosnan was out, Dalton then screentested in 'summer' and was hired.
I tend to think Brosnan wasn't their second choice at all but just the man who was there. They were always interested in Dalton but that wasn't a straight-up offer, I don't think.
For Timothy Dalton, his Brenda Starr role played into his deferred commitment. Then Brosnan was approached and was available, then not. By that time Dalton was. So Dalton was the bookend for who got the Bond contract. Timing is everything.
On the other hand and looking at the bigger picture, timing wasn't so much on Dalton's side after all. And Brosnan was definitely a player.