It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Connery
X
Craig
That's true, there was a time when I wasn't a fan of George (or the the film itself). I guess that I have learned to appreciate that while George wasn't very experienced as an actor, and it shows at times, but he had the confidence, he looked the part, and he played Bond very close to the source. And with further films, he couldhave grown in thr role, shame we never got to see that.
Roger Moore over Timothy Dalton
Daniel Craig over Pierce Brosnan
Why do you feel he is better than Sean though? Especially early Sean?
Agreed. Lazenby was the definitive Fleming Bond and Connery was the definitive cinematic Bond, IMO.
You can always count me on defending George's honour.
For me I think it was actually Craig's debut performance in CR that helped increase my appreciation for Lazenby's work and for OHMSS. When CR was new I found myself drawn to watch and rewatch OHMSS a lot since I see them as companion pieces much like I see TLD and FRWL as companion pieces.
I love OHMSS and George did a great job.
But with that very odd accent and silly walk, he isn’t Fleming’s Bond for me. The film in general is a first class adaption though.
The better films in general then. 👍
I find Connery's best to be Thunderball, although Dr. No and From Russia With Love round out my 3 favourite Connery Bond films. Young definitely took the ideas that formed Fleming's Bond and sexed them up for the cinema. I'd argue that Lazenby was closer to Fleming than Dalton, IMO. However, your comment regarding the era of their respective films and therefore the "Flemingesqueness" of Dalton's performance not being as emphasised as Lazenby's is an interesting discussion.
Good post and agreed. But I think Connery was ‘the first rate movie Bond’ in the first 4 films.
Dalton
Craig
Dalton over Moore
X (not fond of either of the two)
Good points. Definitely agree about Dalton and that the world around the Bond character/actor would have to be pure Fleming which definitely puts Brosnan and Craig at a disadvantage in that particular area.
Agreed. Connery's Bond was at his apex in TB.
Agreed.
Dalton beats Moore 15-9
Craig beats Brosnan 21-3
Round 3 of 5:
Sean Connery vs Daniel Craig
George Lazenby vs Roger Moore
Timothy Dalton vs Pierce Brosnan
Moore over Lazenby
Dalton over Brosnan
Moore
Brosnan
Moore
Dalton
Moore
Dalton
Moore (Hard)
Brosnan (Less Hard)
Rog
Tim
They're the work of Pat Carbajal.
Moore
Dalton
Lazenby
Dalton
Moore
Dalton
Roger
Tim