› ›

Is the Bond franchise a zombie?

13»

Comments

  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    Posts: 12,837
    Samuel001 wrote:
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    Samuel001 wrote:
    RogueAgent wrote:
    the bond franchise is the third most successful after Star Wars and Harry Potter.

    It's second. After only Harry Potter.

    I hate star wars (even the original ones), and the harry potter films are horrible. Luckily now harry potter has stopped bond has a chance to reclaim his top spot.

    By then, Avatar will be top but only for a while.

    crap I forgot about avatar. Stupid cameron had to go and make sequels. I thought the first one was boring and overrated, so I don't have much intrest in 2 more.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,356
    Bond will forever be challenged at the top spot but he'll regain it soon and we hope for a long time!
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    think thats a given if they turn one out every two years? [-O<
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,356
    Of course but that'll never happen all the time, sadly.
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    agreed, but hopefully whilst DC is in the role? it will happen for the next 4 or 5 years?
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,356
    You'd hope so, there's going to be a strong push for that to happen.
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    Absolutely! Especially after missing out on one possible outing in 2010?
  • bondboy007bondboy007
    Posts: 267
    I love CR and GE, enjoy watching TND and QoS and can sit through TWINE better than half of the action movies out there today. DAD's obviously terrible, but with the excitement CR brought, and the news we've gotten so far with SF, I don't think this franchise is a 'zombie' at all.
  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 11,425
    bondboy007 wrote:
    I love CR and GE, enjoy watching TND and QoS and can sit through TWINE better than half of the action movies out there today. DAD's obviously terrible, but with the excitement CR brought, and the news we've gotten so far with SF, I don't think this franchise is a 'zombie' at all.

    Zombies can still be exciting...
  • fire_and_icefire_and_ice
    edited April 2012 Posts: 6,432
    GeorgeLazenby wrote:
    It died in the 80s, went Zombie in the 90s/early 00s and was reborn in 2006.

    I agree, the PB era was a drop in quality regarding script and director and also cast IMO. There has been a upward turn with DC, there are many pluses with DC though i do feel he lacks in charm and charisma compared to some of the other bond actors, though he is good enough for now. P.s. i like GE and feel the movie gave the franchise a shot in the arm.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,359
    DAD would have been better, and arguably more believable, with zombies.
  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 11,425
    echo wrote:
    DAD would have been better, and arguably more believable, with zombies.

    A Bond vs Zombies spin-off... may be we can bring back PB after all.
  • VirageVirage
    Posts: 1,856
    Uck! hate Avatar
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    Samuel001 wrote:
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    Samuel001 wrote:
    RogueAgent wrote:
    the bond franchise is the third most successful after Star Wars and Harry Potter.

    It's second. After only Harry Potter.

    I hate star wars (even the original ones), and the harry potter films are horrible. Luckily now harry potter has stopped bond has a chance to reclaim his top spot.

    By then, Avatar will be top but only for a while.

    crap I forgot about avatar. Stupid cameron had to go and make sequels. I thought the first one was boring and overrated, so I don't have much intrest in 2 more.

    It doesn't count a franchise it must be good, IT ISNT!!!

    I really hope Avatar 2 and 3 bomb. no, Nuclear Bomb.
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    echo wrote:
    DAD would have been better, and arguably more believable, with zombies.

    DAD would have been more believable had Bond gone through the entire movie with that Jesus-beard he was sporting after the title sequence.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited May 2012 Posts: 15,722
    Avatar's next films will be in 2014 it seems..... until then Bond will be at B24... besides if we look at Bond's box office inflation adjusted, it will take more than just 2 Avatar sequels to beat 007.... given how slow the films seem to be made, Avatar 3 will be in the late 2010's... Bond will have amassed another few $500 000 000 with B25 and B26... and Bond #7 will probably have debuted by the time Avatar 3 is in theaters.... so IMO it's not with 1 film every 5 years that Cameron will beat Bond.....

    This is Bond's box office adjusted for inflation to 2011 values :

    1. Thunderball 1965 Sean Connery $1,014,941,117
    2. Goldfinger 1964 Sean Connery $912,257,512
    3. Live and Let Die 1973 Roger Moore $825,110,761
    4. You Only Live Twice 1967 Sean Connery $756,544,419
    5. The Spy Who Loved Me 1977 Roger Moore $692,713,752
    6. Casino Royale 2006 Daniel Craig $669,789,482
    7. Moonraker 1979 Roger Moore $655,872,400
    8. Diamonds Are Forever 1971 Sean Connery $648,514,469
    9. Quantum of Solace 2008 Daniel Craig $622,246,378
    10. From Russia with Love 1963 Sean Connery $576,277,964
    11. Die Another Day 2002 Pierce Brosnan $543,639,638
    12. Goldeneye 1995 Pierce Brosnan $529,548,711
    13. On Her Majesty's Secret Service 1969 George Lazenby $505,899,782
    14. The World is Not Enough 1999 Pierce Brosnan $491,617,153
    15. For Your Eyes Only 1981 Roger Moore $486,468,881
    16. Tommorow Never Dies 1997 Pierce Brosnan $478,946,402
    17. The Man with the Golden Gun 1974 Roger Moore $448,249,281
    18. Dr. No 1962 Sean Connery $440,759,072
    19. Octopussy 1983 Roger Moore $426,244,352
    20. The Living Daylights 1987 Timothy Dalton $381,088,866
    21. A View to a Kill 1985 Roger Moore $321,172,633
    22. License to Kill 1989 Timothy Dalton $285,157,191

    That's a total gross of $12,713,060,216 as of 2011.

    compared to Avatar's $2,782,275,171... it will take 4 Avatar sequels to reach Bond, only if Bond doesn't make any sequel until....... 2029 at the rate the Avatar films are made.
  • SaintMarkSaintMark
    Posts: 7,653
    I find that Bond has little in common with any other franchise except that folks seem to enjoy the franchises for their own reasons.

    I would not mind seeing a decent Tarzan series, a Saint series, a few more MI movies, the next Avatar, looking forward to Prometheus (part of the ALien series).

    ANd when I am sitting watching Prometheus in the cinema I will not be bothered to think about another franchise. I actually like the diversity of franchises and I will watch any that attract my interest.

    The best ones imho are:
    Tarzan series (Weismuller)
    Thin man series (Powell and Loy)
    The Falcon series (Sanders & Tom Conway)

    to name a few
  • TracyTracy
    Posts: 1,713
    How bout a decent Phantom movie :/
  • Baltimore_007Baltimore_007
    Posts: 5,634
    I wouldn't mind a sort of Zombie theme mission for Bond, I know such a thing seems doomed to failure, a sort of 28 days later James Bond thing where Craig goes up against the undead or something, just seemed like an interesting concept for a moment there. We did come close in a sense with Live and Let Die, a sort of supernatural element, voodoo etc and sort of vague subject matter and if they could enhance on that any time I for one would welcome it, but it seems unlikely
Sign In or Register to comment.