It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The bit I always remember is how he gives a kind of synopsis of the bike chase rather than actually writing it. “The cycle soared out and onto a boat tied at the dock. From there they jumped to the next boat, and then the next”
It doesn’t exactly make me feel like I’m there! :)
It doesn’t exactly make me feel like I’m there! :)[/quote]
Personally, I don’t think Benson is any kind of writer unless he’s improved since scribing the Bond yarns. They are colourful but ultimately read like “fan fiction” to me and I’m not the sort of person who just assigns anything that isn’t attributed to Fleming into such a category.
Just like George Lazenby not being an actor Benson wasn't really a fiction writer. Zero Minus Ten (1997) was his first work of fiction. Benson had however written the non-fiction book The James Bond Bedside Companion (1984/1988) which helped him get the Bond continuation gig and like anything he got better the more novels he wrote.
It was a bit crazy. I think they'd have been better off going the route of other fan stuff like Star Wars etc. and having a rotating band of writers making them rather that giving the job to just one guy. I recently re-read Forever and a Day on holiday and then skipped to a Benson and there was just no comparison: Horowitz is a professional and very solid writer and Benson just wasn't.
I think their relaunch with top name writers was a great idea for the brand though, regardless of how well we thought they all turned out.
I think their relaunch with top name writers was a great idea for the brand though, regardless of how well we thought they all turned out.[/quote]”
I like to look at the whole celebrity author writing stint as an experiment to find the right man :) and in my mind, they certainly have in Horowitz. I’m not the sort of person who likes to get my hopes up too much but it’d be great if he went on and on... As this is his third (a mere trilogy?) and it’s set at the end of Fleming’s series, I guess it could be his last but I’ll try not to think about it. :). I’m confident that the new one will be another triumph.
Forever And A Day, albeit another great read, was a bit of a strange one for me. It read somewhat like a young bond novel, mostly in terms of Bond’s character. I guess this somewhat stands to reason what with Bond’s lack of experience and freshness.
I hope in the new one that H will make Bond a little more opinionated in typical Fleming style, even if it’s just in the form of inner monologue.
There were two lines - one in TM and one in FAAD that didn’t sit well with me. In terms of the former, it was when Galore made the remark of Bond going off to save the world and in the other, when Bond was on heroin and said something like, “I’m James Bond of the secret service and I have a license to kill!” Too cheesy and played in the movie world. Still, I guess if you’re on the narcotics...
I have a feeling Horowitz might be three and out as he's put them at the beginning, middle and now end of Fleming's stories, but they may well persuade him to do more.
Personally I'd still like Charlie Higson to have a crack at some point.
Yeah, true. Her recommending him use the cigarette case was fine but as for the other things, I agree, he should have decided on these other items through his own experience.
Charlie Higson? Yes. Me too.
I think that was IFP's way of returning to the old Glidrose idea for the late 1960s and into the 1970s of having different authors write under the umbrella pseudonym of Robert Markham. This initial idea was discarded after the first novel in the proposed series, Kingsley Amis's Colonel Sun (1968), didn't sell as well as was hoped, not to mention the adverse critical notices. I think the "Celebrity Authors Trilogy" of Faulks, Deaver and Boyd was an attempt to return to the "famous author writing one Bond novel each" idea which was ditched after Colonel Sun. The selection of Sebastian Faulks (and to an extent William Boyd) were IFP's version of hiring an author of the calibre of Kingsley Amis to write a Bond novel.
After this three book experiment IFP decided to hire long-time Bond fan Anthony Horowitz to write a new series of Bond novels following the John Gardner approach that you need a proven thriller writer to write Bond thrillers. The added bonus of unused Fleming Bond material being included in the books has certainly helped cement Horowitz's place as a legitimate literary heir to Fleming. It gave Horowitz an advantage that none of the other Bond continuation authors up to then had had. It was also useful to have Fleming's name on the cover as a sort of co-author from a marketing hype and sales point of view.
Those were the two bits that didn't sit well with me either. I think there was also another moment in TM were it highlights Bond being the good guy hero. I cannot remember the exact phrase used now, or where it appeared, but again it was too cheesy and belonged in Movie Bond world.
Sounds a bit like the way Craig Bond sometimes holds back from an outright kill in the contemporaneous Bond films. Perhaps those have been an influencing factor on the Horowitz novels as well as Fleming's novels? Every Bond continuation novel from Colonel Sun onwards has been published with the shadow of the Bond films hanging over them so even if it is only subconsciously they are bound to have some influence on the novels. Even Fleming's novels were being influenced slightly by the films by the end too so its all pervasive.
I think that Sixtine was Horowitz’s version/answer to Vesper/Tracy.
Fleming's Bond doesn't kill if he can avoid though, does he? I'm sure I remember him talking about how he doesn't kill in cold blood.
Possibly, and she was a brilliant character to be honest: I really enjoyed her in it otherwise.
It is indeed, after the killing of the capungo. Roger Moore said he'd read this passage and that it was his entry key into how he played the Bond character in his films.
either way I prefer the novels take place in our current time I wouldn't mind if Fleming's novels took place within the last 10 years from now whenever now is and 40 year old 007 is fighting whatever new threat is here.
This is why I liked Carte Blanche a lot. For three main reasons: First, it was the first James Bond novel I ever read. Second, it’s the only one set it’s present time for the last 15 years of books. Fleming’s books weren’t period books when they were written. Third, all those recurring supporting characters used feels like an author could take them further to the future with more books set in the present. I know my thoughts are considered controversial, but the material is there if they wanted it.
110% I want bond in the modern age
Indeed. It was the perfectly serviceable means of providing new Bond novels for the first forty years of the continuation. I suppose the point of changing to period-set Bond novels was that the literary Bond was seen as an anachronism in the age of the iPhone but the same could be said of the 1980s and the brick-like mobile phones of that era and that seemed to work fine.
I’m not adverse to a Bond novel set in modern day but the author would have to be relatively faithful to the character unlike Deaver who transformed Bond into someone who was virtually unrecognizable. A contemporary Bond doesn’t have to be a chauvinist, not that I’ve ever felt that Fleming’s Bond was too guilty in this area anyway (I remember a comment in one of the books where Bond was internalizing how women should be at home with their pots and pans or something like that) but for my ideal modern Bond he would still have to be flawed to some degree. For example, I see no reason why a contemporary Bond couldn’t drink a bit too much every now and then and having maybe one or two cigarettes on some evenings as they relax him in a psychological capacity. In terms of the booze, look at Thor in ‘Avengers: End Game’. LOL. I don’t think Bond should drink to the point where he becomes fat of course though and he needs to keep up with the exercise obviously. Plus, he is not actually a superhero. :) In regard to the smokes however, unfortunately I just can’t see it happening. Even though these are ‘adult’ Bond books, kids will read them.
Also, if they were novels where feminism was blatantly shoved down our throats then I’d stay away from them. I’ve never fully understood all these feminist oriented comments time and time again by women playing Bond girls in the newer films. There are some tough girls, mentally (they don’t always have to be physical equals as this just isn’t realistic), in the Fleming books. I’m reading Diamonds Are Forever again which is set in the fifties and damn, that Tiffany Case is a tough lady. She is even patronizing towards Bond and he takes it all in his stride.
my issue with Deaver's Bond is he wasnt willing to sleep with a girl because she had a Fiancé
I would prefer a Bond who is willing to sleep with any girl who wants him
As for Bond and smoking, drinking, using drugs, etc. -- Bond used drugs in Fleming's novels. Fleming's Bond clearly has an addictive personality / addiction genes. He does not merely drink, he drinks a LOT. He does not merely smoke, he's a smokestack. He uses various drugs regularly. He is so unbridled in his pursuit of women -- Gala Brand excepted -- that, were someone to have done all that in actuality, he'd have contracted numerous STDs over the years, and spread them around, for that matter. But he's pretty a super-man, so it all works out ok. It's tied to real-world elements, but at its heart the Bond story-telling is fantasy. The man men want to be, and the man women want.
I want bond to sleep with the attractive girl sorry but I do.
I would almost prefer any of the authors in this list of horowitz.
Quote
Hmmm...Irma Bunt ? Rosa Klebb ? This is the part where you say that by "girl" you meant a lady of or about Bond's age or younger-but-within-reason.
As for a villain-not villain differentiation, sometimes, Bond cannot yet tell the lady's true inclinations, or even is convinced she is on the same side as him, but turns out to have been wrong.
At any rate, Gala Brand was true blue, and, though she found Bond attractive, did not really "want" (as in, "hubba-hubba ! let's get buck wild !") him, as she genuinely was in love with her fiance. By the way -- her fiance, if I recall correctly, was serving in Her Majesty's military. That sort of thing matters in Bond's views.
sigh not to play too much of my hand but when I read fiction and the writer describes this beautiful amazing woman and the hero doesn't sleep with her I am annoyed.
trust me before I was married I knew MANY girls who were attractive who I could never date I dont need to see that same dynamics in fiction.
I am sure many will read between the lines but yeah I am who I am