It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The whole "who is the villain?" Him or Colombo, didnt really work! My last few viewings of FYEO, have been really positive, lots to enjoy, but alas, the main bad guy isn't one of them!
I love Kristartos and I love FYEO. He may not make a huge impact or have any particularly noteworthy scenes when it comes to him properly being unveiled as a villain (the attempted drowning sequence, perhaps), but he's understated and a man with a very unique, passionate hobby while simultaneously trying to screw over everyone else for his own gain. Plus, Julian Glover is a phenomenal actor.
FYEO is a Bond film I really enjoy, despite Kristatos I should say. I've got nothing against him, but I've got nothing "for" him either. It certainly doesn't help that we are initially led to believe that he's our ally. I suppose that, in turn, is very much to Topol's favor, who instantly attracts our attention so much more as the potential villain.
Glover is a competent actor, but I thought him rather bland as the bad guy (with another ruse) in Indy3 and also underwhelming in Ep. V. There's just something extremely common about him, his motives, how he dresses, talks, ... That said, he works in this film, which clearly abandons the larger-than-life section of villains and enters the realm of normal people. As with pretty much everything else in FYEO (post-PTS, that is), Kristatos is down to Earth, "realistic" and plausible. I also rather like the fact that he and Columbo have this decade-old feud going all the way back to WWII.
Except that it is, well, a Bond film, and while I admire FYEO for pulling Bond back down from space and away from the realm of big, megalomaniac archnemeses, Kristatos is a tad too simple for my liking. It doesn't help his case that he seems a little "interested" in Bibi, and not in a perfectly parental sort of way. What's more, I don't like the accent Glover tries to do. I get that the character is Greek... but that hard "r" of his keeps me distracted.
Locque, Kristatos, and a bunch of young Greek fellas form a pretty weak collection of baddies in this film. Nothing particularly colorful about them. Erich Kriegler is okay, I guess. This, in my opinion, is something both OP and AVTAK will improve on. However one feels about the films, at least the villainous bunch stands out a little more in both cases.
JOE DON BAKER
as Brad Whitaker
in THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS
Given the difficulty I had to find an illustration for Baker's first appearance in the world of 007, it might not be all that much of a surprise that he rounds out our bottom 5.
Two penultimate places, and eight more bottom 5's give him little to cheer, though he did feature in two top 10's (one 7th and 8th spot) and two more top 15's (one 13th and one 15th place).
Brad Whitaker achieved a total of 78 points.
Similar for me. Number 19, and I too love his confrontation with Bond.
I think there was a lot of potential in a cowardly, blowhard arms dealer like this, but Koskov got all the screen time. Oh well. I still like him well enough.
I certainly prefer Baker here than as that awful Jack Wade character!
It's the mark of a great series that so many of us can have Kristatos and Whitaker in the 20s and still say, "They're not bad." :)
same with the films, yeah. You could put a film at #24 and still say "however although this film is the weakest, it still has many redeeming qualities like..."
I'd even go a bit further, with his pantheon of 'surgeons', his hobby to replay old battles 'as he would have fought them' and his obnoxious tastelessness (look at how he attacks that lobster), he is more in the spirit of a Fleming villain than anything that happened in either SF or SP. That's just my opinion of course, so no offense intended of course.
Whitaker came in at 7 for me, his highest ranking.
I can totally imagine Fleming writing a short story with a Whitaker-type. His speech about "society's dead flesh" absolutely sounds like a literary original....