› ›

Rank the 5 Daniel Craig Bond films (no discussion, just list)

1…89111314…17

Comments

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    I'll never forget seeing it in theaters opening night, sitting next to my high school crush in the front row the whole time and not caring about her presence at all because I was so blown away by what I was watching. All this talk has me wanting to rewatch it.
  • FoxRoxFoxRox
    Posts: 12,473
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I'll never forget seeing it in theaters opening night, sitting next to my high school crush in the front row the whole time and not caring about her presence at all because I was so blown away by what I was watching. All this talk has me wanting to rewatch it.

    Planning on it tonight to kick off my Bondathon!
  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    edited May 2022 Posts: 1,033
    Ok SILVER Medals!

    CR: 30
    QOS: 36
    SF: 58
    SP: 8
    NTTD: 36


    Stay tuned for the Bronze medals. (also what do we call 4th and 5th place?)
  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    Posts: 1,033
    And the BRONZE Medals:

    CR: 15
    QOS: 24
    SF: 47
    SP: 27
    NTTD: 57
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 7,134
    Junglist_1985 wrote: »
    Stay tuned for the Bronze medals. (also what do we call 4th and 5th place?)

    4th place can be honourable mentions, and 5th place just bottom finishes I guess ;)

  • Some_Kind_Of_HeroSome_Kind_Of_Hero
    Posts: 6,844
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Junglist_1985 wrote: »
    Ok did a rough count, here are the GOLD medals:

    CR: 119
    QOS: 4
    SF: 27
    SP: 3
    NTTD: 20

    I’m including all the lists, even duplicates with minor changes, bc I don’t have enough time. Will post the SILVER medals soon.

    Who else has QoS as #1 alongside myself? I went through and saw @Thunderfinger and @M_Balje had listed it, didn't go back far enough to see the fourth.

    I haven't done a ranking here, but QOS is also my favorite of Craig's. Brilliant film.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Junglist_1985 wrote: »
    Ok did a rough count, here are the GOLD medals:

    CR: 119
    QOS: 4
    SF: 27
    SP: 3
    NTTD: 20

    I’m including all the lists, even duplicates with minor changes, bc I don’t have enough time. Will post the SILVER medals soon.

    Who else has QoS as #1 alongside myself? I went through and saw @Thunderfinger and @M_Balje had listed it, didn't go back far enough to see the fourth.

    I haven't done a ranking here, but QOS is also my favorite of Craig's. Brilliant film.

    That's what I like to hear!
  • Some_Kind_Of_HeroSome_Kind_Of_Hero
    Posts: 6,844
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Junglist_1985 wrote: »
    Ok did a rough count, here are the GOLD medals:

    CR: 119
    QOS: 4
    SF: 27
    SP: 3
    NTTD: 20

    I’m including all the lists, even duplicates with minor changes, bc I don’t have enough time. Will post the SILVER medals soon.

    Who else has QoS as #1 alongside myself? I went through and saw @Thunderfinger and @M_Balje had listed it, didn't go back far enough to see the fourth.

    I haven't done a ranking here, but QOS is also my favorite of Craig's. Brilliant film.

    That's what I like to hear!

    CR had the benefit of working directly from Fleming, but I feel that more so than anyone Forster really got the essence of Bond. He delivered an excellent blend of Fleming Bond and movie Bond and also got out of Craig his best performance in the part. I could quibble about a couple action scenes being edited a tad too frenetically, but when it comes down to it, out of Craig's five films, this is the Bond I want to see more of.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    edited May 2022 Posts: 40,976
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Junglist_1985 wrote: »
    Ok did a rough count, here are the GOLD medals:

    CR: 119
    QOS: 4
    SF: 27
    SP: 3
    NTTD: 20

    I’m including all the lists, even duplicates with minor changes, bc I don’t have enough time. Will post the SILVER medals soon.

    Who else has QoS as #1 alongside myself? I went through and saw @Thunderfinger and @M_Balje had listed it, didn't go back far enough to see the fourth.

    I haven't done a ranking here, but QOS is also my favorite of Craig's. Brilliant film.

    That's what I like to hear!

    CR had the benefit of working directly from Fleming, but I feel that more so than anyone Forster really got the essence of Bond. He delivered an excellent blend of Fleming Bond and movie Bond and also got out of Craig his best performance in the part. I could quibble about a couple action scenes being edited a tad too frenetically, but when it comes down to it, out of Craig's five films, this is the Bond I want to see more of.

    Absolutely, which explains my disappointment after wholeheartedly loving QoS in 2008 and waiting four years for something entirely different in SF. QoS was everything I wanted from the series and wasn't ready for something so jarringly different only one film later.
  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    edited May 2022 Posts: 1,033
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    CR had the benefit of working directly from Fleming, but I feel that more so than anyone Forster really got the essence of Bond. He delivered an excellent blend of Fleming Bond and movie Bond and also got out of Craig his best performance in the part. I could quibble about a couple action scenes being edited a tad too frenetically, but when it comes down to it, out of Craig's five films, this is the Bond I want to see more of.

    Yes!!! Couldn’t agree more.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    edited May 2022 Posts: 6,304
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Junglist_1985 wrote: »
    Ok did a rough count, here are the GOLD medals:

    CR: 119
    QOS: 4
    SF: 27
    SP: 3
    NTTD: 20

    I’m including all the lists, even duplicates with minor changes, bc I don’t have enough time. Will post the SILVER medals soon.

    Who else has QoS as #1 alongside myself? I went through and saw @Thunderfinger and @M_Balje had listed it, didn't go back far enough to see the fourth.

    I haven't done a ranking here, but QOS is also my favorite of Craig's. Brilliant film.

    That's what I like to hear!

    CR had the benefit of working directly from Fleming, but I feel that more so than anyone Forster really got the essence of Bond. He delivered an excellent blend of Fleming Bond and movie Bond and also got out of Craig his best performance in the part. I could quibble about a couple action scenes being edited a tad too frenetically, but when it comes down to it, out of Craig's five films, this is the Bond I want to see more of.

    It helps that it's the shortest. But I think it's also the one of Craigs I've rewatched the most--equal parts frustrating and invigorating. With better editing and perhaps fewer action scenes, I'd rank it higher. The dramatic scenes are some of the best in Craig's run.
  • FoxRoxFoxRox
    Posts: 12,473
    QOS felt very Fleming to me. The brief moment with Greene talking to Camille about his childhood crush felt like a classic little flavor of wild villain background in a book.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 3,152
    Watched CR on UK tv two nights ago. Never gets old.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited May 2022 Posts: 3,152
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    my disappointment after wholeheartedly loving QoS in 2008 and waiting four years for something entirely different in SF. QoS was everything I wanted from the series and wasn't ready for something so jarringly different only one film later.

    Same. Still remember the sinking feeling I had when I first heard they were going for gags and a lighter feel in Bond23! In the end, most of SF wasn't as bad as I feared, but it was such a big drop off from QOS. My biggest regret of the whole series is the retreat back to more familiar, safer territory after QOS. 'QOS was everything I wanted from the series' - couldn't agree more.
  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    Posts: 1,033
    Ok FOURTH Place “Honorable Mentions”:

    CR: 6
    QOS: 50
    SF: 26
    SP: 47
    NTTD: 35
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited May 2022 Posts: 3,789
    QoS FTW!
    I feel like SF is starting to get underrated these days, yes, critically, it's overrated but many fans are bashing that movie. Even in the MI6 favorite film thread, no one's voting for SF, the position for SF was still clear of names.
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    Posts: 5,185
    1. SF
    2. NTTD
    3. CR
    4. QoS
    5. SP

    Love them all.
    Almost feel like switching out QoS and CR, but would feel weird to have CR so low.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    CR
    QoS
    SF

    NTTD
    SP
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    MI6HQ wrote: »
    QoS FTW!
    I feel like SF is starting to get underrated these days, yes, critically, it's overrated but many fans are bashing that movie. Even in the MI6 favorite film thread, no one's voting for SF, the position for SF was still clear of names.

    Funny how time works, isn't it? I know not everyone participates in those but I'm surprised just how few people give upvotes to SF/Mendes in certain games.

    @Venutius, couldn't agree more!
  • Agent_Zero_OneAgent_Zero_One Ireland
    edited May 2022 Posts: 554
    I can see the flaws in SF more clearly now (the biggest one IMO being the immediate jump from the end of QoS where Bond has finally become "half monk, half hitman", to him being a long serving veteran who might be past it), but I still massively enjoy it. I can forgive the plotholes it's littered with because I have such a great time watching it, from start to finish.
  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    Posts: 1,033
    Ok and 5th Place “bottom spot”:

    CR: 3
    QOS: 50
    SF: 12
    SP: 85
    NTTD: 22
  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    Posts: 1,033
    FINAL RESULTS!
    (by how many votes at each spot)

    Casino Royale:
    1st - 119
    2nd - 30
    3rd - 15
    4th - 6
    5th - 3

    Quantum of Solace:
    1st - 4
    2nd - 36
    3rd - 24
    4th - 50
    5th - 50

    Skyfall:
    1st - 27
    2nd - 58
    3rd - 47
    4th - 26
    5th - 12

    Spectre:
    1st - 3
    2nd - 8
    3rd - 27
    4th - 47
    5th - 85

    No Time To Die
    1st - 20
    2nd - 36
    3rd - 57
    4th - 35
    5th - 22
  • BirdlesonBirdleson
    Posts: 2,161
    That does seem to be the way it’s cemented itself around here.
  • MalloryMallory
    Posts: 2,165
    1. Skyfall
    2. Casino Royale
    3. No Time To Die
    4. Quantum of Solace
    5. Spectre
  • Scaramanga1974Scaramanga1974
    Posts: 728
    Casino Royale
    No time to Die
    Skyfall
    Spectre
    Quantum of Solace
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    It really does seem like SP is regarded as the weakest of the era then. That's nice to see.
  • Some_Kind_Of_HeroSome_Kind_Of_Hero
    Posts: 6,844
    Junglist_1985 wrote: »
    No Time To Die
    1st - 20
    2nd - 36
    3rd - 57
    4th - 35
    5th - 22

    Regarding whether or not No Time to Die is divisive on here, I think this spread says it all.
  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    edited May 2022 Posts: 1,033
    NTTD and QOS are the most polarizing it seems…

    CR is a straight line up.
    SP is a straight line down.
    SF peaks at #2 then steadily runs down.

    Interestingly, QOS has more #2 votes than #3 as its fans (like myself) are quite passionate.

    NTTD is a perfect triangle.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    They're rather connected, so I gotta go for
    No Time for Solace at SPECTRE's Skyfall Casino
  • Max_The_ParrotMax_The_Parrot ATAC to St Cyril’s
    Posts: 2,426
    1 NTTD
    2 SF
    3 CR
    4 SP
    5 QOS
Sign In or Register to comment.