It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
It's all good.
This.
+1
MI:3 gave the series heart and made Ethan a three dimensional character.
With that said , future films wisely did not iwallow in the personal aspects, as some other franchises have done.
[/quote]
Re: Number three: My thoughts to a "T", @talos7 ... It's the only one I actually remember. The others are like fast food: in they go, out they go.
When I get this on Blu-Ray the helicopter finale will be mandatory daily viewing for me! :)
I'm not sure I see it as representing the direction Bond should go but the stunt work was amazing and the contrast with how London was used in Fallout versus SF and SP was striking. in Fallout London felt like a three dimensional place whereas Mendes use of it was totally lacklustre.
I have to say there were a few moments where I felt Fallout was riffing off recent (and older) Bond films. the bit where the helicopters crash seemed very reminiscent of the alpine plane crash in SP. and the villain escape from the sunken van has been done so many times now - good to see LTK still being ripped off all these years later. even the skydive made me think of TND although the Fallout one is done so much better.
loved the used of the old school nuclear bomb plot - still seemed to be in goood working order to me!
It had the kind of frenetic nonstop action vibe that I actually don't want to see in a Bond film. But since it was an MI film I was fine with it.
I think you'll find that trick was first used in a film called Licence to Kill in 1989...
This is the way formula should be done in today's day and age. It unabashedly references prior eras (and scenes) while embracing modernity and feeling fresh/contemporary.
The same thing was done by Nolan in TDK/TDKR. Both those films and Fallout make one leave the theatre with the feeling of the past, when things were done for real with stuntmen rather than computer generated crapola. There's no better feeling.
I wish B25 will have also those numbers, but it's more than unrealistic after the Chinese Box-Office from SF and SP
Because Chris Nolan invented t-boning vehicles in film.
You can't really win when it comes to making action films these days. As long as the action is exciting and sucks me in, I don't particularly mind whether it was done before.
This is the opposite of my experience with SP for example, where I was aware that a scene was attempting to evoke a prior Bond sequence (plane chase similar to Lotus chase for example), but it just felt inferior and less thrilling. Hence I was disappointed and taken out of the proceedings.
Again, just my take on it.
The action is great, the photography is beautiful, but I can't love a movie so silly and poorly written but at the same time so serious in tone.