Mission: Impossible - films and tv series

13536384041306

Comments

  • edited June 2015 Posts: 11,119
    I don't know what it is, but I prefer this poster over the new "Mission: Impossible" poster:

    hr_Skyfall_63.jpg

    And in a way, I also prefer this one over the new "Mission: Impossible" poster:

    Casino%20Royale%20Poster%203.jpg

    Why? Because these two posters don't use too much action sequences. They both are utterly stylish, they keep it simple, NOT boring, and they ooze a bit more mystery.

    My favourite "Mission Impossible" poster so far, has been this one:

    MI4-Ghost-Protocol.jpg

    It's very stylish, it oozes some Arab/Exotic atmosphere. I love the sand colors.
  • Posts: 12,837
    @Gustav That Skyfall poster is horrible imo. Seriously, that was the final poster for the 50th anniversary film. It's so uninspired and boring (and misleading, as the classic gunbarrel seen in the marketing was nowhere in the actual film). The CR one is ok but, like with Skyfall, Quantum and SP, the teaser was a million times better (that seems to be a trend for the Craig era, great teaser poster, then a bunch of substandard posters leading up to release).

    I don't like the Ghost Protocol one either. Seems really generic and dull. The new MI poster is alright, I like how it actually conveys a sense of action and excitement. The teaser poster was better though imo, where it showed him hanging off the plane.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    There is no poster "art" anymore. Cut and paste, cut and paste, cut and paste........
  • Posts: 12,526
    talos7 wrote: »
    There is no poster "art" anymore. Cut and paste, cut and paste, cut and paste........

    It is too easy! I loved the sketch type posters of the earlier Bond movies!
  • Posts: 11,119
    talos7 wrote: »
    There is no poster "art" anymore. Cut and paste, cut and paste, cut and paste........

    There is, but one then has to visit arthouse movies in smaller theatres a bit more often. The problem is, not all poster art lends itself particularly well for action oriented movies:

    the-grand-budapest-hotel.jpg
    Melancholia+poster.jpg
    7-Men-Women-and-Children.jpeg
    33-No.jpg
    iv.jpg
    under_the_skin_us_poster.jpg
    Big_Moon_revised.jpg
    The-Tree-of-Life_f6fe92e1.jpg
    tsfs_ukquad.jpg
    magnolia-poster.jpg
    image.jpg
    Snoopy_%2526_Charlie_Brown_Pel%25C3%25ADcula_Nuevo_Poster_Latino_JPosters.jpg
    little-children-movie-poster-2006-1020395311.jpg
    MPW-57145
    B6rqrIAIIAELhx3.0.jpg
    2010-poster01.jpg
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    Ah, I should have put "with some exceptions" ;)
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited June 2015 Posts: 4,537
    1002004011897060.jpg
    Mi4

    If there are to much cast members
    the-world-is-not-enough.jpeg

    1002004012341861.jpg9200000026168185.jpg
  • Posts: 11,119
    talos7 wrote: »
    Ah, I should have put "with some exceptions" ;)

    I saw all of them @talos7, except the ones that still need to be released :-). All of them are cinematic gems or jewels.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    I wouldn't consider 'The Grand Budapest Hotel' or 'Under the Skin' action-oriented at all. The former fits the director's usual motif, in fact.

    As for that 'Ant-Man' poster, that's a mess no matter what genre film it is. Lazy marketing.
  • Posts: 11,119
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I wouldn't consider 'The Grand Budapest Hotel' or 'Under the Skin' action-oriented at all. The former fits the director's usual motif, in fact.

    As for that 'Ant-Man' poster, that's a mess no matter what genre film it is. Lazy marketing.

    What I meant to say was this: Usually the most beautiful movie posters aren't action blockbusters. Take the poster for "The Grand Budapest Hotel". It simply wouldn't work to just have the Casino Royale on front of a poster in a similar kind of way.

  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    I disagree.
    ZU437cH.jpg
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    There is no reason why Bond can't have great posters. Period.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    RC7 wrote: »
    There is no reason why Bond can't have great posters. Period.

    Indeed! The ones for Skyfall were very weak.

  • Posts: 6,432
    Prefer cinema art posters myself, Rogue Nation poster looks like many other generic posters.
  • Posts: 12,837
    Thanks for that @Murdock. Did you make that? It's great, mysterious, creative, a million times better than the crap we've gotten for posters since LTK (there have been some exceptions though, like the CR teaser poster, and I'm fond of the GE one too). I wish we could have something like that advertising SPECTRE instead of just literally Bond standing against a plain background.

    @Gustav_Graves I wouldn't call The Interview a "cinematic gem". Honestly the whole Sony hack fiasco was the best thing that could've ever happened to that movie because it generated loads of buzz and interest for what was actually a pretty shit film. And I didn't go into it expecting another Team America like some people did either, I wasn't expecting hard hitting satire or anything. I knew it was gonna be a dumb comedy, but based off the people involved and the films they'd made in the past (Superbad, Pineapple Express, This Is The End, all great) I was expecting it to actually be a funny dumb comedy, and it wasn't. Very disappointing film imo.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    @thelivingroyale, Yes I did make that. Thank you. :)
  • Posts: 11,119
    Murdock wrote: »
    @thelivingroyale, Yes I did make that. Thank you. :)

    It's actually wonderful @Murdock. I think you should do something more with that talent.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    Thank you @Gustav_Graves. I've been trying to make a career out of it but I've been so busy with other things lately. I have more Bond related posters here. Some aren't my best, but it was a fun project none the less.
    http://comandercool22.deviantart.com/gallery/44051049/James-Bond-Posters
  • Posts: 5,767
    Murdock wrote: »
    I have more Bond related posters here. Some aren't my best, but it was a fun project none the less.
    http://comandercool22.deviantart.com/gallery/44051049/James-Bond-Posters
    @Murdock, man, you got style! \m/
  • Posts: 6,432
    @murdock cool posters mate, the two Dalton ones standout for me.
  • Posts: 3,278
    aaron819 wrote: »
    Bond has an atmosphere and a dramatic and great story. MI films don't have atmosphere and the story comes to be boring.
    MI:4 Ghost Protocol had twice as much atmosphere and drama in the Moscow and Dubai settings, than SP had in China and Macao.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    From my perspective, MI4 was action, action, action, although all of it was very well done.

    I personally found SF to be more atmospheric than all the MI films except for De Palma's first, but then for me, atmosphere is bordering on noirish.....with a quieter, less frenzied feel, and more obvious, deliberative, framed compositions, something I thought SF gave us courtesy of Deakins.
  • Posts: 11,119
    bondjames wrote: »
    From my perspective, MI4 was action, action, action, although all of it was very well done.

    I personally found SF to be more atmospheric than all the MI films except for De Palma's first, but then for me, atmosphere is bordering on noirish.....with a quieter, less frenzied feel, and more obvious, deliberative, framed compositions, something I thought SF gave us courtesy of Deakins.

    I fully agree. I mean, "Skyfall" has a certain 'atmosphere' that makes me rewatch the film over and over again. I simply don't have that with the "Mission: Impossible" films.
  • edited June 2015 Posts: 3,278
    Yes, the blue neonlit Shanghai and brownish Macao, give SF a great atmosphere. But for me - that's only icing on the cake.

    Look at how well they handled Shanghai in MI:3 for example, and compare with SP. Except some establishing shots, every single scene in SF is shot back in the UK. I kind of expected more, when the news about "Bond will go to China" broke, at the SF press conference.

    I don't want the Bond-movies to turn into a Pinewood backlot series. I want Bond on real locations. Like Ethan Hunt.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited June 2015 Posts: 23,883
    Zekidk wrote: »
    Yes, the blue neonlit Shanghai and brownish Macao, give SF a great atmosphere. But for me - that's only icing on the cake.

    Look at how well they handled Shanghai in MI:3 for example, and compare with SP. Except some establishing shots, every single scene in SF is shot back in the UK. I kind of expected more, when the news about "Bond will go to China" broke, at the SF press conference.

    I don't want the Bond-movies to turn into a Pinewood backlot series. I want Bond on real locations. Like Ethan Hunt.

    Fair points. I think there were some budget issues with SF, after QoS didn't do so well (from a net margin perspective). If I'm, not mistaken, SP will deliver with location work.

    BTW - I still think Shanghai was done better in SF (in terms of the way they used the limited location work to best advantage.....sort of a 'less is more' kind of thing). I just really was immersed in the atmosphere of it all more in SF.

    Having said that, I think TDK did Hong Kong better than either SF or MI3 did Shanghai.
  • aaron819aaron819 Switzerland
    Posts: 1,208
    New TV Spot:

  • Posts: 11,119
    aaron819 wrote: »
    New TV Spot:


    Hmmm.....action, action...and action. "Furious 7"-esque action ;-). Should be a lot of popcorn-fun.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    And a lot of dollar dollar bills.
  • Posts: 11,119
    doubleoego wrote: »
    And a lot of dollar dollar bills.

    I think it's my age, but I'm looking more forward to "UNCLE" and "SPECTRE". Don't understand me wrong, I'm gonna like this film! But, well, I dunno...
  • Posts: 669
    Has anyone else noticed that they are billing this as an action film, and yet all the action in any of the trailers/TV spots comes from about two scenes? There's the big car/motorcycle chase and then a couple fistfight/scuffles (at the opera and when Ethan is tied to the chair). This does not look like an action-heavy movie AT ALL, and yet that's how they're marketing it. I have a feeling this is going to be more of a spy/espionage movie but the studio is afraid that won't get butts in the seats, so they make it look like an action film.

    I could be wrong, of course!
Sign In or Register to comment.