› ›

Mission: Impossible - films and tv series

1…4445474950…306

Comments

  • JWESTBROOKJWESTBROOK
    Posts: 5,745
    thelivingroyale wrote: »
    I think what @JWESTBROOK meant is the initial reaction. There was nothing but praise for SF in the first few weeks of release, and those on here that did say they didn't like it were immediately jumped on (I loved Skyfall and still do but I found the reaction from some members, refusing to accept any criticism and desperately trying to justify anything wrong with the film, pretty stupid).

    Since then the hype has settled down and negative opinions of SF have gotten more common, and become more accepted.

    @thelivingroyale Actually this is exactly what I meant.

    So @Zekidk if you could kindly open your mind to actually interpreting and understanding what I am saying, either properly analyzing my words and meaning and not just jumping to the first conclusion your mind can muster, or just act like everybody else and move on without giving two thoughts and looking for way to be offended - instead of lecturing and demanding me on what I can and do speak of - it would be much appreciated. Thank you.
  • smittysmitty
    edited August 2015 Posts: 725
    I think the problem with any negative reaction to a hugely popular film is kind of normal. A smaller success will usually have an audience that digs the director or the stars or the writer and is more likely to like the film on initial and delayed viewing or reviewing. The problem with a huge billion dollar success is that just about everyone sees the thing, and lots of that audience aren't Bond fans, or interested in the actors, or the director or whatever. The audience numbers are so vast, a certain percentage just won't like it and that percentage, even if relatively small, is still large given the size of the general audience. Some of that percentage is going to be vocal posting about not liking the film, or at the least, will note that it was not so great. So I think the negative reactions to SF are kind of typical for hugely popular films. We could probably see the same reaction for all of the recent top grossing films. I had my own problems with the film which I've noted enough.
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    smitty wrote: »
    I think the problem with any negative reaction to a hugely popular film is kind of normal. A smaller success will usually have an audience that digs the director or the stars or the writer and is more likely to like the film on initial and delayed viewing or reviewing. The problem with a huge billion dollar success is that just about everyone sees the thing, and lots of that audience aren't Bond fans, or interested in the actors, or the director or whatever. The audience numbers are so vast, a certain percentage just won't like it and that percentage, even if relatively small, is still large given the size of the general audience. Some of that percentage is going to be vocal posting about not liking the film, or at the least, will note that it was not so great. So I think the negative reactions to SF are kind of typical for hugely popular films. We could probably see the same reaction for all of the recent top grossing films. I had my own problems with the film which I've noted enough.

    You hit the nail there ;-). Fully agree with your assessment :-).
  • SpectreNumberTwoSpectreNumberTwo
    edited August 2015 Posts: 389
    “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”

    I don't think there is such a thing as a perfect movie with no flaws at all, chinese proverb perfection is a road not a destination.
  • ZekidkZekidk
    edited August 2015 Posts: 3,278
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    thelivingroyale wrote: »
    I think what @JWESTBROOK meant is the initial reaction. There was nothing but praise for SF in the first few weeks of release, and those on here that did say they didn't like it were immediately jumped on (I loved Skyfall and still do but I found the reaction from some members, refusing to accept any criticism and desperately trying to justify anything wrong with the film, pretty stupid).

    Since then the hype has settled down and negative opinions of SF have gotten more common, and become more accepted.

    @thelivingroyale Actually this is exactly what I meant.

    So @Zekidk if you could kindly open your mind to actually interpreting and understanding what I am saying

    Like "everybody drooled over SF"? Not some people, or most people but e.v.e.r.y.b.o.d.y?
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    just act like everybody else and move on

    You really like using the word "everybody".

    But I "moved on" the second I hit "post comment." Can you?

    Hence the many SF-threads some people just have a hard time dealing with the fact, that a lot of people - even though a minority - thought SF was a real stinker. Back to MI.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    Once again, this is a thread for the new M:I film, not one for SF or SP. We have plenty of threads on those, so please take the arguments on that elsewhere and keep this one on topic.
  • ZekidkZekidk
    Posts: 3,278
    Paramount Pictures Vice Chairman Rob Moore, confirms that MI:6 is "already in development."
    http://www.ibtimes.com/mission-impossible-6-rob-moore-confirms-plans-movie-after-tom-cruises-announcement-2037462
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    MI6 is always in development.
  • JWESTBROOKJWESTBROOK
    edited August 2015 Posts: 5,745
    Zekidk wrote: »
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    thelivingroyale wrote: »
    I think what @JWESTBROOK meant is the initial reaction. There was nothing but praise for SF in the first few weeks of release, and those on here that did say they didn't like it were immediately jumped on (I loved Skyfall and still do but I found the reaction from some members, refusing to accept any criticism and desperately trying to justify anything wrong with the film, pretty stupid).

    Since then the hype has settled down and negative opinions of SF have gotten more common, and become more accepted.

    @thelivingroyale Actually this is exactly what I meant.

    So @Zekidk if you could kindly open your mind to actually interpreting and understanding what I am saying

    Like "everybody drooled over SF"? Not some people, or most people but e.v.e.r.y.b.o.d.y?
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    just act like everybody else and move on

    You really like using the word "everybody".

    But I "moved on" the second I hit "post comment." Can you?

    Hence the many SF-threads some people just have a hard time dealing with the fact, that a lot of people - even though a minority - thought SF was a real stinker. Back to MI.

    @Zekidk Next time move on before boring me with your feelings.

    And I'm excited for MI6. There. On Topic.
  • ZekidkZekidk
    edited August 2015 Posts: 3,278
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    Zekidk wrote: »
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    thelivingroyale wrote: »
    I think what @JWESTBROOK meant is the initial reaction. There was nothing but praise for SF in the first few weeks of release, and those on here that did say they didn't like it were immediately jumped on (I loved Skyfall and still do but I found the reaction from some members, refusing to accept any criticism and desperately trying to justify anything wrong with the film, pretty stupid).

    Since then the hype has settled down and negative opinions of SF have gotten more common, and become more accepted.

    @thelivingroyale Actually this is exactly what I meant.

    So @Zekidk if you could kindly open your mind to actually interpreting and understanding what I am saying

    Like "everybody drooled over SF"? Not some people, or most people but e.v.e.r.y.b.o.d.y?
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    just act like everybody else and move on

    You really like using the word "everybody".

    But I "moved on" the second I hit "post comment." Can you?

    Hence the many SF-threads some people just have a hard time dealing with the fact, that a lot of people - even though a minority - thought SF was a real stinker. Back to MI.

    @Zekidk Next time move on before boring me with your feelings.
    You just couldn't let it go, and move on, without delivering a final insult could you?
  • smittysmitty
    Posts: 725
    Zekidk wrote: »
    Paramount Pictures Vice Chairman Rob Moore, confirms that MI:6 is "already in development."
    http://www.ibtimes.com/mission-impossible-6-rob-moore-confirms-plans-movie-after-tom-cruises-announcement-2037462

    Every film with a studio hoped for follow up has announced that the next film is in development. The Dragon sequel has had about 3 scripts written and has been in development for about 5 years. When they hire a director and have a cast and start date, then a film is in development. MI6 like Bond 25, will likely be a go, but these "in development" claims are PR.

  • ZekidkZekidk
    Posts: 3,278
    @smitty

    The key factor here is Tom Cruise. It's his franchise. And I honestly don't see the series moving on without him playing the lead. Then there is the matter of his age. Of course he is in a rush to do the next, unlike other sequels or franchises that don't depend on one single person.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,860
    Zekidk wrote: »
    Paramount Pictures Vice Chairman Rob Moore, confirms that MI:6 is "already in development."
    http://www.ibtimes.com/mission-impossible-6-rob-moore-confirms-plans-movie-after-tom-cruises-announcement-2037462

    So what do people think what would you want for MI6 title wise team wise etc
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    I don't think age will be an issue for a decade.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Zekidk wrote: »
    Paramount Pictures Vice Chairman Rob Moore, confirms that MI:6 is "already in development."
    http://www.ibtimes.com/mission-impossible-6-rob-moore-confirms-plans-movie-after-tom-cruises-announcement-2037462

    So what do people think what would you want for MI6 title wise team wise etc

    Mission Impossible 6: Submission Impossible.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    Mission Impossible: Orbital Strike.

    I'm not gonna lie...I kinda want Ethan Hunt to go to space. :))
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    MI6: Permission Fine Ounce Impossible
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    Tom's next stunt?

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Great Red Bull commercial there.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    It would be interesting because there's an episode of the 88/89 Mission: Impossible series that had Jane Badler going into space to stop some from using a laser mounted Space Shuttle.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Tom s next stunt: Going to a Justin Bieber concert.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    Tom s next stunt: Going to a Justin Bieber concert.
    While riding Cthulhu I hope! :))

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Haha! I will start worshipping that Cthulhu deity right away.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,860
    I thought of a cool title

    Mission Impossible :Intimidation Game
  • boldfingerboldfinger
    Posts: 5,767
    Saw it today and am happily impressed. What a great way to start a film :-)! Good music too.
    I find it fascinating that the film milks the last out of ripping off especially Bond and Sherlock, while still keeping a strong individuality. Shows once more that doing things good goes a long way.
  • DoctorKaufmannDoctorKaufmann Can shoot you from Stuttgart and still make it look like suicide.
    edited August 2015 Posts: 1,261
    I am not sure about one aspect the author talks about in the above mentioned article.
    In another scene, the prime minister (actually Ethan Hunt in disguise) menaces MI6’s head Attle (Simon McBurney) with an enquiry, a situation Judi Dench’s M faced in Skyfall, too.

    Either this, or I missed something or got that completely wrong. :(
  • DoctorKaufmannDoctorKaufmann Can shoot you from Stuttgart and still make it look like suicide.
    edited August 2015 Posts: 1,261
    About the music score: I liked the way, Kraemer incorporated the MI-Theme and the "Nesun Dorma" in his score.

  • boldfingerboldfinger
    Posts: 5,767
    I know the answer, @DoctorKaufmann, but in order to be sure, you must watch the film again ;-).
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    And true to form just like I said in my initial review of this movie, a Marvel or DC property would want to snatch up Ferguson for a role. Seems like Léa Seydoux is up for the same female lead role for the x-men spinoff movie, Gambit.

    http://deadline.com/2015/08/rebecca-ferguson-lea-seydoux-abbey-lee-gambit-x-men-1201494275/
  • boldfingerboldfinger
    Posts: 5,767
    I wouldn´t mind too to give Rebecca Ferguson the female lead =P~
Sign In or Register to comment.