It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
OHMSS is one of the most loved bond films and SPECTRE aren't really used. DAF also don't have spectre. And its a new timeline, having blofeld without spectre could help re-imagine him in the modern day so he's different from dr evil and other parodies
I believe an intervention must be staged. Oh, well, at least you didn't pick DAF or Octopussy to watch 3 times a year.
By the way, does anybody else get this weird thrill out of saying "DAF" as a word? There may be something wrong with me, schedule that intervention for the both of us.
The first 3 out of 4 films built up to Blofeld being the creator and head of Spectre and the revealing of him obviously in YOLT. When you the name Bond? You think MI6! When you hear Leiter? Its CIA! Blofeld =Spectre!
Its just accepted as fact. He is the boss and everyone knows it!
you SMERSH could be a Black Water (XE) type organization "private" but not really.
There was however no mention of Spectre in DAF. Blofeld while ambitious as ever, seemed to have set aside the organizational structure of numbered subordinates, and was acting more as an independant criminal king-pin. You could say that Bond had at least temporarily helped to destroy the Spectre organization.
Bingo. I think Eon has kept them deliberately vague (especially in Casino Royale) in order to save their potential for future films.