It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
<font color=blue size=7><b>CR and QOS are more influenced by 9/11 than SF.</b></font>
I wouldn't say the Taliban are on the same level as Quantum, but agreed.
Skyfall is influenced by cyber-terrorism from groups like Anonymous and Wikileaks.
QOS?
Anyway, it has proved it self even with the shorter run so agree.
On the new one agree for what is said above.
Yes I concur also with the above. Skyfall isn't influenced by the attacks, less so than the immediate releases before it. It can't be argued
I would Agree with the thesis as obviously films are on a shorter run these days. It use to take almost 12 months for certain movies to be released for purchase but no longer.
Agree also. Though CR and QOS are a reboot of Bond, they do obviously take the terrorist angle for the plot line. Where as SF is more of of a personal issue for the villain.
<font color=blue size=7><b>SF could have been the proper final film for Brosnan after DAD.</b></font>
I personally think 'Silva' is Brosnan's 007.
Blames the boss for ruining his career, always has to make an entrance, isn't subtle, kind of dated (in attire, anyways) and really cocky. Very bitter. He should've known 'the rules of the game.'
Lots of that seems more like Connery to be honest. But I don't think Silva is anything like any of them.
Brosnan has every right to be bitter. And I don't think he is anymore, he did that documentary didn't he.
Disagree, and this is a real chance for the Brosnan bashers to once more have a go at him, so even the question reeks of bashing.
SF is a Craig movie while Brosnan should have has a movie more similar to FYEO to finish his reign with.
As far as Skyfall being Pierce Brosnan's final Bond film - no. I don't think Brosnan could have pulled it off, nor would it have made sense for Brosnan's Bond to be so affected over
<font color=blue size=7><b>John Glen would not have been a suitable director for Wood's MR script.</b></font>
I agree with you %100!
Thesis #188 - Unless Glen actually did it, we'll never know, but Lewis Gilbert did a good enough job of it, so can't say for sure. I'll disagree with thesis, as I'm happy with who did it back then and see no reason to change
Heh, one of the above responses, answered a response to Thesis #1 ? /:)
Perhaps you could elaborate?
No, MR had no suitable script for Glen. Or for a Bond film.
<font color=blue size=7><b>David Arnold would have been unable to score SF in accordance to Mendes' preferences.</b></font>
Agreed. Mendes like EoN productions, likes to reuse talents he's familiar with and has frequently collaborated with.
Yes, unless BB or MGW interject with their own suggestion, but it's 99.9% likely.