It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Sure in hindsight it was a nice lucky stroke for the franchise and allowed a new face to take over and they had plenty of time for the script.
<font color=blue size=7><b>A) Spottiswoode was better with action than with characters, B) Apted the other way around.</b></font>
Disagree: I was always under the impression that the delay was due to the old age hassle of dealing with McClory again wasn't it?
Going on both movies as I recall them to mind? I would have to agree with this thesis.
<font color=tomato size=4><b>THESIS 266</b></font>
<font color=blue size=7><b>Compared to 006, Carver
A) is a more convincing leader
B) gets his hands dirtier during the film
C) has a more convincing backstory.</b></font>
Yes to B
Yes to C
B - Killing Paris... I agree, that's a pretty dirty deed.
C - I'm rather impartial. I like both backstories.
B. Carver has Paris killed, but Trevelyan tries to kill Bond with his bare hands. I'll go with Trevelyan here.
C. No, since Carver doesn't get much of a backstory as I recall. Trevelyan's backstory is a bit of a stretch, but it can be explained by his father committing suicide out of survivor's guilt. Trevelyan also benefits immensely from having been Bond's friend and near-equal. Carver has none of that.
B. - No, I think that his hands are less dirty than Alec's. He is on the stealth boat at the end but, other than that, what does he do besides give orders?
C. - I agree. The story of a man who worked his way to the top of the newspaper industry and then became an extremely wealthy media mogul. His greed and ruthlessness, which served him well in the business world, ultimately became his undoing. Sounds a little less far fetched than a secret agent with a dark Cossack past.
You could say that about Alec though. He doesn't really do much more other than bark orders at people ("tell him now!", "prepare the dish", "find her" "get on with it") and give speeches.
Overall I would say disagree. He had no issues in killing his wife, the sailors from the sunken ship and also Gupta when he knew Gupta had done his job!
<font color=blue size=7><b>Moore replacing Connery was easier than Connery replacing Moore would have been.</b></font>
Moore benefited immensely from the Connery-Lazenby-Connery business. Without that, he would have had a similar fate to the Lazenator. On the other hand, Connery replacing Moore has no precedent, so it's hard to judge. I'll say that I disagree.
Depends on which film Connery debuts with. If he started with DN, then id definitely go with the affirmative. Had he started with DAF, it would have been a very seamless transition. Had it gone SC Dr. No->RM LALD, I don't think Sir Rog would have lasted long, but coming off of DAF the audiences were coming off of camp, so RM benefitted greatly from DAF
Agree I think. I say this in terms of how the world was at the time.
<font color=blue size=7><b>By now, Michael Wilson's contributions to the Bond films have become as important as Cubby's legacy.</b></font>
Absolutely. I don't think this is even up for debate; by this point, MGW has done as much for the series as Cubby did.
DISAGREE, Wilson builds on the enormous legacy build by Cubby, he and Barbara still have one major lesson to learn namely put the moeny spend on the big screen. These last two movies were expensive to make but seeing them I wonder where the heck all the money went to.
Cubby gave us a great franchise and so far Wilson & Broccoli jr. have done far too little to become as important. imho
Agree in the sense of protecting the franchise and its heritage. He is more recognised for his cameo's! Bless him!
;))
Disagree. He's done some very important stuff with the franchise, but I don't think anything will compare to Cubby's starting the series and delivering its glory days of the 1960's.