It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Would have to agree without doubt! A cold bloodied kill which I thought was brilliantly well done! Really liked Renard and thought he deserved a better finale to the one he got?
<font color=blue size=7><b>When a villain is physically weaker, he's usually intellectually more menacing.</b></font>
You don't have to look further than Le Chiffre.
Agree. The combination of both is far more desirable if possible? The last one I think was 006 Alec Trevelyan!! But if that is the case? All the more reason to have far more menacing henchman!
<font color=blue size=7><b>Bad entries sooner or later help the series in the long run as they usually lead to some of the better Bond films.</b></font>
On iTV2?
Yes - YOLT was followed by OHMSS, MR by FYEO, DAD by CR - so agree
Yes, though I switched over at 22:50 for Air Force One.
Of course. The Man With the Golden Gun lead to The Spy Who Loved Me, Moonraker lead to For Your Eyes Only, A View to a Kill lead to The Living Daylights, Die Another Day lead to Casino Royale, and Quantum of Solace lead to Skyfall.
Note that TMWTGG-TSWLM-MR-FYEO and DAD-CR-QOS-SF are all consecutive movies, so the series was rather bipolar during those periods.
Agree with this thesis. But then again if they were all brilliant? You would still have your own personal favourites regardless!
:D
*Luckily they really got back on track with TSWLM.
<font color=blue size=7><b>In the Craig era it might work to leave Bond's future uncertain at the end of a film, much like in Fleming's FRWL and YOLT.</b></font>
Thesis #280 - Agree with the last response, in that it would really help if Craig was still in the part of Bond. Not only that, adds a bit of intrigue and mystery, so that's another thesis in agreement
Well as far as we know? DC is only doing 2 more so it needs to be the next one! As Murdock said above? It needs to be the same actor playing Bond and not a new person 4 years down the line. So I agree.
I think the films can be linked,eg Quantum or Blofeld is/was,but i dont want cliffhangers.
These films will be shown separately as time goes on,even QOS must be confusing from the start for people who havent seen CR,forgotten how it ended or are watching Bond on tv for the first time,but it just gets away with it.
A 'cliffhanger' film wont get away with it,and we all know Bond would survive or return to MI6 or whatever so what's the point of it ?
Each Bond film needs a beginning,a middle and an end,IMO.