It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The whole thing of Bond being old is, I would say, meant to reflect the ageing franchise and also an ageing former superpower and the way it addresses its past. After all, Bond says 'We go back to the past' or something like that when he heads out to the SF lodge. The whole film is about the disgraceful treatment of its former colonies, in particular M and so on, and her taking up and mistreating orphans like Bond even has a pleasing symmetry with Dench's other film Philomena.
So you have all this old dogs stuff, but at the same time we have to fit it in with the previous two movies and their baggage regarding Bond's coming of age and growing up, which was always a big ask with Craig looking older. But that's what you get, I mean all the new films have to follow the screenwriter's dictum that the leading man has to be different at the end of the movie to how he is at the beginning. So they must have thought they were onto a winner with the whole CR reboot, as it allows Bond to be seen to develop emotionally as a person and fulfil that rule, only Bond was meant to take his time growing up, otherwise what do they do then?
The theme of ageing in SF clashes with his newbie theme in CR and QoS, but by that time I think audiences were expected to just deal with it and see Bond more as a generic character, esp after his Olympics stunt that year. That's why you have the Aston equipped like in the Connery films, it's Bond as a generic guy, not an individual.
<font color=blue size=7><b>Q's gadgets made the screenwriters lazy during the later Moore years.</b></font>
That's why the tome for OHMSS is just perfect, and I blame ole' George for lousing up a pretty good thing going. He had that brutal hotel room fight in his film, while did ANYONE buy Moore being able to beat up anybody in Live and Let Die?
Would have loved to have seen Laz in that one.
That has nothing to do with the thesis at hand.
The theme is the gadgets in the Moore years, and I think all that just got out of control. the Gondola car? Really? Which Moore film was that?
I will say, that in all fairness, the Lotus in, I think it was TSWLM was really, really cool.
The Little Nellie scene in particular always seemed so extraneous. It was just an excuse to show off Q's latest toy and I always laugh unintentionally at it. I'm sure it looked cool in 1967 but it hasn't aged well in my opinion.
You could also extend it through to SF. A lot of necessary explanation is buried underneath the hacking and general tech gibberish. The Moore tenure was definitely hampered by an over-reliance on gadgets, they just became too much of a staple, with little thought for their validity or necessity. That said, I've still got to laugh at Rog in the Crocodile Sub.
At least with a watch you can wear it conspicuously around your wrist all the time.
Oh and Rog in the crocodile sub has to be one of the silliest shots in the entire series.
I'm not blaming him for this, on the contrary. I think the weakest parts of TLD and LTK are often linked to the use of gadgets, or simply their introduction.
It is true that computer hacking becomes a deux ex machina in SF.
I love the crocodile sub. It serves a purpose and is a useful gadget not implausible.
Me too.
Yes, those gadgets make for lazy screenwriting, and have been ever since up 'till DAD, where the invisible car's tracks are not spotted by the guards. I mean come on. Anyway, it just got worse and worse.
But after much consideration it was decided to do a reboot and go with a younger actor to play Bond.
This started to a certain extent with TB with the jet pack and water jets in the DB5.
YOLT carried it on with the aforementioned safe cracker and the climbing suckers and ninja outfit.
Then there's DAF with its fake fingerprints.
Then the Brozza era has the BMW logo wire cutter thing in TND and the miracle super rappelling watch in TWINE to name the most obvious.
To level this solely at the Rog era seems a bit harsh. And what better cover than a gondola in Venice? Of course Q is going to soup it up a bit. It's a great gadget? No? ;)
I'm not so sure - both illogical and completely cheesy - even if the Jetpack did actually work how did Bond infiltrate the place with it? Did he silently fly it, in except of course it makes a noise similar in volume to a Boeing 747 taking a dump after a particularly hot vindaloo, or is he supposed to have stealthily shinned up the drainpipe with it on his back and stashed it for later?
Would certainly agree with this thesis. It's like the plot is written around the gadgets instead of the story being the driving force!