It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Agreed. I hope the writers give Dan a bit more grey matter to work with in SP. Surely we are past the 'newly promoted gung-ho agent' phase by now...
And yes, he looks good / better than in SF. Mature, but most definitely not past it.
Has Dan had a little bit of work done?
I vehemently agree wuth this.
Men who look younger than they are often don't age well, I find.
well thanks! there goes my future.
That's not always the case in my experience, especially when it comes to people of colour. However, in Craig's case, he's always had a somewhat "vintage" look to him and whereas he's looked older than he is in many instances, right now, he looks on par ti how he looked circa 2006. aside from genetics, people's looks can change due to many factors from a varied diet to excersise and overall lifestyle changes.
I have learned that years ago, reading you on Connanderbond. ;)
Now I definately will buy you a Vesper if we ever meet!
Its Easter, I could make the time. Where do you live? :D
(Oops, soon they will say "Take a room, you two")
Germanlady is on to something there. From a straight male perspective (not that it even really matters, but obviously influences the subjectivity as there is no actual attraction involved) I agree that the 'boyish' good lookers tend not to age well.
I think Michael J Fox, DiCaprio and Matt Damon all looked better when they were younger. Craig however I'd put more in the Connery/Clive Owen/Kevin Costner kind of mould, they definitely aged better than the first bunch and their looks improved after their 20's rather than diminished. Fingers crossed, I guess... :-bd
This can also apply to certain women, by the way :>
Not too far from the skinny bridge. In a place even more beautiful. And other then folklore may suggest, we don't all stand hugging ourselves on dark corners... ;-)
@AceHole, just trying to cheer me up I guess? :-P
Maybe not for people of colour, but for white men I often find it to be the case.
It's a place from where you can see lovely old ladies beeing dragged from canals and killers take pictures of said canals for the children.
<font color=blue size=7><b>A good Bond script has Bond do a lot of improvisation.</b></font>
It is typically the case that the less script there is, the less satisfying the results. The 60s Casino Royale is a good case in point. The film has its moments, but not many. The talents of many fine actors were wasted on that one, particularly Orson Welles, who improvised a great deal in Citizen Kane.
For me its less about improvisation than it is having a director and writers who are open to changes when a situation arises. And sometimes happy accidents occur that are worth keeping.