It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Mr Kiss Kiss Bang Bang was a perfect fit for the club scene where Fiona met her demise. Tom's Thunderball did a great job in setting up that epic feel that the film delivered.
Disagree. Tom Jones belting out TB is a perfect way to start the film. It's like an anthem to Bond which is partially why it's my favorite Bond title song. Mr. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is good also and Barry's instrumentals of it nicely underscore Bond's scenes with Domino and Fiona. However, EON made the right decision with the Jones classic as TB's main title song.
Very well said @Volante. I share all your thoughts on this one.
Both great songs, but Tom Jones' powerful vocals set the tone of the movie to perfection and also the traits of Largo well.
<font color=blue size=7><b>50 years of Bond films is an achievement that no other film franchise can compete with.</b></font>
I disagree. Of course also because Tom Jones did it, but the lyrics of Mr Kiss Kiss Bang Bang not fit and that already start with the title. In specialy for a movie who be so weak. Also the song from Jones is faster, Basey is to slow. Another one from Bassey after GF is mabey to fast and the song is not strong enough.
Whyle Bassey be re-jected for QOS, mabey we can hear the song she did for end of Skyfall or Bond 24. 'No good about goodbye' is a better song then Kiss Kiss Bang Bang.
If you look at official EON outings there is always a new adventure each time we see him, forgetting the spat with Mclory and NSNA. It's always set in modern times and reflects events of the day and times we live in. We do not need to see Bond remakes!
So I suppose love or hate them, you've got the Broccoli's to thank for Bond's success.
Agreed. Tell George Lucas to call us when Star Wars has survived for 50 years and 22 films.
Bond films play out like episodic serials. The Bond archetypte is firmly established. The basic characters are established and can re-occur: Bond, M, Q, Moneypenny, Felix (at times)...But each adventure can vary a bit: there's always a new leading lady, a villain, location, a variation to Bond's vehicle and gadgets: the possibilities are endless with these elements. Yet there is a consistency in production crew throughout, therefore it always has felt like there has been a mark of quality with each film (which is why NSNA felt a little off). Bond every 2-4 years is like the Olympics; always an exciting event to anticipate. No other movie series has that.
Congrats on the 50th thesis as well. I enjoy these little debates.
Sorry to say that new Bond films will come out long afte I'm dead and buried and I'll never get to see them.
Thesis 50: Well, duh. This isn't really much of a thesis. There are really no other franchises, save for Star Trek, that have lasted as long as the James Bond franchise.
Actually, the Japanese surpass Bond from a strictly numerical perspective. The Godzilla franchise, omitting the '98 Emmerich film, has thus far spawned no less than 28 films (!) since 1954 and is still on-going. While their quality can be debated, they are technically the longest running film franchise in movie history, both in terms of years and of output. ;-)
James Bond > All.