It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
We know this already...
...Oh, wait- was that a question of whether I agree or not? Because I thought it was a universal rule. ;)
Disney. Some movies already be made for the Bond novels be written. Also some very tales there make movies from exist longer. Cinderella/Assepoester for example is from 1634! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinderella
Snowwhite/Sneeuwwitje movie is from 1937. It be oldest movie in my dvd collection and the archief footage and actors are older. In age iam afraid Disney wins too, born earlier then Fleming and died later then Fleming.
Disney's vast output of films isn't centred around one character or one mythology. By this logic, I could argue that the Universal monsters hold a more impressive record than the Bond films too. The Bond franchise is pure and genuine, focused on one character. I think the difference is clear.
<font color=blue size=7><b>Roger Moore's Bond was quite capable of being dead serious and ruthless.</b></font>
LALD - It used to be a convincing act, Rosie. It's wearing a little thin now.
It's not an act. It's...
Make your choice.
FYEO - Moore's ruthlessness peaks when he kicks Loque's car off the cliff.
Completely agree with all of the above! And as already mentioned Roger took a more lighter approach to the role. When he did play it serious he was pretty convincing IMHO.
There are many more scenes where Moore is serious and really good at it, too.
The killing of the knife throwing twin at the log cabin
Killing of Locque in For Your Eyes Only
Killing of Stromberg, The spy Who Loved Me
Putting Nick Nack in the suitcase and on top sail of ship
Killing the guards after interrogation of General Orlov, Octopussy
Intruders scene at the Octopussy Island
Interrogation of Miss Anders about Scaramanga's whereabouts
Attempted killing of Scaramanga over dinner
Discovery of Sir Godfrey Tibbett's death after Zorin discovers who he really is
getting trivial now but some worthwhile examples nonetheless, i.e. Moore was serious sometimes
Thesis 51: Disagree
Moore is not such a bad Bond no matter what anybody says, he was the man for Live and Let Die, my own personal favorite and also did some fine work with Spy and Eyes Only, and Moonraker while absurd, was a damn fine adventure with lots to keep the interest, it's only his final appearances I take issue with, I know, he knows, and most will be honest enough to admit he should of stepped down from the role before 1983
He should have stepped down After 1983 if you ask me
Moore was great in Octopussy and the only one that could have done it. Especially when going up against Connery.
<font color=blue size=7><b>The poison pen letter joke should not have been used in OP since it was already mocked in CR67.</b></font>