It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Watching it for the first time I found it extremely unlikely, but somehow plausible; though honestly I didn't think it was a very good character trait when compared to other Bond villains. Now I just ignore it.
As it wasn't used one bit, this "bullet-in-the-head issue" was too stupid than anything else.
I find this too big a conceit honestly. Possible? Perhaps. Plausible? Not so much... ;-)
I suppose the problem with TWINE was that they didn't exploit the gimic enough.
Disagree.
I found it plausible enough, Carlyle had a bullet lodged in his head and killing off his senses etc, perfectly feasible, disagree with thesis
The fight with Bond as the end, could've been a whole different scenario. Instead it has an over abundance of 'pain face' a shot of Denise Richards in a wet t shirt, and some terrible lines; "Welcome to my nuclear family."
Going back to Molly Wharmflash's account of Renard, she says it's killing of his senses, touch, smell, he feels no pain. So with that in mind, would he not be reduced to a wheelchair bound invalid? Afterall, he would loose the sensation of feel, he certainly couldn't hold a gun or plutonium rod methinks.
Denise Richards in a wet t shirt? Suddenly I'm not complaining anymore.
<font color=blue size=7><b>Kamen's score for LTK makes more use of the Bond Theme than Barry's last couple of scores.</b></font>
I think it was an intriguing idea that stretches probablity no more than many other things in the Bond universe. It certainly falls within Flemings maxim of 'going wildly beyond the probable but not the possible.
But I agree with you - its just pathetically ignored with the only references being the holding of the hot rocks, getting shot in the arm and getting the pieces of broken table stuck in his hand. In the final ruck with Bond absolutely nothing which is criminal screenwriting.
Why would losing the sensation of touch make you an invalid? Its an electrical pulse along your nerves which has nothing to with your ability muscular ability to stand or grip. Admittedly you wouldnt know when you were holding something unless you could see your hand was in contact with it but theres no inherent obstacle to being able to fight and hold a plutonium rod.
Or another way of phrasing it 'Kamen flogged the Bond theme to death in LTK whereas Barry used it with restraint and his scores were all the better for it.'
It is an indisuptable fact that Kamen uses it more than AVTAK and TLD (probably combined) Whether that is a good thing is not part of the thesis so I guess - Thesis correct.
Next.
I think TLD has a better balance of Bond theme and other themes than LTK does.
And Kamen didnt write a bar of it.
To be fair, the thesis is about the abundance of the Bond theme in Kamen's score, not about the quality of the score compared to Barry's music. ;-)
<font color=blue size=7><b>Had Sam Neil stepped in as Bond, AVTAK would have needed script adjustments.</b></font>
AVTAK needed major script adjustments regardless of the actor playing Bond.
I could have sworn he was up for it for TLD though, not AVTAK.
Whoever was cast in AVTAK (I think it was TLD that Neill auditioned for), the film would have needed reworking. Though I can never quite make my mind up on Neill, then again, i've never seen Reilly Ace Of Spies (the tv series that no doubt put him on EONs radar).
LOL. Too true. I wonder if they should have gone forward with the Halley's Comet idea after all...
Disagree with thesis, whichever way you look at it, Moore did a fine job at the time, it was a very good release, unlike the two subsequent disasters he appeared in
Suppose if Neill, or anyone else had got the part, I don't necessarily think any real adjustments were really needed. I would of wanted Collins for the part in the early 1980s, he was ideal I think sometimes, not someone like Neill. All said, Moore stayed on, did the film, it was a success, he should of parted company with the series then and not stayed on and embarrassed himself, but that's how I feel about it