It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
George Lazenby in a cameo in The men from Uncle
Roger Moore as Roger Moore in the Cannonball run, and as M in Northsea Hijack.
Tinothy Dalton just plays a better baddie as hero
Pierce Brosnan in Matador or the Thomas Crown Affair.
Daniel Craig in Archangel
Roger Moore as The Saint
Pierce Brosnan in Thomas Crown Affair, After the Sunset, The Tailor of Panama, Matador.
Daniel Craig in Layer Cake.
Sean in the Rock is very obviously playing an older Bond. Great movie BTW.
<font color=blue size=7><b>Dalton had a tougher job acting opposite Davi than opposite Krabbe.</b></font>
As to who is the better actor that would be subjective as hell.
Therefor I would say that this thesis is BS and will end in a subjective choice based upon familiarity with the actor.
But don't a lot of Bond films exist in parallel universes to each other? What about the change of Blofeld actors? The fact that Bond barely gives a crap in DAF that Blofeld just killed his wife in the previous story? The fact that Blofeld doesn't recognize Bond in OHMSS? Nevermind the change in Bond actors.
Yes definitely! So is his Playboy club card in DAF! That's how you do product placement. Not this Heineken nonsense. **Ms. Broccoli and MGW take note**
Although i liked both villains, i agree with the thesis. Davi is one of my favourites as a villain. Very menacing and a man you dare not cross! Brilliant!
I'm sorry...
:-S
question is : was it tougher for Dalton to act against Davi than Krabbe because Davi was more talented than Krabbe ?
So I guess this thesis when it comes down to it, is Koskov or Sanchez, which was better acted. Well I like Sanchez better so I guess it's an agree.
As it comes down to the writing rather than acting ability, I disagree with the thesis.
<font color=blue size=7><b>James Bond: The Legacy is the most complete source of Bond history knowledge printed so far.</b></font>
The Krabbe character, Koskov, seemed a little awkward to work with. While Jeroen himself is a fine actor, the character that year, well I'd be a little embarrassed if I was Dalton then and doing scenes, it all appeared a bit unsavory sometimes, but only on a very minor scale, I think if I was Dalton, and looking back, I'd be more comfortable working with Davi, the man was a bit of a powerhouse actor at the time, his Sanchez character had a real presence, and while Dalton may have been a little unsure of what to expect, or nervous even, but that seems doubtful, I just feel at the times, that out of the two Dalton would of been more uncomfortable working with the Koskov character than the Sanchez one, but at the same time, do feel Dalton would of been more comfortable perhaps working with Krabbe instead of Davi, at least in terms of pre production. It's a bit of a scrambled response, but that's just how I feel about it
(new thesis has arrived before I had a chance to finish, but there you are)
I would assume so? But sadly i not own a copy so unable to make a decision? But having sais that? I will read with interest what others may have to say?
EDIT: Looking at the book on Amazon it was published in 2002. There is something better out there, I would think.
I have the "James Bond Encyclopedia" by Steven Jay Rubin. It was a good introduction into all things Bond, though the one sticky point is the author's personal reviews of the films. He seems to love Connery, but is unfavorable towards Moore and Dalton.
Those are Fleming's books. /:)