It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The shot of Craig coming out of the water to me is interesting and fun ( a take on Dr. No obviously) but overall I say he is not strongly aimed towards a female audience more than other Bonds; not that I sense anyway.
I just enjoy these films for many reasons, and the attractiveness of the Bond actor is a good one. ;) I don't want their portrayal to change, slanted more one way or the other in that regard.
I did not know Tamahori was openly gay. Cross dressing incident, yes.
Yes and no. Craig's Bond comes off as more of an alpha male than Brosnan's Bond did but I can see that appealing to both men and women for different reasons. However, I think both the Craig and Brosnan films aim at a more female audience than the Connery, Lazenby, Moore and Dalton ones do.
There did seem to be quite a significant amount of 'physique focus' on Craig from what I can remember in his two releases, obviously Brosnan wasn't exactly Mr Olympia standards by the time he departed, but I think I remember seeing more shots of Craig's body than I did action, so any women watching may well have been thrilled enough, but it did little this end. Thesis seems accurate
So I disagree... certanly in CR they use more the body image of Craig, but I see Brosnan's Moneypenny and his Bond girls as examples of an open approach to the female public.
I'm not sure he was...he had powerful women in his own family.
Anyway, no, I don't think the Craig films are more aimed at a female audience. DC plays a more physical Bond. He's far more believable in his fighting then Brosnan was, but that also means that when he takes his shirt off, he's got a more muscular body. We did see Brosnan in similar circumstances (GE, swimming and then 'fighting' with Famke Jansen, showering with Wai Lin) but you don't see anyone talking about that.
But if he were truly a misogynist, he would have put MGW solely in charge, not MGW and Babs.
<font color=blue size=7><b>Krest's exploding head was too OTT for a Bond film.</b></font>
Kananga's exploding head in LALD was too OTT because it looked so fake.
On the thesis 115, negative. It fits Sanches's brutality, and if there's one thing I like about the film, is the way Bond manages to win S' trust, and at the same time eliminating Krest.
<font color=blue size=7><b>Of all the Bond films, OHMSS built most fan enthusiasm after its release.</b></font>
http://i532.photobucket.com/albums/ee321/Spankyps3/licence-to-kill.jpg
Remember the MGM copyright thingy, please.
If I'm reading the thesis right, it means that OHMSS didn't have much enthusiasm upon release, but did later on from fans, and built the most post-release enthusiasm among all the titles.
Yeah, I'd probably say so. I might even throw in Moonraker. It did very well at the box office at the time. But didn't get the reviews and was thought of as the blot of the series by many for years after--"Bond goes into space!". But it seems it's regaining appreciation again.