It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Ah it's the entrance specified on the invite. Apologies, it was a good curveball. I just read the sign on the flag so you had me scrambling around street view 😂
Okay, I'll be back with another round shortly.
That would be Trigger Mortis, my favourite continuation novel out of the two I've read so far. There is a link between that novel and this location I'll say that much.
Thanks for the guess but I'm afraid not. Again, apologies for the miscommunication, it's not from a continuation novel but it and its purpose is referenced in the one I mentioned. But this is the first time a main character goes to this location.
It's not from a Fleming Bond novel
Just trying to compile all the info we have so far.
EDIT: Is it the construction site northwest of Patterson, NJ? Owned by Blue Diamond.
I always defined Continuation novel as any James Bond novel not written by Fleming (except for non-fiction reference books, etc).
I see now how confused this can get, maybe we should stick to just Fleming 😅
This is way off topic of course, but I'm interested; what makes Carte Blanche not in the same continuity of the Fleming novels, but Solo is?
Yeah, I agree really. We've got to have a system! :)
To me that's more elegant than saying, The Fleming Bonds, the Continuation Bonds, FAAD which is neither because it's not a continuation of any particular story, Carte Blanche because it's not in the same continuity of the Fleming Bonds, [insert any other exceptions that exist or will exist], and the Spin-Offs.
The key difference between these two scenarios is the definition of Continuity; the latter defines continuity is strictly continuing the linear story of James Bond from Casino Royale to present, and the former (mine) just defines it as a continuation of the work of Ian Fleming.
I'm afraid so, you're not even on the right continent.