It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Both of these were in short supply in the Craig era of films so a return to one of them would likely be a welcome return.
Bond was once a cultural snob, or do we say a cultural encyclopedia? Often able to quote the best wines, the best food and always knew a little bit about everything. The correct temperature of sake, the taste for indifferently blended brandy. James would often show off his knowledge, especially in the office. I learned quite a bit about things through my love of James Bond movies.
OR would you prefer a lighter Bond.
Bond was also once known to dispense a one-liner or two when facing danger. In the Sean Connery and Roger Moore eras these were often used to break tension and give the audience some humour. I'm thinking of "What a helpful chap." "Do you mind if my partner sits this one out, she's just dead."
Bonus marks if you want to share your favourite cultural knowledge OR favourite one-liner
I vote for sophistication.
We could have both, this thread is dedicated to would you rather so we always pose a question for people to share their thoughts.
Cultural entendre.
Oh yeah I completely understand. I just think that both humor and sophistication are both crucial elements to the Bond character that to lose one in favor of the other would result in losing some of the elements that make Bond so unique.
That’s just my two cents of the subject matter. I suppose I’d like to see Bond be a bit more “cultured” than he has been throughout some of the Brosnan/Craig films though. I guess that part of the character was alluded too in Casino Royale but we’ve never really seen a full blown, culturally sophisticated Bond since at least the Dalton years.
I raised this very issue on another thread. Maybe the producers think that would come across as too snobbish or (even) culturally inappropriate to modern audiences. I tend to disagree. I think that it makes Bond appear to be really acknowledgeable (one of the major reasons that I fell in love with the character in the first place), and those moments - to me anyway - are a sign of respect to foreign cultures.
I agree; it’s hard to pinpoint a reason why that part of the character has been downplayed lately. It’d be nice to see the next Bond be a bit more culturally enriched than he has been lately.
As much as I admire Brosnan, I do have a hard time believing he’d figure out the problem with drinking red wine with fish ;).
I would like to see the return of a witty and sophisticated Bond. Elevate the audience instead of dropping down to its level.
I think it’s more that it was something the films exaggerated by the 70s/Moore era. It gets to the point Bond immediately knows about obscure tropical plants. And yes, it can make Bond look arrogant and smarmy.
But I can see it being done well. Bond in the books doesn’t know everything, but he has his interests and is even asked by people like M to recount what he knows about something. You could even have him learning something for a mission and having to use that knowledge/recount something relevant to the Bond girl or whoever.
That's one thing I loved about OHMSS: Bond is no heraldist and, even though he did his homework, he slipped. Bond should be cultured and knowledgeable, but not a know-it-all. Which means some people, villains and allies, should know more than he does on some subjects.
so, I choose the on-liners.
Would you rather have a car with revolving license plates OR a watch that has magnetic powers?
On one hand a great gadget to foul up the police and allow you to perhaps escape police parking tickets or chases. The ability to switch a license plate might be a great thing to have on your car.
The other hand you have a watch that could possibly deflect a bullet or at the very least lower the zipper of a dress on a beautiful Italian agent. The uses are quite extensive for this watch.
Which one would you rather have?
Not sure what I'd do with the number plates, I probably have even less use for them! And if I got pulled over with them I'd be getting a criminal record, so I'll definitely go for the Rolex! :)
However, if I'm adding this tech to cars/watches I already use then I'll take the magnet.
Would you rather the PTS had a big action stunt OR a more grounded PTS?
The big action stunts started with Spy and have been seen on and off throughout the series since. I think of following as having a big action stunt piece. TSWLM, MR, OP, GE, TWINE, DAD, QOS, SF, SP, NTTD.
The more grounded PTS include GF, TB, YOLT, OHMSS, DAF, FYEO, AVTAK, TLD, LTK, and SF.
We have some outliers with FRWL, LALD and TMWTGG as they don't feature Bond at all.
Looking over the list of films, which camp do you belong in? Feel free to call out a PTS that is your all time fav!