It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Tanner certainly wasn't needed in SP and arguably TMWTGG. That could have been any expository character, and he didn't resemble the Tanner of the books at all in his behavior.
Maybe bring in Ronnie Vallance if the story calls for him. Fleming created many wonderful side characters in Bond's world. Let the new Bond actor have chemistry with someone new, and let them be cut off from MI6 and get to bloody work. That approach worked wonders with Mathis in CR. It was not the character box-checking that started in SF. I blame Mendes.
Just use the MI6 characters only as they are needed. I didn't miss Moneypenny or Q in CR at all. I didn't miss Q in LALD either.
I agree. Let's get rid of the idea having to sport the entire crew every time.
But given that Craig's Bond ended permanently and died I think it makes more sense to have new actors in the roles. I agree with @echo lets not have backstories or grand introductions to Mi6 personnel. I didn't like the whole "no Harris isn't Moneypenny she's Eve an Mi6 agent."
Have them be there, it didn't cause me to not enjoy DN not knowing the back story of M, Moneypenny or the Armorer.
Lets jump off for another choice!
Would you rather listen to Dame Shirley belt out Goldfinger OR Diamonds Are Forever?
Dame Shirley Bassey is the only artist to sing three Bond theme songs. Two of them are considered some of the best in the series. I wonder which one would you rather listen to? Goldfinger or Diamonds Are Forever?
I’ve been known to warble both around the house in equal measure. :))
They're both fantastic, along with MR. As others have said, it depends on my mood to be honest. But in order to give you an answer...DAF. No GF...DAF.
Here's a question: most remastered versions of the DAF song I've heard seem to omit that opening chord that segues into the iconic melodic intro. WHY??????
I was in the mood to hear the song the other day and every version I found online was like that.
Also remastered versions of GF online sound muffled to me.
But I felt GF was a bit dated (it's obviously an old song 😁), as much as it's one of my least favorite films, I'd go with DAF, it didn't felt dated as much as GF, DAF had some touch of modern tones like drum beats and bass.
GF was purely orchestraic which made it, for me, a moody listening or depends upon the mood when I'm in the vibe to listen to the old songs, same for the Classical Pieces like Vivaldi, Mozart and etc.
Meanwhile DAF felt contemporary that it wouldn't be even an out of place if played in a radio, but GF would be felt like your average Grandparents' songs (which again, is not a bad thing, but just made it to me somewhat a moody listen).
That's said DAF is still not perfect as a song, for me, it felt a bit repetitive though.
Moonraker is my favorite Shirley Bassey Bond song! (Might be unpopular, but it is).
If I am going to choose, and it seems only fair since I am making others do it, I would choose DAF no GF okay seriously GF, nope, I think I would choose DAF. The smart lyrics win it by a nose!
I guess while the GF theme is the most iconic of them all (like just about every other element of GF), I really sort of prefer both DAF and MR (the themes) for listening to.
And now for something completely different:
Work for Stromberg Shipping and work towards a life under the sea OR work for Drax Industries and work towards a life in outer space?
Therefore, I'd go with Drax, being in space is a great experience, with all the beautiful set pieces (his space station), lasers and all, it's a unique moment in such an entire life, and there's no drowning, as long as you know how to handle yourself, there's a possibility of you surviving in space, in ocean, there are sharks with you just floating around elsewhere, nowhere to be seen and forever get lost (I've seen a lot of movies with almost few people got survived just floating on the sea with either a boat or a raft and they're dead, just think of Titanic), I don't want that to happen to me.
But in space, there's still a higher chance of surviving (look at Jaws and Dolly).
For the next Bond adventure:
Would you rather the next movie take Bond to Down Under or The Great White North?
Down Under is Australia, Great White North Canada. Neither country has been featured in a Bond film. (although some scenes have been shot in Canada filling in for Austria) What part of the country or city could you see being a good place to take double-o-7!