Best and worst case scenario for the Amazon Bond

15678911»

Comments

  • edited April 13 Posts: 2,604
    QBranch wrote: »
    Bounine wrote: »
    Faithfully adapted Fleming material. Yes! We can dream... :)
    That would be cool, but I wouldn't want it if the project hinders production time on or otherwise affects the films.

    Other best case scenarios for me regarding the Amazon Bond, is that they inject more Fleming material, by using the Risico title; bringing in characters and products not yet seen in the films. Characters like Gala, Loelia & May, items like Bond's Beretta, Morland & Floris. Palmolive shaving cream with secret compartment. These additions would likely draw in Fleming purists disenchanted with the new guard. Adapt a couple of the comics - some of them are very good. Look at taking more ideas from the continuation novels. Release toy merch that ties in with the film. Especially toy versions of what's seen in the film. Kids will want the latest gadget that Bond uses and collectors will gobble that up. Hire talented freelance artists to design the posters and promo artwork, returning to the sketched/painted artwork that everyone loves.

    Those are all great ideas.

    I'm a fan of most of the continuation novels but I've never read a Bond comic or any comics for that matter. I've never known in what order to read the dialogue.

    Worst case scenario: a 007 porno.

    Best case scenario: a 007 porno.

    Joking aside, why does Bond no longer showcase his knowledge of booze? I watched ‘Diamonds Are Forever’ recently – good dialogue in general. It fits the tone of the film.

    I turned 48 in January. I’m now older than Bond! :)

    I got most of what I wanted in the Craig era and I'm grateful. Thank you, Eon for your efforts and good luck with your future.
  • ImpertinentGoonImpertinentGoon Everybody needs a hobby.
    edited 12:19pm Posts: 1,381
    I think Amazon will prioritize getting a few films made quickly to make sure the character is well established for their iteration and tenure as owners.

    I think one of the biggest mistakes Amazon-MGM could make right now would be to lock in and communicate a release date too early. Obviously, you want a endpoint for any big project in order to plan against it and I am a strong believer in restrictions being good for products.
    However, I also think this weird thing studios did in the last 5-7 years where they put a specific date on films years out lead to some of the worst results in tentpole movies in a long time. Something always happens and suddenly you hear they had to write the third act on set (sound familiar); they did extensive re-shoots with half a new cast; the VFX had to be done in two weeks and looks accordingly and half the stuff they showed in marketing didn't even make it into the film.
    They'll surely have certain windows in mind now that the pre-production is a go, but we're still in the phase where a lot of thought has to happen and loads of availability shedules (writer, director, lead, locations) have to be made to work with each other.
    Boring comment, I know.
    Bounine wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Bounine wrote: »
    Faithfully adapted Fleming material. Yes! We can dream... :)
    [...]
    Joking aside, why does Bond no longer showcase his knowledge of booze?

    [...]



    Everyone always goes on about 9/11 and Bourne and the Nolan Batman films and especially Austin Powers putting Bond in a tough spot in the late-90s/early-2000s, but I think there's a good article for a smart person to write about how the hyper-fixation of dedicated internet/social media cultures is killing this niche but important part of Bond.

    To be more clear, I think at least a small part of "Why does Bond no longer showcase his knowledge of [X]?" is that in the 50s for Fleming and then through to the 70s and possibly right into the 90s, things like booze "culture" were so much simpler then they are now. Bond could just drop something as his personal favourite and the vast majority of people would just take it as "well, if he likes it, it must be good" and a few experts would either take it as an acceptable choice - because there just were a couple of acceptable choices for the writer to pick and you were good - or would write it off as a bit of an eccentricity.
    Today, you'd immediatly have think pieces, podcasts and tweets and reddit comments about every little thing (google "why shaken not stirred" to see what I mean) and it's basically a battle you can't win.

    Plus, it's all product placement anyway and online communities sniff that out in a second.
  • Posts: 1,807
    I think there's a simpler explanation. Many people don't wear suits to work anymore, so why should they care who Bond's tailor is?

  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,556
    I think there's a simpler explanation. Many people don't wear suits to work anymore, so why should they care who Bond's tailor is?

    So you have obviously never been to the financial centers of any major city in the world...
Sign In or Register to comment.