It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Well, I'd say more strongly for men (I am so guessing here): CR, TB, LTK, FRWL, DN, GE, TSWLM, and OHMSS. Plopping the rest of Bond as "family" entertainment.
Not sure I like that moniker though.
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/1253/are-there-any-women-here-on-mi6/p9#Item_242
As for manly men Bond films, I'd wager that all the Connery sans YOLT and DAF, OHMSS, TLD, LTK, and CR and QoS would be listed.
In all fairness I must agree with other writers that Bond movies are great "date movies". I saw the early ones with my school chums but as I matured I have taken a date to most of the later ones. The first one I actually saw with a date was TSWLM. I would gladly take a date to any Bond film today.
Casino Royale, obviously as it is basically a tragic love story and Vesper is such a relateable character.
And funnily enough, The Living Daylights. The romance of the whole Vienna part with Bond and Kara is appealing.
As 99% of all action movies are.
A good portion of this comes from the fact that in Fleming's Casino Royale, Bond fell in love with Vesper, and in order to make a faithful film, this had to be brought in. Quantum just kept it because it was a direct sequel.
I meant stuff like the appalling 'Bond coming out of the water' scene in CR... The silly walk, the OTT close-ups, the OTT music... It completly destroyed the Bond character. dare I say this scene was borderline homoerotic, which is totally contrary to what Bond should be. I am tired of the over-emphasis on Craig's body during the last 2 films. When Bond was shirtless in the previous 20 films, he was just shirtless, no need to rub it in our faces with close-ups of his body. I hope in a future edition of CR the beach scene in the Bahamas and the beach scene with Vesper will be removed from the film.
That's very interesting. I did love CR and I do love a good love story, but I also enjoyed the action as well.
Exactly!
DaltonCraig007 you're killing me LOL. Maybe the scenes with him coming out of the water have something to do with the fact that Bond is appealing to men and women. Or maybe the fact that the producer (Babs) is a woman (?) I do recall that when Craig got the part and everyone was whinning about his looks, Babs came to the rescue by saying, "Daniel Criag is very sexy"...or words to that effect.
Also recall the main titles of CR no more nude women in shadow but those men fighting and shots of Craig...maybe Babs was driving the ship and making a blow for equality among the sexes.
We all work out at the gym and we can look at a man who is "cut" and we admire his physique that but doesn't make us gay. Talk about men wanting to be Bond. Lots of us guys would love to have DC's physique.
Well, that part can be a little annoying. Especially when your cousin has an immense crush on Daniel Craig, even though she'll never leave Kansas...
I know a lot of other females that like Bond, but like me, they got into the fandom because of male family members. It seems doubtful that women would be drawn into the series on their own.
(Funny though, the Kara/Bond romance and the Vesper/Bond romance were two of my least favorite parts of those movies. Then again, my taste in films has always been rather tomboyish. :P )
Maybe I am in the minority, but I got into Bond thru the novels and it was a sole plunge. I'm an only child; parents didn't go to Bond films. I was always a tomboy maybe that's part of it. And I've always had guy friends. It's nice growing up having Bond in your life, even as a female. It's a fun, adventurous, exciting, exotic, thrilling, and sexy world is Bond.
Apparently you missed the early Connery films. Connery spent more time with his shirt off in Thunderball than Craig did in CR & QoS combined. There were no more close ups of Craig shirtless than there were of Connery (BTW, Connery's shorts in TB were ALMOST as tight as Craig's in CR.).
I don't remember shots like this in Connery's films...
http://screenmusings.org/CasinoRoyale/pages/CR_0370.htm
http://screenmusings.org/CasinoRoyale/pages/CR_0373.htm
No, but was there a need for Craig to do a silly walk, have OTT music and OTT close-ups of his body ? Honestly the beach scene seemed to be orientated at 75% to gay audience, 25% to female audience. The whole scene is apalling.
So it was a "For Chicks' Eyes Only" shot in a primarily male movie, you don't even like the movie anyway, if you don't want to see the shot, press "skip" on the DVD remote.
Que ? CR was not a male movie. It was a chick flick. Male Bond films were from 1962-1989, slightly less in 1995-2002, and non-existent since 2006. CR butchered Fleming, butchered Bond and ignored the main audience which is the male audience.
QoS had the PTS car chase, the chase through Sienna after Mitchel, the fight with Slate, the stuff at the docks, the shoot out at the opera, the cops-&-Mathis scene (when they find Mathis in the trunk), the plane scene, Bond taking out the MI6 guys in the elevator, Bond escaping the CIA tactical team, the entire Eco Hotel sequence and finally Bond giving Greene the motor oil.
I've watched these movies with girls, and they hated each and every one of these scenes.
Honestly, I agree with this. I don't think there's a damn thing wrong with chicks liking Bond.
Sorry, but as much as I love Roger Moore, he butchered Fleming and Bond far more than CR did.
IMO his 2nd film, TMWTGG, was much closer to Fleming than CR could ever hope to be.