›

How does each actor's 1st, 2nd, 3rd outing rank in terms of Box office ?

DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
edited January 2012 in Bond Movies Posts: 15,718
**Adjusted for Inflation**

First outing :
LALD - Moore
CR - Craig
DN - Connery
GE- Brosnan
OHMSS - Lazenby
TLD- Dalton

Second outing :
FRWL - Connery
QOS- Craig
TND- Brosnan
TMWTGG - Moore
LTK- Dalton

Third outing :
GF - Connery
TSWLM- Moore
TWINE- Brosnan

Fourth outing :
TB- Connery
MR- Moore
DAD - Brosnan

Fifth Outing :
YOLT - Connery
FYEO- Moore

Sixth Outing :
DAF - Connery
OP - Moore

Per decade :

First film :
1960's - DN
1990's - GE
2000's - DAD
1970's - DAF
1980's - FYEO

2nd film :
1960's - FRWL
1970's - LALD
2000's - CR
1990's - TND
1980's - OP

Third film :
1960's - GF
2000's - QOS
1990's - TWINE
1970's - TMWTGG
1980's - AVTAK

Fourth film :
1960's - TB
1970's - TSWLM
1980's - TLD

Fifth film :
1960's - YOLT
1970's MR
1980's LTK

Per director :

First film :
Hamilton - GF
Gilbert - YOLT
Young - DN
Campbell - GE
Forster - QOS
Tamahori - DAD
Spottiswood - TND
Apted - TWINE
Glen - FYEO
Hunt - OHMSS

Second film :
Young - FRWL
Gilbert - TSWLM
Campbell - CR
Hamilton - DAF
Glen - OP

Third film :
Young - TB
Hamilton - LALD
Gilbert - MR
Glen - AVTAK

Fourth film :
Hamilton - TMWTGG
Glen - TLD


Comments

  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    More directors should make multiple Bonds. I wish there was a new Terrance Young on the scene (or, God forbid, Guy Hamilton).
  • OHMSS69OHMSS69
    Posts: 2,341
    I don't quite understand what this all means. In terms of box office, GE was a mammoth block buster as was CR. With inflation adjusted the most successful Bond film of all was TB.
    The lowest grossing film was Connery's first film, DN.As a matter of fact, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (another Fleming book produced by Brocholi and Salzman) outgrossed DN back in 1962...
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Kudos to you for putting all that together @DC007. Very insightful!
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited January 2012 Posts: 15,718
    OHMSS69 wrote:
    I don't quite understand what this all means. In terms of box office, GE was a mammoth block buster as was CR. With inflation adjusted the most successful Bond film of all was TB.
    The lowest grossing film was Connery's first film, DN.As a matter of fact, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (another Fleming book produced by Brocholi and Salzman) outgrossed DN back in 1962...

    DN made 602 millions, DAF made 497 millions.

    Here is the list :

    1) Thunderball: $989,798,019
    2) Goldfinger: $950,851,612
    3) You Only Live Twice: $658,440,000
    4) From Russia With Love: $657,190,588
    5) Live And Let Die: $647,200,000
    6) Casino Royale: $642,322,532
    7) Dr. No: $602,478,011
    8) Moonraker: $593,196,812
    9) The Spy Who Loved Me: $588,624,215
    10) GoldenEye: $580,608,243
    11) Quantum Of Solace: $576,336,563
    12) Die Another Day: $526,359,783
    13) Tomorrow Never Dies: $523,679,798
    14) The World Is Not Enough: $504,144,305
    15) Diamonds Are Forever: $497,745,454
    16) For Your Eyes Only: $497,382,733
    17) Octopussy: $421,428,571
    18) On Her Majesty's Secret Service: $408,845,070
    19) The Man With The Golden Gun: $369,522,994
    20) The Living Daylights: $346,213,810
    21) A View To A Kill: $304,396,044
    22) Licence To Kill: $278,504,399

    Please note that DN outgrossed GE.
  • 00Beast00Beast
    Posts: 4,762
    Nice work DaltonCraig! That's really impressive! It's interesting to see that if a particular Bond movie did well, then its successor does also, but if its predecessor does poorly, then then so does it. Of course that isn't 100% always true, but I noticed how that seems to work out in those lists.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited January 2012 Posts: 4,520
    Casino Royale 600 million
    QOS
    DAD
    TMND
    Twine
    GE
    Moonraker 200 million

    What i like to see is how much people realy watch it. For example if Dr No have 1 million visiters, then in today prices the movie delieverd $ 11 million for this count of visiters and delieverd 11 times so much as the movie cost or delieverd 11 times to much as the set of the last scene of Yolt. Dr No cost $ 1 million to make and that set also cost 1 million to make.

    Iam not sjure but i think DAD god 966.000 visiters to deliever 7,4 million. What i did is take 7,4 million (7400000): 7,75 (price ticket) and get something like this 0,966000 etc.. Because million have 6 numbers i take then the first 6 numbers after the , and 966.000 x 7,75 = 7 million, 485000, 500

    DAD exact delieverd $7,348,890 (7 million, 349000, 890) in The Netherlands in 2003.

    If we take DAD in to 2008 with tickets prices of QOS who cost 10,00 a ticket in 2008 with the same visiters count as DAD (966.000) then DAD it delieverd 9,6 million. QOS box office results be close to 8,8 millionand in in other words DAD is more succesfol Bond movie then QOS. Because QOS have 888.000 visiters. CR need having a litle bit more visiters then 1 million because it deliever more then 10 million but ticket prices be € 9,00.

    Note: from what i know $ and € be even.
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    Posts: 12,837
    DaltonCraig007 wrote:
    OHMSS69 wrote:
    I don't quite understand what this all means. In terms of box office, GE was a mammoth block buster as was CR. With inflation adjusted the most successful Bond film of all was TB.
    The lowest grossing film was Connery's first film, DN.As a matter of fact, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (another Fleming book produced by Brocholi and Salzman) outgrossed DN back in 1962...

    DN made 602 millions, DAF made 497 millions.

    Here is the list :

    1) Thunderball: $989,798,019
    2) Goldfinger: $950,851,612
    3) You Only Live Twice: $658,440,000
    4) From Russia With Love: $657,190,588
    5) Live And Let Die: $647,200,000
    6) Casino Royale: $642,322,532
    7) Dr. No: $602,478,011
    8) Moonraker: $593,196,812
    9) The Spy Who Loved Me: $588,624,215
    10) GoldenEye: $580,608,243
    11) Quantum Of Solace: $576,336,563
    12) Die Another Day: $526,359,783
    13) Tomorrow Never Dies: $523,679,798
    14) The World Is Not Enough: $504,144,305
    15) Diamonds Are Forever: $497,745,454
    16) For Your Eyes Only: $497,382,733
    17) Octopussy: $421,428,571
    18) On Her Majesty's Secret Service: $408,845,070
    19) The Man With The Golden Gun: $369,522,994
    20) The Living Daylights: $346,213,810
    21) A View To A Kill: $304,396,044
    22) Licence To Kill: $278,504,399

    Please note that DN outgrossed GE.

    such a shame that the best bond film is at the bottom of the list
  • VirageVirage
    Posts: 1,856
    Nice @DaltonCraig, Very Nice.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    DaltonCraig007 wrote:
    OHMSS69 wrote:
    I don't quite understand what this all means. In terms of box office, GE was a mammoth block buster as was CR. With inflation adjusted the most successful Bond film of all was TB.
    The lowest grossing film was Connery's first film, DN.As a matter of fact, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (another Fleming book produced by Brocholi and Salzman) outgrossed DN back in 1962...

    DN made 602 millions, DAF made 497 millions.

    Here is the list :

    1) Thunderball: $989,798,019
    2) Goldfinger: $950,851,612
    3) You Only Live Twice: $658,440,000
    4) From Russia With Love: $657,190,588
    5) Live And Let Die: $647,200,000
    6) Casino Royale: $642,322,532
    7) Dr. No: $602,478,011
    8) Moonraker: $593,196,812
    9) The Spy Who Loved Me: $588,624,215
    10) GoldenEye: $580,608,243
    11) Quantum Of Solace: $576,336,563
    12) Die Another Day: $526,359,783
    13) Tomorrow Never Dies: $523,679,798
    14) The World Is Not Enough: $504,144,305
    15) Diamonds Are Forever: $497,745,454
    16) For Your Eyes Only: $497,382,733
    17) Octopussy: $421,428,571
    18) On Her Majesty's Secret Service: $408,845,070
    19) The Man With The Golden Gun: $369,522,994
    20) The Living Daylights: $346,213,810
    21) A View To A Kill: $304,396,044
    22) Licence To Kill: $278,504,399

    Please note that DN outgrossed GE.

    such a shame that the best bond film is at the bottom of the list

    No, CR is #6. ;)
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    Although Dalton's best film is 20th, which I find disappointing.
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    Agent007391 wrote:
    More directors should make multiple Bonds. I wish there was a new Terrance Young on the scene (or, God forbid, Guy Hamilton).

    its no fault of EON.... granted, during the Brosnan run, they wanted a different director each film, to kind of "keep things fresh" as they put it.. but since CR, they've offered returning offers to both Martin Campbell and Marc Forster - both declined..

    they are hoping that Sam Mendes will stick around to do a couple more - as i'm sure they'd like to build some kind of continuity directing wise.... it was hinted during the press conference for Skyfall, when asked if Sam will return for the next film or not.... the decision is ultimately Sam's.. if he likes doing the movie - i'm sure he'll do another.

    i always felt like Campbell really had no interest in doing Bond, other than it could help advance his career.
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    HASEROT wrote:
    Agent007391 wrote:
    More directors should make multiple Bonds. I wish there was a new Terrance Young on the scene (or, God forbid, Guy Hamilton).

    its no fault of EON.... granted, during the Brosnan run, they wanted a different director each film, to kind of "keep things fresh" as they put it.. but since CR, they've offered returning offers to both Martin Campbell and Marc Forster - both declined..

    they are hoping that Sam Mendes will stick around to do a couple more - as i'm sure they'd like to build some kind of continuity directing wise.... it was hinted during the press conference for Skyfall, when asked if Sam will return for the next film or not.... the decision is ultimately Sam's.. if he likes doing the movie - i'm sure he'll do another.

    i always felt like Campbell really had no interest in doing Bond, other than it could help advance his career.

    I wasn't faulting Eon. It's just that the "Keep things fresh" mentality isn't helping, and has indeed hurt the franchise (TWINE, DAD).

    I've never seen one of Mendes' films, but since he seems to genuinely care about Skyfall, I want him to stay on.
Sign In or Register to comment.