It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Great lines, great Connery, excellent story, beautiful girls, amazing soundtrack! TB is just too much Bond!!
I have always regarded TB as one of the weakest Connery films, along with DAF. The great underwater fight and JB's score aside, I don't understand why it is so highly rated. It has one of the worst PTS in the entire series and is a touch on the dull side. Not vintage Bond at all IMO. Have always enjoyed YOLT much more.
I regard it as one of the best PTS! As always, that's only the way I see it...
You voted for GF, yet you call TB dull? TB has the real feeling of risk, and that PTS is action packed awesomeness. Brutal fisticuffs, an escape on jetpack then DB5, versus GF's one explosion and minor scuffle? The only thing it has going for it is Connery is that dinner jacket. Other than that we have Bond in jail, just piffing around in a drudge while Goldfinger goes through the bases of his plan. TB has exotic locales, amazing action on land and sea, and of course some the best one liners the series has to offer. Just the scene where Bond and all the 00s meet up alone beats anything GF serves up.
The jet pack is what ruins the PTS for me. I suddenly feel transported to the world of Thunderbirds.
GF PTS is one of the finest of the series but that does not make a whole film does it?
If we haven't done it already can I suggest YOLT vs. TLD for the next round?
On the other hand, GF is a overrated movie that can't live up to it's reputation.
Not that Goldfinger is all that it's cracked up to be (but it is better than most here seem to give credit for).
By the smallest of margins, I gotta go with Goldfinger.
Ditto. Also, the only Bond film to combine the Terence Young directoral style of the first 2 films with the big budget Panavision epic scale of films like OHMSS, CR and the Lewis Gilbert films. GF is great too but TB has an epicness that outclasses it for me.
Thunderball
For me, neither drag. They're actually very different films in terms of structure. Goldfinger builds and builds until the big Fort Knox finale, whereas Thunderball starts out big, and just keeps on with the same level of scale throughout. When I say I prefer Goldfinger, it's not because I don't like Thunderball. They're both classics, but they're just....different. It's because they differ that I like them both so much, I think.
To me GF has enough entertainment to get me through the actionless parts. Whereas even the action in TB is kinda boring. That underwater finale goes on for what feels like hours.
Good thing Jill makes up for most of it. Shirley was a stunner.
I choose Thunderball
It was a pretty easy decision, at least there's some exciting action bits and pieces that don't send you to sleep, even if the underwater sequences go on a little too long
Come on, it has Claudine Auger and Luciana Paluzzi over Honor Blackman for a start
14. Goldfinger
13. The Living Daylights
12. Live And Let Die
11. Thunderball