It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Dream House went from much promise to mess - that one's a great story and can be found in the Dream House thread.
I've heard of others and hope to dig up what I can...
Good call, Major, should make for fascinating reading.
I think I see what direction we are headed here but am a bit apprehensive as to what to include, there are so many examples as we are aware, one such instance will be a little picture coming later this year for arguments sake..
You could call this a morbid curiosity.
I like both versions, but the straight up one a little more.
I don't remember reading about Nicholson but I remember reading that Kubrick treated Shelly Duvall terribly to get the best performance our of her. I guess she hated the process. And yes, King hated the film, which is why he made that mini-series a few years later. But I guess that didn't hold a candle to the film
The funny thing about Batman and Robin is that it was EXACTLY the movie that Warner Bros wanted it to be and was expecting. They just weren't expecting people to hate it :)
According to Dench's biography the atmosphere was messy. Neither she nor Babara Brocolli got on with Roger Spottiswode. She was expected to learn pages of re-written dialogue at very short notice and recalls an incident involving her and Spottiswode and Babs.
Dench (to Roger); didn't you see me? I almost hit you with the car?
Babs: if only you had accelerated.
Ouch!
That's not including the changing of Elliot Carver's character or the frosty atmosphere between Brosnan and Hatcher.
Funny thing, that poor Kevin Reynolds suffered teh same experience earlier on with the Costner-vehicle "Robin Hood - Prince of Thieves". Reynolds was not allowed to do the final cut, because previews showed, that Alan Rickman's OTT-Sheriff was more popular with the audience as Costner's stiff Robin Hood, so some scenes with Rickman were cut. Oh yeah, and the whole thing was not helpüful with Costner refusing to do dialect coaching, some people laughed so hart and quipped "Would you believe it, a Californian accent in medieval Britain"... What's puzzling me, Reynolds had been sacked by Costner one time, but then he agreed to return as director, only to be fired again by Costner.
I think that this happens more often than not. And the producers are not always wrong some endings do work and others don't. And of course do Producers think moneywise, it is their job. ANd at the end of the day a movie is made to make money and preferable lots of it. If you have any other illusion than the moviemaking business is not something to be discussed.
Spider-man and Spider-man 2 were two amazing superhero movies, though i prefer 2 over the first one for it's deeper storyline (also has a cool soundtrack too lol).. but the studio, feeling the pressure from fans to include Venom, forced Raimi to include him into the film - initially Raimi refused, and only wanted to have Sandman as a central villain, while still having the struggle between Peter and Harry (with Harry obviously becoming the new Goblin).. but he eventually bowed the Sony's wish, but as an FU, he merely made him into a side character, seeing as how there was no room for him in the actual story..... and it's no secret that Raimi, a Spider-man fan, has no love affair for Venom........
the end result of all of this was what we got in Spider-man 3..
Sony wanted Raimi to return, and do 3 more films... Sam reluctantly agreed to do so, but advised that he wanted to have creative control over the stories, and what villains to use and so forth.. Sony agreed on this handshake deal... so Raimi started work on Spider-man 4, with talks of having The Vulture as the main and only villain... then the studio started to stick it's nose back into the mix... some execs made suggestions, about changing the Vulture's sex to female, or him having a female sidekick called Vulturess... these suggestions started to turn back into demands - and before long, Sam Raimi had enough, and quit the project - citing too much studio interference.... on the heels of Raimi quitting, so did Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst... their only reason for wanting to do another Spider-man movie was because of Raimi, with him now gone, they had no reason to stay..
whats weird, is that apparently, the entire time, Sony had hired another writer to write a reboot script... - from the best of my knowledge, this script was written before Raimi eventually signed back on to do a 4th.... Sony kept the script instead of discarding it... so when Raimi walked with his script to Spider-man 4, Sony had a backup plan..... i find this weird, because could this had been Sony's plan all along? To force Raimi out? or was it all happenstance?.. who knows..
so what we got now, is a rebooted Spider-man franchise that is only 10 years old, creatively controled by the studio, and not the director..
it's hard for to be unbias in this whole matter, because I have great respect for Raimi, and I know he takes undue flack for the outcome of Spider-man 3, when if the studio didn't try to take their creative switchblade to it - it's could've turned out much much better..... so, I really do hope the new Spider-man reboot is a critical failure... i know it wont bomb, because it's a successful franchise... but i honestly hope it's just so terrible, that it warrants no future sequels.
Same thing with Salt (imo) based on the plot. One second her face is known by everybody in the World, and the next, she slips into the White House. Suuurreeee.
Oh, Thor and The Green Lantern plummeted, after barely raising off the ground.
i thought the Ang Lee "HULK" movie was an epic failure... i remember being so hyped to see it at the time, but i damn near fell asleep in the theater... and at the end - The Hulk fighting his father in what i like to call a clusterf*** of CGI - and then he's all of sudden frozen in ice........... thank god i've blocked most of that film from memory - but certain things are beyond forgetting.
Resident Evil Afterlife was another waste of $15 for me.. i say $15 because i actually shelled out to see it in 3D.... ugh - not even worth $8 for standard viewing... what a piece of garbage... now i liked the Resident Evil series (for the most part) up to this point... i really liked the first film.. Apocolypse was 'okay' - until the last 20 minutes or so.. and i thought Extinction was pretty good - better than i thought it would be.... but Afterlife was a complete mess..... unless you've played the video games, you'd have no clue where certain things came from - so if you were a fan of the movies, and hadn't played the games from Code Veronica on, you were left completely in the dark - with such things as how Albert Wesker has powers, The Executioner guy, and zombies with tentacles coming from the mouth... yeah... even beyond that, the movie and plot was a disaster - still can't understand how my one friend thinks it's amazing.
The Spirit... I can't remember much about this film, as I only saw it once, and that was in the theater... I guess whenever Frank Miller wants to attempt to make a movie, it's going to always be in Sin City style - which deviated away from the look and tone of the comics of "The Spirit" themselves... i just remember it being obscenely bizarre, and lacking any real flow - it was a mess... the only highlight was Sam Jackson in full Nazi regalia - lol hilarious.
this is my feeling towards Death Bed : The Bed That Eats..
now, it sounds like one of those movies, that is so bad that it is awesome - like any SyFy original movie lol... but don't be fooled - it's so bad, that this film actually had the ability to slow down time.... 40 minutes feels like 2 hours lol.... I've put up with watching a lot of awful movies, as me and some friends occasionally like to do, and riff them apart MST3K style... this one was damn near impossible to finish - it was so bad, that we couldn't have fun with it, and almost turned it off........ you legitimately feel like you're being punished by watching it.
Like 'The Core'... extremely cheesy film, prehistorical CGI, ludicrous plot and incredibly stupid 'scientific' explanations... but the sheer fun of it and the really likable characters really makes this film golden...
Megashark vs Giant Octopus
Megashark vs Crocosaurus
Mega Python vs Gatoroid
Titanic 2
2010: Moby Dick
Mega Piranha
Blue Demon
these are of the "so bad they are hilarious" variety... horrible CGI, horrible contrived plots, horrible acting.. horrible locations - such as a random factory that is supposed to be a high tech US military installation... these are B movie gems that can't go unwatched lol.... so grab some beers, and some mates - and throw on one of these, you will not be disappointed lol.
ha ha ha.
I like Thief DC007 - Lee's Hulk was great loved it...I thought Salt was a cracking dumb action movie...
I hated mi2 - How did Woo get it so wong?