It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
If you hunt around the forums, you'll see the majority of the crew, including Craig, Eve, and Solange are all heading to Turkey. Also, there have been rumors of Solange and possibly Bardem's henchmen in Shanghai.
So yes. They will travel.
If I were Bond, I'd like to travel too...(meaning a handsome actor playing Bond). But we'll see how all this ties into the story.
Just hoping it won't be a movie full of Die Another Day-esque Hong Kong type of easy to spot backdrops.
Just watched MI4 and rewatched MI3 the last days. Talk about great and proper use of locations. In MI3 you actually get to see Shanghai and Hunt doing stuff there - running, jumping, chasing on the streets, the harbour, from the top of actual buildings etc. We now know that all they will use Shanghai for in SF are some exterior shots - the rest will be shot in England. So much for Bond "visiting" China!
Another thing that concerns me, is that we - over two months into shooting - haven't seen a single photo or clapperboard-picture featuring any kind of action what so ever. We know that there will be a huge set-piece featuring trains in Turkey, but that's it? I think that a Bond-movie should have at least three exterior action set-pieces.
- train sequence
-Damien Walters has to be there for some action sequence
-the supposed final action sequence
-from an extra: "I didn't do much...just walked down the sidewalk as they filmed a sportscar racing down the street.
I am sure, I am missing something, so its clear, this is far from being actionpoor.
1) Quantum of Solace had a reported $230 million budget. If you cut that by $50 million, it'd still be $180 million. If you cut it by $80 million, it'd be $150 million.
2. Skyfall is taking on higher priced talent (Mendes and Logan behind the camera, Bardem in front of it). It *may* be that there have been tradeoffs.
3. Listen to the Roger Spottiswoode commentary on the Tomorrow Never Dies DVD, and he talks about how, despite that film's large budget for the time, they had to economize here and there. He mentions how one set doubled for 2 or 3 different interiors. They took a basic set and "dressed" it differently.
Yes, SEEN, but how much does that tell? Obviously, this time around, there is a lot, we don't SEE.
Solange? Don't you mean Severine? Solange was the obligatory sacrificial lamb in CR.
True, but you were complaining, as if the film is already shot.
Yep. If you watch the initial press conference closely, Sam Mendes says "we will be shooting...." then he pauses and re-phrases it as "Bond's journey takes him to china, Turkey and Scotland."
This suggests two things to me:
(1) They already knew back then that they wouldn't be doing any shooting with the main cast in China.
(2) I suspect that Sam Mendes, probably in collaboration with the producers, had planned carefully how to phrase the mention of the locations, so as to hide the fact that the main shooting is only in UK and Turkey.
(PS I'm not necessarily complaining, I'm just making those points)
Not sure, but I'd bet that even considering inflation adjustment, Dr No would still have had a smaller budget.
Quite the opposite, it would still be the sixth most expensive of the series. Not counting inflation only the the last three films cost more to be made, so hardly any difference.
A good believable story married in with action that befits it is the key?
I'm guessing that is not accurate.
Bond films do get a percentage of the budget from product placement deals, and the Bond franchise has made billions so it's hard to think any Bond film would be stingy with the budget. Perhaps Daniel Craig's 100 million dollars fee demand was a bit too excessive? :D
Perhaps they were given a check of 200 Million, but urged to save wherever possible.
Thats most likely why they've cut so many locations and resorted to back-lotting. IMO, if it looks just as good as the real location, just cheaper, why not save a buck or two.
Perhaps they can persuade Connery and the rest of the old gang to make an appearance with the leftover cash!
do people believe that every single moment, in each of films spent in a location, that that is where they really where? - or did we forget all those blue screen background inserts.. i'd hedge an educated guess that the vast majority (65%-75%) were filmed at Pinewood or in some studio location..
moving large film crews from country to country can be expensive.