It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I meant 'in-depth' , thanks for poiting it out to me!
Just like the movie...
Really? And I felt Bond was back.
We both know QoS needed to be LONGER and not shorter @OHMSS69. It's already the shortest of the franchise. You want an even smaller film then do you?? :O
I wonder how much of the shortness/choppiness was because of the writers' strike and Forster/Craig scrambling to make the best of a chaotic script situations.
It's a shame actually as it's not a bad movie overall. I think another 5 to 10 mins in the running time and some longer scenes and it would have worked much better. Choppy hand-held camera work also slightly dizzying in some of the action sequences.