It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
But I can see where it sucks as a serious Bond movie.
Yeah, having said that, I can accept when something that I hold so close and dear to me may have flaws and/or issues, as well.
2. MR
3. DAF
4. TMWTGG
5. AVTAK
Yes, the Hall Of Silly shame. Still, each entertaining in their own ways.
Mostly.
MR
DAF
DAD
MR just could not leave silliness alone. Even that great PTS has to end on a silly joke involving Jaws (why was he even in the sequence?).
DAD was not too bad the first act or so, but when they get to the Ice Palace that is when the movie slips into ....
MR never takes itself too seriously same can be said for DAF but DAD ... why were they trying to take the entire film so serious? The lasers, Jinz's crappy dialogue, Brosnan's seduction of Miranda, invisible car, finally the surfing scene...THEY WERE TAKING THIS TRASH SO SERIOUSLY.
DAF, mainly because of how much it flipped the bird at OHMSS.
I wouldn't say AVTAK because of the good flute-busting and the rest of the soundtrack. It really feels 80's watching it compared to other Glenn films which emphasized the culture of their locations more.
TMWTGG felt like a Saturday afternoon matinee or tv movie one would watch from boredom. Really it almost killed the series. Something my favorite movie with its dramatic scenes never almost did.
One thing from MR that never gets mentioned is when Bond is being attacked in the Bondola, an enemy boat passes Bond with a coffin on it. A guy opens the lid and proceeds to throw knives at Bond. The part that amuses me the most is that this guy has white makeup on to look dead. What purpose does this serve, other than the mortician saving a bit of time and effort preparing him for his funeral? :))
Because other than a few moments of silliness, Octopussy is a decent Bond movie that has something for all kinds of fans.
There are far more worse offenders in the series.
A hollowed out volcano.
One of Bonds arch villains resorting to dressing in drag, and Bond not seeking revenge for the murder of his wife.
A city in space that no-one knows is there.
Bond driving an invisible car.
Bumping into a Louisiana Sheriff in Bangkok and have him in an AMC showroom in said city, whilst OO7 is in pursuit of a villain. How silly can you get?
For one or two faults, OP is hardly the silliest Bond movie going.
The key word is "unitentionally". MR was meant to be silly. It was a film made by adults for kids, whereas the Brosnan films, and especially DAD, seem like they were made by kids for adults.
A space station constructed without any knowledge from anyone on earth. Plausible?
Unless the first part of the station was the radar jamming component, then I think someone may have spotted it orbiting the earth.
And how many shuttle missions would it have taken to construct?
I like MR for it's brilliance and can turn a blind eye and go along for the ride. But it is OTT silly as far as you can get.
Yes, good point there.
DAD INTENDED to be good, so it's NOT okay it that was crap.
I get it now...
Yes, exactly. You know, like when you post here and intend it to be a silly post. Works out great, as you and I know. Then you have those who are serious about what they post, and it still turns out silly. (You know who you are. Well, probably not...) That means it is a failure at what it attempted to achieve. Not defending MR, by all means. Just bashing the Brosnan films as usual. ;)
If it's intending to SEEM like crap PRETENDING to be good yet being GOOD at being crap, it's okay, UNLESS Brosnan's in it, in which case it's crap in ANY case.
Thanks for clearing that up.
:-B
Communication is my speciality!
Agreed. Moore was way too old in this, but it's still one of my favorite Bond adventures.
I think one mans silliness is anothers entertainment, is where the real heart of the issue lies, but have to draw a line at certain points of the series, such as the Bondola Saint Marks Square nonsense in Moonraker (double take pigeon et al) and the Jungle hunt from Octopussy. Got to include the fire truck sequence from AVTAK for good measure
Poor Fleming would of been spinning like a top..
Don't forget the water jets from the back of the Aston Martin. spraying water on gunmen who are on foot. Why not just drive away?
After the fight with Beauvert the jetpack and the Aston Martin caused the PTS to fall into silliness.
Dude, cinematic Bond is silly. It's only the degrees that separate us as fans of Fleming.
I don't think you were harsh. I liked OP but it has its silly moments, but still enjoyable.
The scenes in the PTS of TB is the point where the series start to take gadgets to the level of silliness. It would not end with TB and we would be treated to a mishmash of silly cutesy gadgetry.
It was really the Moore era that took gadgets past outlandish and into silly though, IMO.
CR
FRWL
QOS
LTK
SF
OHMSS
FYEO
TLD
DN
TB
GE
GF
TND
TWINE
YOLT
OP
LALD
TSWLM
AVTAK
TMWTGG
DAF
DAD
MR