It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
What?
Many of your points are fair, and like I wrote earlier, NSNA not a perfect film by any means, but it feel for more entertaining and interesting and much closer to a serious tone than OP. I much prefer TB to NSNA, but there's some good direction in NSNA that carries the weight the the guy who directed Empire Strikes back, and none of the outright silliness of the Moore film. Understand there are those who like OP a lot, but the comedy really sinks that film, for me.
Undoubtly it is a more serious tone than OP. I like OP, if you take it for what it is it's really enjoyable, it manages to rank in the middle for me. Yes NSNA does have its high points, just like any other Bond film, it just was one that I never caught onto when I was younger. Tbh, of the 3 unofficial films, I find myself enjoying CR 1954 than I do the other two.
I think you may have slightly misinterpreted what I said, gentlemen. I don't have a huge amount of love for Octopussy either really.
I simply think NSNA was an exercise in futility. Bringing Sean back was great on paper, but in practice it was pointless. Remember by this point we had already seen him in several films hairless and sporting the white moustache/beard combination that became his look in his later films. My critiques of NSNA are just that, not a vain attempt to say that OP was a Bond classic. I merely used the point of who was aging better at the time between him and Roger, and that was just one reason that I disliked NSNA.
That being said now the comparison between the two films has been brought into the conversation I will say I am far more likely to rewatch OP than NSNA. It is still firmly in the lower echelon of the EON productions for me, though.
Hannes Oberhauser was killed.
What's even stranger is that EON seems to KNOW that Binder's original design is iconic - it was all over Skyfall's marketing campaign and even appears in the 50th anniversary logo directly after the gun barrel in the actual film (see below). Surely Binder's design deserved to be part of the actual gun barrel, as well? It's all very puzzling.
+1.
Connery, Lazenby, Moore and Dalton are all the same guy.
Brosnan and Craig both have their own timelines.
+1.
Ah but that Bernard Lee portrait in TWINE...
NSNA doesn't really deserve all the flak it gets and more (Moore?) Connery as Bond can never be a bad thing. EON or not.
So, to all the NSNA hate:
So in that case a Connery cameo in DAD would have been absolutely fine??
(*ducks for cover*)
It's not to be taken literally.
I know but what I'm saying is it can be one timeline, had Craig been in the same timeline it would be impossible but because he's not it works
Well said. I've always loved NSNA. Much of the flak NSNA receives has been repeated in later films, especially in the Craig era. I agree Sean is far more engaged in the part here than in YOLT or DAF. That 12 year break really charged his batteries, and he's great as a retired Bond who can bed one lady, be chased by sharks underwater, then bed another moments later. He's the man!
Both times it took me out of the film. I was surprised DC chose to do this, as if it was showing how "involved" and "desperate" he was in both scenes.
As most know I love DC. He's right up their with King Connery. But I was bothered by this approach and I actually found it... lazy acting:(
He was most like his old self at L'Americaine and at White's, and I quite liked his performance in both spots.
I kind of wish Craig had a more subtle response when Madeline is being shown her father's suicide. Possibly something more like Roger's when Howe is shot by Zorin and Stacey latches on to him for that moment. Both sequences involve Bond and his leading lady in an intense situation with the main villain, but Roger keeps his cool.
I just couldn't stand the dramatic shrieks of DC in SP; it wasn't effective , and as @bondjames stated, went against DC's style and approach
It is a top notch performance in many ways, but I did find him quite uncredible in the film overall due to age. The same went for many of the others too (Macnee, Maxwell etc.). It was most notable at Ascot.