›

Controversial opinions about Bond films

1…314315317319320…707

Comments

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Poorly executed. We were supposed to be frightened as Bond makes his entrance to that valley of death. But, it was just a typical meeting scene. Sorry, Sam, but that was poorly directed.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    I thought it was excellent. It's no TB, but then what is? Tosca is fine, but very arty farty. If I were sat next one of the Quantum members I'd be pretty f***ed off at them rabbiting away into an ear piece. Surely getting the message over that Bolivia is top priority can be done in a less contrived and simplistic manner? It's a fun scene, but I don't see how it is any better than the equivalent in SP. My only regret is that the atmosphere they created doesn't permeate a little more of the film, particularly with Waltz.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    Poorly executed. We were supposed to be frightened as Bond makes his entrance to that valley of death. But, it was just a typical meeting scene. Sorry, Sam, but that was poorly directed.

    The scene wants to to be TB. But its not.
  • BT3366BT3366
    Posts: 1,926
    I like the scene. Not sure it was meant to be like the TB meeting scene as that wasn't a mass affair like this was, just a few high-ranking members.

    The atmosphere is there and it's quite memorable and an SP highlight for me. I also enjoy the QoS and TB meetings. Maybe I just like meeting scenes.

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    edited May 2017 Posts: 15,423
    I got the vibes from the trailer it wanted to be an Eyes Wide Shut type of thing. And honestly, I would love to see Bond fighting those types of villains. But, it was just another meeting scene with low lights. Seems Spectre is economically sparing some budget to pay the bills. :))
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2017 Posts: 23,883
    It really was the pacing that threw me off. I was sitting in the theatre wondering what the point was. I assumed it was meant to be suspenseful, but it was just dull to me, apart from Hinx's appearance. I almost felt like either film makers didn't realize how boring it was, or I was missing something.

    Sadly, the money shot "Welcome James" had already been overexposed in the trailers (idiots), further ruining the sequence.

    The Eyes Wide Shut sequence was incredible. Different league entirely.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    bondjames wrote: »
    It really was the pacing that threw me off. I was sitting in the theatre wondering what the point was. I assumed it was meant to be suspenseful, but it was just dull to me, apart from Hinx's appearance. I almost felt like either film makers didn't realize how boring it was, or I was missing something.

    Sadly, the money shot "Welcome James" had already been overexposed in the trailers (idiots), further ruining the sequence.

    The Eyes Wide Shut sequence was incredible. Different league entirely.
    +1
  • CrzChris4CrzChris4
    Posts: 463
    I dislike that Waltz wouldn't even move his own microphone, yet he's doing all the brunt work towards the end of the film.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Budget cuts. :))
  • Some_Kind_Of_HeroSome_Kind_Of_Hero
    Posts: 6,844
    CrzChris4 wrote: »
    I dislike that Waltz wouldn't even move his own microphone, yet he's doing all the brunt work towards the end of the film.

    Little known fact: Christoph Waltz has abnormally weak forearms. Any heavy lifting you see Waltz do in the second half of the film (typing on his keyboard, gesturing with his hands, drawing a heart on the glass)—CGI, all of it.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    So he's kind of like the Mr. Burns version of Blofeld then? It all makes sense now.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    bondjames wrote: »
    The Eyes Wide Shut sequence was incredible. Different league entirely.


    Definitely...SPECTRE's meeting doesn't even come close to that or TB.

  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,218
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    I got the vibes from the trailer it wanted to be an Eyes Wide Shut type of thing. And honestly, I would love to see Bond fighting those types of villains. But, it was just another meeting scene with low lights. Seems Spectre is economically sparing some budget to pay the bills. :))

    It's not the only scene of SP that emulates Kubrick. And it also had something of Dr Strangelove. I liked it personally.

    Anyway the whole movie is full of Kubrick's imagery.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Ludovico wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    I got the vibes from the trailer it wanted to be an Eyes Wide Shut type of thing. And honestly, I would love to see Bond fighting those types of villains. But, it was just another meeting scene with low lights. Seems Spectre is economically sparing some budget to pay the bills. :))

    It's not the only scene of SP that emulates Kubrick. And it also had something of Dr Strangelove. I liked it personally.

    Anyway the whole movie is full of Kubrick's imagery.
    Definitely. As a homage to Kubrick, I find it a dismal attempt to be so. But, on a separate note without trying to connect myself to what I hoped to see from the trailers, it's a likable set of imagery in its overall form.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Controversial opinion - TB is a perfect Bond film in every way.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Controversial opinion - TB is a perfect Bond film in every way.

    Sounds good to me !!

    +1

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Controversial opinion - TB is a perfect Bond film in every way.

    Even Leiter s magic pants?
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,218
    barryt007 wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Controversial opinion - TB is a perfect Bond film in every way.

    Sounds good to me !!

    +1

    +2
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 11,189
    bondjames wrote: »
    Berenice on Craig Ferguson. Quite a babe. I don't know how he kept his hands off her:

    Her voice is a tad too masculine for me but....ummm....that body and her hands <3
  • noSolaceleftnoSolaceleft
    Posts: 1,162
    Hands?!?
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    @BAIN123, I love her voice. Quite sexy imho.
    ---
    Ludovico wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Controversial opinion - TB is a perfect Bond film in every way.

    Sounds good to me !!

    +1

    +2
    Thirded.
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 11,189
    noSolaceleft wrote: »
    Hands?!?

    They look quite seductive (the way she holds the chair arms and grabs Ferguson's tie :)

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2017 Posts: 23,883
    Controversial opinion: She made more of an impact in that one scene just looking at Bond across skyscrapers (let alone at the casino where she aced it) than Lea Seydoux did in the whole of SP.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Controversial opinion - TB is a perfect Bond film in every way.

    On paper - yes. In execution - no.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    RC7 wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Controversial opinion - TB is a perfect Bond film in every way.

    On paper - yes. In execution - no.

    In what areas ?

  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    @bondjames , that's not a controversial opinion in my eyes.

    Severine, with little screen time, is my favourite Bond girl outside of Vesper, in the modern era.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I agree @peter. Both instantly memorable from first sighting in that alluring yet smart Bondian manner.
  • noSolaceleftnoSolaceleft
    Posts: 1,162
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    noSolaceleft wrote: »
    Hands?!?

    They look quite seductive (the way she holds the chair arms and grabs Ferguson's tie :)

    sounds reasonable to me. Especially the tie thing
  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    Posts: 3,000
    RC7 wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Controversial opinion - TB is a perfect Bond film in every way.

    On paper - yes. In execution - no.

    Yep. Loads of spectacle for a lot of meh.
  • CrzChris4CrzChris4
    Posts: 463
    I agree - TB is littered wifh some of my favorite Connery Bond moments but the film's long, dreadful pace doesn't do the film any favors. I think being told SPECTRE's plan and then watching Bond have to play catch up doesn't really help either. The film would have benefitted from losing an extra 10-15 minutes of film to tighten up the pace. But from what I've read, Hunt had his work cut out for him in post production so it's understandable.
Sign In or Register to comment.