Controversial opinions about Bond films

1686687689691692707

Comments

  • jobo wrote: »
    The weakness of OHMSS is definitely when Bond arrives at the Piz Gloria. As beautiful as the location is, the akward attempts at humor with the girls do not sit well with me. And it draaaags... The scenes with Ruby are just plain bad. They could have cut maybe ten minutes of this segment and I would like the film much better. The action though, when it finally kicks in, is iconic of course.

    Yeah, that's my bombshell controversial opinion for today. Now go ahead and collectively sue me! ;)

    We agree it doesn’t work here, especially because he’s just fallen ostensibly in love. Also, note that this is the section where Diana Rigg is absent. No one to carry Lazenby here. So it lags. Until the action

  • MinionMinion Don't Hassle the Bond
    Posts: 1,165
    jobo wrote: »
    The weakness of OHMSS is definitely when Bond arrives at the Piz Gloria. As beautiful as the location is, the akward attempts at humor with the girls do not sit well with me. And it draaaags... The scenes with Ruby are just plain bad. They could have cut maybe ten minutes of this segment and I would like the film much better. The action though, when it finally kicks in, is iconic of course.

    Yeah, that's my bombshell controversial opinion for today. Now go ahead and collectively sue me! ;)

    We agree it doesn’t work here, especially because he’s just fallen ostensibly in love. Also, note that this is the section where Diana Rigg is absent. No one to carry Lazenby here. So it lags. Until the action
    IMHO, at that point in the story only Tracy has fallen in love with Bond. He only reciprocates those feelings when they’re hiding out in the cabin after escaping Blofeld’s goons.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    Yes, she falls in love with him because he takes her horse-riding and walks through some ornamental gardens (I really don't like that montage! :D )
  • MinionMinion Don't Hassle the Bond
    Posts: 1,165
    mtm wrote: »
    Yes, she falls in love with him because he takes her horse-riding and walks through some ornamental gardens (I really don't like that montage! :D )

    It’s the cat petting that really did it. ;)
  • edited October 2021 Posts: 1,596
    Minion wrote: »
    jobo wrote: »
    The weakness of OHMSS is definitely when Bond arrives at the Piz Gloria. As beautiful as the location is, the akward attempts at humor with the girls do not sit well with me. And it draaaags... The scenes with Ruby are just plain bad. They could have cut maybe ten minutes of this segment and I would like the film much better. The action though, when it finally kicks in, is iconic of course.

    Yeah, that's my bombshell controversial opinion for today. Now go ahead and collectively sue me! ;)

    We agree it doesn’t work here, especially because he’s just fallen ostensibly in love. Also, note that this is the section where Diana Rigg is absent. No one to carry Lazenby here. So it lags. Until the action
    IMHO, at that point in the story only Tracy has fallen in love with Bond. He only reciprocates those feelings when they’re hiding out in the cabin after escaping Blofeld’s goons.

    Not sure I agree. I think the "All the Time in the World" montage is meant to do a lot of heavy lifting to suggest that this is absolutely something beyond Bond's typical relationship with a woman.

    For example, when she shows up when all appears to be lost at the ice rink. This is the first we've seen of her since the montage, and it's before the barn scene. They have very little time together between the montage and the barn scene. At the ice rink The framing, Lazenby's attempt at a revelatory expression, etc. they all suggest something much beyond attraction/casual romance

    We'll have to disagree here. I think Bond is, at the very least, falling for her in a way he hasn't with most other women.
  • MinionMinion Don't Hassle the Bond
    edited October 2021 Posts: 1,165
    With the ice rink scene, I've always felt Bond was just happy to see a friendly face when his back was up against the wall. It's from there he falls in love with the woman who saved his life. Not to say he didn't like Tracy before, but I believe that's the moment he realizes she's someone special.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    Minion wrote: »
    With the ice rink scene, I've always felt Bond was just happy to see a friendly face when his back was up against the wall. It's from there he falls in love with the woman who saved his life. Not to say he didn't like Tracy before, but I believe that's the moment he realizes she's someone special.

    Yeah I agree: Tracy falls for him first and then he falls for her when she saves him in Switzerland. She even says she knows as much to her father in the back of the Rolls earlier in the film.
  • MinionMinion Don't Hassle the Bond
    edited October 2021 Posts: 1,165
    Of course, I forgot all about that! I'm paraphrasing here, but if I remember correctly Draco asks her if Bond loves her in the same way she loves him, and Tracy's response is, "That may come too."
  • That is a good point. I still find the womanizing leaves a bad taste in my mouth in OHMSS, but not as much as the wardrobe/how much the film drags there.
  • Posts: 2,402
    Given the way the villain ranking game is going, with him either coming second to Goldfinger or winning outright, I suppose my long time opinion that Sanchez is the series' greatest villain isn't quite as controversial as I thought... or as it used to be :)) :)) :))
  • slide_99slide_99 USA
    Posts: 693
    Lazenby is the only Bond who doesn't look like an actor playing a role. He actually seems like he could walk into a room, kick everyone's ass, and walk out with a girl. Not that good at actually "acting," but whatever, he's like a real-life Bond.
  • Posts: 1,917
    That is a good point. I still find the womanizing leaves a bad taste in my mouth in OHMSS, but not as much as the wardrobe/how much the film drags there.
    I like those scenes, classic Bond. He's in the lion's den with the flimsiest of disguises and no outside help, really; Campbell pretty much blows it by getting captured. But Bond is also surrounded by beautiful women and that nails his getting into trouble. It's got both suspense and romance.
    Given the way the villain ranking game is going, with him either coming second to Goldfinger or winning outright, I suppose my long time opinion that Sanchez is the series' greatest villain isn't quite as controversial as I thought... or as it used to be :)) :)) :))

    Glad to see Sanchez getting some overdue recognition. He's been underrated for some time. More complex than your average megalomaniac who populates the series.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    edited October 2021 Posts: 6,304
    BT3366 wrote: »
    That is a good point. I still find the womanizing leaves a bad taste in my mouth in OHMSS, but not as much as the wardrobe/how much the film drags there.
    I like those scenes, classic Bond. He's in the lion's den with the flimsiest of disguises and no outside help, really; Campbell pretty much blows it by getting captured. But Bond is also surrounded by beautiful women and that nails his getting into trouble. It's got both suspense and romance.

    And Ruby is hilarious! Hunt definitely knew to surround Lazenby with good actors.

    I think I'm in the minority but I prefer Irma Bunt to Rosa Klebb.
  • Posts: 1,394
    Ludovico wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Seve wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    He's the best of the 60s Blofeld, yet there's something lacking. Not sure what.
    And I agree about Roger Moore. He would have been great for OHMSS.

    I just watched this again the other night, IMO Tele is let down by some of the dialogue he's given.
    But Tele doesn't really need much dialogue to get across, he just had a natural presence that suggested a tough guy, unlike the other actors who have played the role, and Fleming wrote him as as powerfully built in YOLT.

    I also agree about Roger being perfect for Piz Gloria, and he got to appear in his share of action ski scenes in TSWLM pre credit sequence and FYEO. (I was just thinking the other day that Connery might be the only Bond who never saw snow action?)

    I attribute the above average fight sequences in OHMSS more to the quality of the direction and camera work, although Lazenby certainly performed his end with great gusto.

    That might be it. Also I never found very believable that Blofeld would fall for Tracy's ruse at the climax.

    Oh how strongly I disagree! I think Diana Rigg could charm the paint off the wall...
    Nothing g to do with Diana Rigg. I don't think Blofeld would have been fooled.

    Even the most intelligent people can act foolishly when they are charmed by an alluring woman.Never had any problem believing Blofeld would fall for Traceys ruse.

    Mary Goodnight on the other hand...well I think even she would fail to fool Blofeld.

  • Posts: 1,917
    echo wrote: »
    BT3366 wrote: »
    That is a good point. I still find the womanizing leaves a bad taste in my mouth in OHMSS, but not as much as the wardrobe/how much the film drags there.
    I like those scenes, classic Bond. He's in the lion's den with the flimsiest of disguises and no outside help, really; Campbell pretty much blows it by getting captured. But Bond is also surrounded by beautiful women and that nails his getting into trouble. It's got both suspense and romance.

    And Ruby is hilarious! Hunt definitely knew to surround Lazenby with good actors.

    I think I'm in the minority but I prefer Irma Bunt to Rosa Klebb.

    That's one to ponder. Both are very much alike and directly involved in the action. Klebb disappears for the middle section and shows fear when it all comes down. Bunt is cunning and not afraid to supervise the minions. It did make me curious as to her whereabouts when Draco and his men invade Piz Gloria. And to possibly nail it, she's literally the one who pulls the trigger that shatters Bond's world.

    Echo, you just may have swayed me to your side on this.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    I think Klebb is played perhaps slightly better in the films, but you might be right about Bunt being the more effective.
    I think bringing her back is a cool idea.
  • Posts: 1,394
    BT3366 wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    BT3366 wrote: »
    That is a good point. I still find the womanizing leaves a bad taste in my mouth in OHMSS, but not as much as the wardrobe/how much the film drags there.
    I like those scenes, classic Bond. He's in the lion's den with the flimsiest of disguises and no outside help, really; Campbell pretty much blows it by getting captured. But Bond is also surrounded by beautiful women and that nails his getting into trouble. It's got both suspense and romance.

    And Ruby is hilarious! Hunt definitely knew to surround Lazenby with good actors.

    I think I'm in the minority but I prefer Irma Bunt to Rosa Klebb.

    That's one to ponder. Both are very much alike and directly involved in the action. Klebb disappears for the middle section and shows fear when it all comes down. Bunt is cunning and not afraid to supervise the minions. It did make me curious as to her whereabouts when Draco and his men invade Piz Gloria. And to possibly nail it, she's literally the one who pulls the trigger that shatters Bond's world.

    Echo, you just may have swayed me to your side on this.

    In my head canon,she’s the one who breaks Blofeld out of prison shortly before Bonds wedding.I know some have mentioned how it seems like Bond didn’t check to see Blofeld was dead after the bobsleigh chase,but I always assumed they brought him in to custody shortly afterwards.

  • Posts: 230
    There are people who don't like the All the Time in the World montage? C'mon
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,634
    mtm wrote: »
    I think Klebb is played perhaps slightly better in the films, but you might be right about Bunt being the more effective.
    I think bringing her back is a cool idea.

    I also agree with bringing her back. She’s the one villain ally in general who could be a great main villain in their own right. Two names that I can think of to play her would be Diane Lane and Winona Ryder. Not the biggest names, but they could be effective. Along with Blofeld, she is one of the top 5 villains I would bring back. The other 3 are Goldfinger, Mr. Big and Alec Trevelyan.
  • Posts: 7,507
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I think Klebb is played perhaps slightly better in the films, but you might be right about Bunt being the more effective.
    I think bringing her back is a cool idea.

    I also agree with bringing her back. She’s the one villain ally in general who could be a great main villain in their own right. Two names that I can think of to play her would be Diane Lane and Winona Ryder. Not the biggest names, but they could be effective. Along with Blofeld, she is one of the top 5 villains I would bring back. The other 3 are Goldfinger, Mr. Big and Alec Trevelyan.


    I think they should wait with Bunt. Sooner or later they will want to reintroduce Blofeld and SPECTRE, that is more or less inevitable. I just hope they have the sense to wait for a while and don't rush it. And in that case Bunt is the perfect career to introduce the organization with. Let's say we discover her in the first film and her boss in the second.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    CountJohn wrote: »
    There are people who don't like the All the Time in the World montage? C'mon

    I’ve always found it quite clumsy: Tracy doesn’t want to see Bond, she runs off, he wipes her face and says a platitude, -montage- she’s head over heels in love with him.
    It just feels like it replaces a believable progression in their relationship with ‘and now she loves him’ to me. Bond falling in love with her is a bit more better-handled.
  • Posts: 1,630
    Here's an opinion for you: Tracy and Bond actually hear Louis Armstrong singing, too. Not entirely throughout the montage, with portable speakers, for example, but here and there. It's "their song" and was played at the wedding and they danced to it. Also, when Blofeld learned that Bond had gotten married -- MARRIED !!!???!!! -- he was torn with a variety of emotions. Happy for Bond. Angry with Bond -- "NO INVITATION ?!!?" Cried some, and not only because of the news. "How could Bond not have come back to me, to see if I was OK ? There I was, hanging by my head on that cursed branch, and...(sniff)...he did not come back to me..." In the end, the offense of not being invited was too much. Notice that he did not pull the trigger himself, though. It was not only because he had been injured, but because He. just. Coud. Not. Bring. Himself. To. Do. It.
  • Posts: 15,123
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Seve wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    He's the best of the 60s Blofeld, yet there's something lacking. Not sure what.
    And I agree about Roger Moore. He would have been great for OHMSS.

    I just watched this again the other night, IMO Tele is let down by some of the dialogue he's given.
    But Tele doesn't really need much dialogue to get across, he just had a natural presence that suggested a tough guy, unlike the other actors who have played the role, and Fleming wrote him as as powerfully built in YOLT.

    I also agree about Roger being perfect for Piz Gloria, and he got to appear in his share of action ski scenes in TSWLM pre credit sequence and FYEO. (I was just thinking the other day that Connery might be the only Bond who never saw snow action?)

    I attribute the above average fight sequences in OHMSS more to the quality of the direction and camera work, although Lazenby certainly performed his end with great gusto.

    That might be it. Also I never found very believable that Blofeld would fall for Tracy's ruse at the climax.

    Oh how strongly I disagree! I think Diana Rigg could charm the paint off the wall...
    Nothing g to do with Diana Rigg. I don't think Blofeld would have been fooled.

    Even the most intelligent people can act foolishly when they are charmed by an alluring woman.Never had any problem believing Blofeld would fall for Traceys ruse.

    Mary Goodnight on the other hand...well I think even she would fail to fool Blofeld.

    No I do think it's out of character. I always imagined him puritanical anyway. Even his smoking in movies irks me somewhat.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    Ludovico wrote: »
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Seve wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    He's the best of the 60s Blofeld, yet there's something lacking. Not sure what.
    And I agree about Roger Moore. He would have been great for OHMSS.

    I just watched this again the other night, IMO Tele is let down by some of the dialogue he's given.
    But Tele doesn't really need much dialogue to get across, he just had a natural presence that suggested a tough guy, unlike the other actors who have played the role, and Fleming wrote him as as powerfully built in YOLT.

    I also agree about Roger being perfect for Piz Gloria, and he got to appear in his share of action ski scenes in TSWLM pre credit sequence and FYEO. (I was just thinking the other day that Connery might be the only Bond who never saw snow action?)

    I attribute the above average fight sequences in OHMSS more to the quality of the direction and camera work, although Lazenby certainly performed his end with great gusto.

    That might be it. Also I never found very believable that Blofeld would fall for Tracy's ruse at the climax.

    Oh how strongly I disagree! I think Diana Rigg could charm the paint off the wall...
    Nothing g to do with Diana Rigg. I don't think Blofeld would have been fooled.

    Even the most intelligent people can act foolishly when they are charmed by an alluring woman.Never had any problem believing Blofeld would fall for Traceys ruse.

    Mary Goodnight on the other hand...well I think even she would fail to fool Blofeld.

    No I do think it's out of character. I always imagined him puritanical anyway. Even his smoking in movies irks me somewhat.

    Ooh that is a good point, I kind of agree with that.

    Would he agree with having a lovely little pet cat? :)
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,188
    Telly Savalas does come off as just playing himself rather than feeling like Blofeld. He’s not exactly a versatile actor but he does have presence.
  • Posts: 631
    IDK how controversial this is but I think I would have preferred it if Telly Savalas had just played a one-off villain, rather than Blofeld.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    Telly Savalas does come off as just playing himself rather than feeling like Blofeld. He’s not exactly a versatile actor but he does have presence.

    That's a fair point too. I think he's an excellent villain but you're probably right that he's not much like the Blofeld from the books or the one we know so far. I don't mind though.
  • Posts: 2,918
    I guess I’ll finally say it: I think CASINO ROYALE is a bit overrated. It’s funny, because I have it placed on #5, but I rank it #2 as far as Craig’s films are concerned. What brings the film down for me is the entire sinking building set piece. I think it’s a complete distraction from what’s going on between Bond and Vesper. I want to feel all betrayal Bond is processing, but hey check him out shoot a nail into this bloke’s eye!

    EON never would have done it, and I can’t blame them for not doing it, but I would have liked the last 20-30 minutes resemble more like the last few chapters of Fleming’s novel with the downward spiral between Bond and Vesper before the suicide. Probably unrealistic, because Bond FILM fans and audiences in general expect the big climaxes, so it would have been jarring to see the last stretch of the film be a melodrama.

    I pretty much agree with you. CR was a much deserved critical and popular success, but it's not perfect. The film's structure is broken-backed and the acts fit together awkwardly. The problem stems from adapting a hardboiled noir novel, with a bitter ending, into a modern action film. The sinking building is problematic for all the reasons you've given, and the end of Bond and Vesper's relationship felt more tragic in the book.
    After its initial crisis (Vesper’s horrified reaction when Bond reveals he was going to propose is heartbreaking in retrospect), the relationship seems to right itself; there is the poignant final night (“Look at me,’ she said, ‘and let me look at you’”) and then the horrible shock the next day, followed by the even greater shock of Bond’s feelings for her disappearing at the end—a shock the movie throws away when Bond learns of Vesper’s perfidy before her death and even threatens to kill her. The film ends with Bond standing victorious over a villain Vesper posthumously helped him catch, whereas the book ends with Bond impotent and defeated and shouting hatred into a phone.
    I suppose even in the late 2000s Fleming’s ending would have been just too dark and downbeat for a mass audience.

    Switching topics, I don't think Roger Moore would have done well in OHMSS. He would have had zero chemistry with Diana Rigg and she would have made him look lightweight and artificial. Lazenby worked decently well alongside of her because Hunt used the old tactic of placing a professional with an amateur, with the latter's spontaneity complementing the former's polish. His natural cockiness and unselfconscious physical assurance clicked with her hauteur and inner fire. Roger would have come off as brittle, coy, and cold next to Rigg, in the same way David Niven (the previous generation's Roger Moore) would have looked stagy alongside an actress of equivalent strength. And looking over Moore's films, it's interesting how often he fails to connect with the lead actresses--not entirely his fault, since most of the actresses in his Bond films aren't particularly good. He has a decent connection with Maud Adams in OP, but she was not an actress anywhere on Rigg's level. If she was, she would have probably blown him off the screen.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 2021 Posts: 16,413
    I totally agree with Python's point about the sinking building ending: I can still remember watching that in the cinema and thinking 'why am I watching him beating people up when the far more gripping plot is what's going to happen between him and Vesper?'. It did feel like the producers bottled it at that point and felt they needed an action set piece because it's Bond, but the film they were making didn't want one.
    Revelator wrote: »

    Switching topics, I don't think Roger Moore would have done well in OHMSS. He would have had zero chemistry with Diana Rigg and she would have made him look lightweight and artificial.

    I'm not sure you can know that. It's not exactly like Pat Macnee was an incredible thespian who was way above Moore's level, and she managed to create an engaging screen partnership pretty well with him without blowing him off the screen.
  • Posts: 1,394
    Telly Savalas is by far the best on screen personification of Blofeld.He’s the only one who comes across as a serious physical threat to Bond.
Sign In or Register to comment.