Controversial opinions about Bond films

1689690692694695707

Comments

  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    edited October 2021 Posts: 7,551
    mtm wrote: »
    Not with Vesper on their side: she just puts their account number in and that’s that.
    But LC and her don’t seem to be working together. Is it her that reveals the tell?

    That's exactly what I'm saying, and why Quantum introduces her into the plot; it's a Plan B in the event that Le Chiffre loses, so that the money doesn't end up with MI6.

    Yes, IMO, it is her that reveals the tell. "It only proves that she's guilty, not that he's [Mathis] innocent."

    Love sussing this stuff out!
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,188
    FYI, it’s SPECTRE not Quantum.

    ;)
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    edited October 2021 Posts: 7,551
    Right... :P

    Maybe we can say Quantum handles Counterintelligence and Extortion, and SMERSH or something handles Terrorism and Revenge? :P
  • slide_99slide_99 USA
    edited October 2021 Posts: 693
    Whether she sent that money to Bond's account, to a Treasury account, or as I had assumed, some other account, is not specified.
    ]

    It is specified. When Bond finds out he's being betrayed at the end, Mendel tells Bond over the phone that the account (the one Vesper is withdrawing the money from) is the one given to them by his company (MI6 or presumably a shell company they own). That's where the funds were transferred to when he told Vesper the password and had her enter it into Mendel's computer.
    Also, as far as I can see, Vesper doesn't need Bond's password, because he would have entered it anyway. And that password exists only to release the funds into a designated account one time. It would not be the password to later access the account itself. Why would it be?

    Not sure what you're asking. Why wouldn't it be the same password? Maybe it's not realistic that MI6 wouldn't change the password for extra security instead of keeping Bond's, but it's not really a plot hole.
    It's so weird that Le Chiffre talks about getting the account number from Vesper (which apparently is a bluff?). So his plan is to go to Mendel, say James couldn't make it, so I, the loser of the match, will enter the password for him. And then he'll enter Vesper's account number and Bond's password thereby...sending the money to Bond's account/Treasury? What?

    Presumably Le Chiffre was going to kill Bond and keep Vesper alive so she could enter the account number and password in Bond's stead, as she was a member of the British Treasury and wasn't under any suspicion.
    Vesper made a deal with Mr White to save Bond's life. Of course, she already had an ongoing working relationship with Mr White, and if Mr White wants the money, he can't kill Bond anyway, so it's not a very novel deal. Vesper does not know Bond's password, but she is able to make this "deal" because she knows she doesn't need his password, and Mr White seems to understand this too, given that he went for the deal. Furthermore, Vesper never makes any effort at all to get Bond's password out of him, because it isn't relevant.

    Mr. White didn't really care about the money. He himself said so just before he killed Le Chiffre. The money was just payment for keeping Bond alive.
    As to the deal itself, again, it's odd. She could have made the exact same deal with Le Chiffre and save Bond even more pain, while still getting Mr White his money ultimately.

    Again, Mr. White was going to kill LeChiffre no matter what. There was no reason for Vesper to cooperate with LeChiffre since he was dead meat anyway. Mr. White was calling the shots.
    It's odd that she and Le Chiffre both fail to understand this. And again, after Mr White doesn't kill Bond, she got her end of the deal, so why deliver the money at all?

    If Vesper doesn't deliver the money, Quantum/Spectre kills Bond.
    Again, hopefully I'm just wrong somehow, but I'm becoming less inclined to think so. You did suggest that Bond revealed the password in his delirium and Vesper passed it along to Mr White, which doesn't really make sense and doesn't seem to have happened.

    I meant that Bond told her the password during the recuperation segment. I just worded it poorly.

  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    edited October 2021 Posts: 7,551
    It’s not an MI6 or shell back account; it’s a Quantum bank account. Read the above posts between mtm and myself.

    The money was never in a treasury/MI6 bank account.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,551
    I think it needs to be understood that Quantum never intended to get the money, they didn’t want the money. In the beginning of the film, Quantum facilitates the transition of money from Obanno to Le Chiffre. Quantum wants him to have the money, because Quantum wants to be a reputable criminal organization that facilitates criminal activity. Quantum only ends up with the money because Le Chiffre fails.
    See above, Plan A, Plan B.
  • slide_99slide_99 USA
    edited October 2021 Posts: 693
    It’s not an MI6 or shell back account; it’s a Quantum bank account. Read the above posts between mtm and myself.

    The money was never in a treasury/MI6 bank account.

    Yeah I forgot about that bit with M calling Bond before he calls Mendel. Actually that does strain credibility, how MI6 let Bond/Vesper transfer the winnings to an unknown account and not one they controlled.
  • Posts: 2,402
    No Time to Die is not just the greatest James Bond film.

    It's damned near being the greatest film ever made; it just breached my top 20.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,551
    “How can I trust this man with my money?”
    “Our organization can only guarantee the introduction.”
    If Le Chiffre was a member of Quantum, Mr. White would not have responded that way.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,584
    No Time to Die is not just the greatest James Bond film.

    It's damned near being the greatest film ever made; it just breached my top 20.
    I can't imagine this film besting CR or FRWL, but it sure is great to see it getting mostly love.
  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    edited October 2021 Posts: 1,711
    I'll forgo quotes for the sake of brevity. :)

    When is an account designated?
    Before the match, Mendel explains, "The money will remain in escrow until I return and the winner of the contest enters his or her password into the encryptor whereupon the entire sum will be wired to any bank account in the world you nominate."

    That's not the past tense. No account has been nominated at that point. We see Bond enter a password, but no account is ever entered or mentioned being entered until Vesper types one in at the clinic. There is no reason to think an account number has been entered before that.

    What is happening when Mendel is at the clinic?
    When Vesper does enter an account number, and Bond enters the password, Bond seems to think the money is going to Treasury. Because he never again talks about sending the money to Treasury and is surprised to learn Treasury doesn't have the money. And the movie seems to expect you to find this immediately sinister. Not to think, "Oh, they just haven't sent the money from their other account to Treasury yet."

    This is why I have the impression that Vesper can enter any account number she wants at that point, and why I think that's exactly what she does (but to Mr White's benefit, obviously not Le Chiffre's or Treasury's).

    What does Bond's password do?@slide_99
    The password releases money to any account in the world that you nominate. It is not the password for your nominated account. Mendel does not have a machine that can change the password on "any bank account in the world" and thereby allow access to it. (If he did, Le Chiffre would be advised to kidnap Mendel and try to get that wonderful machine! :)))

    It seems to be a one-time thing. That password will be re-entered once, into Mendel's encryptor.

    Is there a reason for Vesper to help Le Chiffre?
    Well, the movie suggests she already has helped him with the "tell" thing, so yes. And the movie tells us she wants to save Bond, so making a deal with Le Chiffre seems to make sense. You save Bond from torture, and when your boss comes and kills Le Chiffre, he'll get the money anyway.

    And Le Chiffre could have and should have pressed her do this regardless of what Vesper wanted. No reason to talk to Bond at all. Mr White got the money without ever talking to Bond or getting his password.

    Is there a reason for Vesper to hand over the money at the end?
    Not that I can think of. If Vesper can't trust Quantum/Spectre not to kill her after doing it (and the movie tells us "she knew she was going to her death"), I have no idea why she would trust them not to kill Bond. It seems like the dumbest of several options.

    ---

    At the very least, this is only cut and dry on a superficial emotional level. Almost every aspect of these events has had a variety of explanations. You can't say the same of, say, Zorin's plan to flood Silicon Valley. There are moments that line up with this concept or that, but there's always something contradictory too. It's not well-written.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 2021 Posts: 16,413
    mtm wrote: »
    Well that’s my point; the film as we know it hinges on LC and White acting separately, with LC having (apparently) Mathis on his side, and ultimately White having Vesper on his side. If LC and Vesper had worked together (and they both want to give the money to White ultimately so why not) then LC would have got the money no matter whether he wins or Bond does: Vesper would have just keyed his account number in and that’s that.

    I don't think LC wants to give the money to White. And LC indicating he has Mathis on his side was just fiction, I think it was in there to throw Bond off.

    Agreed on Mathis (it's very unclear in the film and I think a bit messy to leave it unresolved) but I'm not so sure about LC's intentions with the money. He clearly wants to pay back Obanno before he's killed, but even after that he seems to be acting from desperation rather than greed, ready to go to the Americans etc. to save his skin.

    mtm wrote: »
    Not with Vesper on their side: she just puts their account number in and that’s that.
    But LC and her don’t seem to be working together. Is it her that reveals the tell?

    That's exactly what I'm saying, and why Quantum introduces her into the plot; it's a Plan B in the event that Le Chiffre loses, so that the money doesn't end up with MI6.

    Yes, IMO, it is her that reveals the tell. "It only proves that she's guilty, not that he's [Mathis] innocent."

    Love sussing this stuff out!

    But if she does tell LC and they are working together, as pointed out, why would he need to torture Bond at all when she could just enter the account number for him? It only makes sense if they're not working together.
    slide_99 wrote: »
    Again, Mr. White was going to kill LeChiffre no matter what. There was no reason for Vesper to cooperate with LeChiffre since he was dead meat anyway. Mr. White was calling the shots.

    So what's in it for White to let any of this play out at all? Just kill Le Chiffre at the start.
    “How can I trust this man with my money?”
    “Our organization can only guarantee the introduction.”
    If Le Chiffre was a member of Quantum, Mr. White would not have responded that way.

    More reason for White to have just killed him, or at least straight after Obanno is killed. Quantum had Vesper's (supposed) boyfriend so they could manipulate her, but why all the grand planning if all they want is Le Chiffre dead and they're not even bothered about the money?
    The only bonus seems to be that they have, through Vesper, an in to having a hold over a double-O MI6 agent, but they mess that up by him leaving the service anyway. Really Mr White makes a terrible hash of the whole thing.



  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    Posts: 1,711
    Oh gosh, Mathis. I should have put him in my little Q+A. Le Chiffre mentions him to misdirect the audience, not even Bond. And there's at least half a dozen shots designed to do the same. It's a bit cheap.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 2021 Posts: 16,413
    You could say that the only reason White steps in is because he does want the money, and by torturing and possibly killing Bond LC is actually risking them losing it forever (they would have got it if LC won, they would have got it if Bond won as they'd recruited Vesper with the Algerian).


    Oh gosh, Mathis. I should have put him in my little Q+A. Le Chiffre mentions him to misdirect the audience, not even Bond. And there's at least half a dozen shots designed to do the same. It's a bit cheap.

    It was the only thing that annoyed me coming out of the film, they had so clearly fudged that.

  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    edited October 2021 Posts: 1,711
    With apologies, I thought I'd take a stab at an example.

    You're in this poker match. Your personal bank account is with Deutsche Bank. Mendel tells you they can send the winnings to "any bank account in the world you nominate." You decide you will nominate your Deutsche Bank account, obviously, and enter "VESPER" as your password for Mendel's encryptor.

    Does "VESPER" become the password to your Deutsche Bank account? Of course not. It is the password to send your potential winnings to your Deutsche Bank account. If you want to get funds from that account, you'll need whatever passwords/PINs/TANs exist for that account.

    So if, in the movie now, Vesper CAN'T put in any account number she wants when Mendel arrives, then LC is torturing Bond solely for the right to enter an account number and password that will be entered anyway. The money will go to the account designated by Vesper before, and he can't access it. Unless Vesper helps him access it. He should be persuading/torturing Vesper.

    If Vesper CAN put any account number in when Mendel arrives, she can send the money wherever she wants, and LC should be persuading/torturing Vesper.

    Doing anything at all with James Bond is a complete waste of time.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 2021 Posts: 16,413
    Yes that's right to an extent, but how are you saying he can make Vesper put his account number in? He has no leverage on her: he can't really tell her that Bond's life will be at stake if she doesn't because Bond is the one who has to enter the password and this plan hinges on him entering the password when he suspects nothing is wrong.
    White is the one who has leverage on Vesper (using the Algerian), not LC - and White and LC aren't working together. So the only course of action available to LC is to force Bond to give him the password, and then most probably take Mendel's machine by force - which shouldn't be too hard.

    Torturing Vesper a few weeks before she has to put the code in and then letting her go is hardly going to make her do it! :))
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    15 years later , the debate still rages.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,584
    DAD is underrated.
  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    Posts: 1,711
    mtm wrote: »
    Yes that's right to an extent, but how are you saying he can make Vesper put his account number in? He has no leverage on her: he can't really tell her that Bond's life will be at stake if she doesn't because Bond is the one who has to enter the password and this plan hinges on him entering the password when he suspects nothing is wrong.
    White is the one who has leverage on Vesper (using the Algerian), not LC - and White and LC aren't working together. So the only course of action available to LC is to force Bond to give him the password, and then most probably take Mendel's machine by force - which shouldn't be too hard.

    Torturing Vesper a few weeks before she has to put the code in and then letting her go is hardly going to make her do it! :))

    First of all, none of this changes the uselessness of LC learning Bond's password. Second, he has no more leverage over Bond than he does over Vesper. Third, torturing Bond for a password a few weeks (?) before it needs to be entered is hardly going to be sure its accurate when you enter it (after finding Mendel and stealing his machine).

    It just doesn't make sense.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 2021 Posts: 16,413
    mtm wrote: »
    Yes that's right to an extent, but how are you saying he can make Vesper put his account number in? He has no leverage on her: he can't really tell her that Bond's life will be at stake if she doesn't because Bond is the one who has to enter the password and this plan hinges on him entering the password when he suspects nothing is wrong.
    White is the one who has leverage on Vesper (using the Algerian), not LC - and White and LC aren't working together. So the only course of action available to LC is to force Bond to give him the password, and then most probably take Mendel's machine by force - which shouldn't be too hard.

    Torturing Vesper a few weeks before she has to put the code in and then letting her go is hardly going to make her do it! :))

    First of all, none of this changes the uselessness of LC learning Bond's password.

    No it doesn't. If he has the password and grabs the machine, he has the money. This is simple.
    Second, he has no more leverage over Bond than he does over Vesper.

    Well he has Vesper, whose safety he threatens right there and then; and he has the threat of torture. That's what torture is generally for! :))
    It's not the greatest plan, but he's desperate. But those are quite clearly two points of leverage.

    Torturing Vesper in order to make her do something at an indeterminate future date as you suggest really doesn't make any sense.
    Third, torturing Bond for a password a few weeks (?) before it needs to be entered is hardly going to be sure its accurate when you enter it (after finding Mendel and stealing his machine).

    Why would it be a few weeks? He could keep Bond alive and go and get it the next day. Or he could torture it out of Bond and then kill him, but warn him that if it's incorrect he'll kill Vesper later.

    You didn't answer my question about how exactly he would persuade Vesper to enter a different account number? You keep saying that would be a better plan but you don't explain how he could possibly actually make her do that when she's alone later with Bond..?



    Slide_99 also raises an interesting point about how Mendel talks about an account which Bond's 'company' gave him, possibly suggesting he had the details before Bond arrived at the poker table. It certainly seems an odd way to talk about Vesper.
  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    edited October 2021 Posts: 1,711
    "Few weeks" was repeated from your scenario. And I was implying that LC has equal leverage over Bond and Vesper: torture, death, etc. You're only repeating my point...

    Torturing Bond, getting his password, robbing a Swiss bank of an encryptor, and then hoping the password was correct is "simple" only insofar as "simple" can be a synonym for "stupid."

    How do you make Vesper enter a different password? Threaten to kill her/Bond if she does anything funny? How did he get her to cooperate on the "tell" thing? I don't know if you're being serious or if this is a weird intellectual exercise, but it's easier to imagine a way of doing that than it is to imagine taking an encryptor from a Swiss bank by force. And hoping Vesper enters your account number (or else) is not dumber than hoping Bond's password is correct. It also has the advantage of not having to rob a Swiss bank.

    The plot elements offered by CR just don't allow for a logical scenario with any of this.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 2021 Posts: 16,413
    "Few weeks" was repeated from your scenario.

    No, that one was for Vesper going off and doing it under Bond's nose without him suspecting, hence it will take as long as it takes; if LC takes the password by force there's no reason to hang around.

    And I was implying that LC has equal leverage over Bond and Vesper: torture, death, etc. You're only repeating my point...

    No.. you can't torture someone to do something for you at a future indeterminate date (i.e. Vesper inputting the account later). You can torture them to give you information right there and then (Bond's password). Two different things.
    Vesper can be threatened to get the password because he has her right there and then; Bond cannot be threatened to change the account number because he needs to be free and not suspicious to enter it. Again, two different situations.
    Torturing Bond, getting his password, robbing a Swiss bank of an encryptor, and then hoping the password was correct is "simple" only insofar as "simple" can be a synonym for "stupid."

    Irrelevant. LC is desperate and out of options.
    How do you make Vesper enter a different password? Threaten to kill her/Bond if she does anything funny?

    After you've released her into Bond and MI6's protection? Not a very solid plan.
    How did he get her to cooperate on the "tell" thing? I don't know if you're being serious or if this is a weird intellectual exercise,

    Why say this?
    Rhetorical question, there's no need to get into personal stuff as per usual.
    but it's easier to imagine a way of doing that than it is to imagine taking an encryptor from a Swiss bank by force.

    Not really. Mendel doesn't appear to have any protection as he wanders around and LC manages to capture a Double-O agent, so it's easier to imagine him stealing a briefcase from a wimpy guy than it is exerting some sort of mind control on a woman.

    And hoping Vesper enters your account number (or else) is not dumber than hoping Bond's password is correct. It also has the advantage of not having to rob a Swiss bank.

    It really is, especially if it involves her going and simply telling Bond and the entire weight of MI6 about the plan. Even if somehow he does manage to get to Vesper to exert revenge he still has no cash- and bear in mind that the US/UK plan is that LC is left with no choice but to actually defect to them in order to get protection from White, and we know that LC sees that as very much being his backup plan because he says as much. How's he supposed to take revenge on her when he's in protective custody? It wouldn't work as a plan. Also his desperation suggests that he's out of time.
    Stealing a briefcase/getting Mendel to let him just access the briefcase is much less dumb than that.

    The plot elements offered by CR just don't allow for a logical scenario with any of this.

    Agreed, none of it hangs together very well, but some parts do. Torturing the password out of Bond is the only thing he can do at that point, and it would work.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,188
    Man, you guys are still going on about it?
  • cwl007cwl007 England
    Posts: 611
    So when exactly does Vesper decide to betray Bond?
    Is it always on the cards (no pun) from the train meet? Or at some point later in the story?
    An interesting detail I only really spotted on my most recent CR viewing is Vesper's reaction immediately after typing the password in at the hospital. If you don't know what's coming next it is throwaway but knowing about the betrayal beforehand as a viewer it can be read as guilt or regret. It's a very nice moment.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,188
    cwl007 wrote: »
    So when exactly does Vesper decide to betray Bond?
    Is it always on the cards (no pun) from the train meet? Or at some point later in the story?
    An interesting detail I only really spotted on my most recent CR viewing is Vesper's reaction immediately after typing the password in at the hospital. If you don't know what's coming next it is throwaway but knowing about the betrayal beforehand as a viewer it can be read as guilt or regret. It's a very nice moment.

    She had been working for SPECTRE presumably for years at that point. We later see in Mr. White’s secret room that there was an interrogation VHS with her name on the label. That tracks well with the novel, where she had been working for SMERSH for years.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,584
    Man, you guys are still going on about it?
    "This might take some time."
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,217
    cwl007 wrote: »
    So when exactly does Vesper decide to betray Bond?
    Is it always on the cards (no pun) from the train meet? Or at some point later in the story?
    An interesting detail I only really spotted on my most recent CR viewing is Vesper's reaction immediately after typing the password in at the hospital. If you don't know what's coming next it is throwaway but knowing about the betrayal beforehand as a viewer it can be read as guilt or regret. It's a very nice moment.

    She had been working for SPECTRE presumably for years at that point. We later see in Mr. White’s secret room that there was an interrogation VHS with her name on the label. That tracks well with the novel, where she had been working for SMERSH for years.

    I wonder then what the timeline for the kidnapping of her "boyfriend" was then in relation to the events of CR.
  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    edited October 2021 Posts: 1,711
    Man, you guys are still going on about it?

    :)) I'm fascinated by how little sense the plot makes, and I'm easily baited when my comments are broken up into a bunch of little quotes interspersed with inane responses.
    mtm wrote: »
    i
    After you've released her into Bond and MI6's protection? Not a very solid plan.

    How does Mr White get her to hand over a bunch of money to his side when she has been released into Bond's and MI6's protection (and is over her boyfriend)?

    Look, maybe I'm underestimating how difficult it is to get Vesper, who helped out with the "tell" thing and seemingly was in on a deception to get Bond to go after her, to cooperate with you and enter your account number, when it in no way goes against her apparent interests to do so. Maybe that'd be hard for some reason. :-?? I don't think anything sensible can be made out of what's in the movie, and they should have thought more carefully about what they added to Fleming's story.

    I admit, your idea can work, if Mendel just walks around with that encryptor all the time, without security, and not just when he's en route to the winner of the poker match. LC can overpower him, enter his own account number (assuming slide_99 is wrong about whether that's possible), and hope Bond's password was real, and if it isn't, they have time to torture out another one before the encryptor is deactivated or recovered or whatever. I mean, if that's what you think they're going for, super.

    I wish I could just get an overview of what LC and the others thought they were doing. Slide_99's explanation seems to require "VESPER" to be the password for the bank account, which is crazy. Yours seems to require obtaining a Swiss bank's encryptor to be "simple". The first idea seems impossible, and the second adds ideas not even suggested by the film, and strike me as more implausible as getting an already cooperative person to act in her own interests. But that is obviously subjective.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,188
    cwl007 wrote: »
    So when exactly does Vesper decide to betray Bond?
    Is it always on the cards (no pun) from the train meet? Or at some point later in the story?
    An interesting detail I only really spotted on my most recent CR viewing is Vesper's reaction immediately after typing the password in at the hospital. If you don't know what's coming next it is throwaway but knowing about the betrayal beforehand as a viewer it can be read as guilt or regret. It's a very nice moment.

    She had been working for SPECTRE presumably for years at that point. We later see in Mr. White’s secret room that there was an interrogation VHS with her name on the label. That tracks well with the novel, where she had been working for SMERSH for years.

    I wonder then what the timeline for the kidnapping of her "boyfriend" was then in relation to the events of CR.

    Might have been a year or two, it’s vague enough to say anything. In the novel I think it’s implied that her boyfriend was kidnapped during WWII, which means in the book she had been working for SMERSH for at least 7 years. I could be wrong.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,551
    cwl007 wrote: »
    So when exactly does Vesper decide to betray Bond?
    Is it always on the cards (no pun) from the train meet? Or at some point later in the story?
    An interesting detail I only really spotted on my most recent CR viewing is Vesper's reaction immediately after typing the password in at the hospital. If you don't know what's coming next it is throwaway but knowing about the betrayal beforehand as a viewer it can be read as guilt or regret. It's a very nice moment.

    She had been working for SPECTRE presumably for years at that point. We later see in Mr. White’s secret room that there was an interrogation VHS with her name on the label. That tracks well with the novel, where she had been working for SMERSH for years.

    No, it’s her boyfriend who is the Spectre/Quantum agent. He seduces important women, they stage a kidnapping, Quantum says “we have your boyfriend and we’ll kill him unless you do as we say.” There’s every reason to think she actually works for the Treasury like she says. She implicated in the plot by Quantum through her boyfriend. This part at least was made very clear in the film and in the end of Quantum.
Sign In or Register to comment.