Total Recall (2012)

2

Comments

  • Posts: 1,143
    Total Recall is a classic, why remake it? Simple answer is that it makes money the same way Goldeneye video game remake also made money. It's all about cashing in on a name. I'll watch the new Total Recall to see what it's like but it would have to be amazing to beat the original.

    What are the chances other sci-fi classics like Alien and Bladerunner being next? I hope not.
  • Posts: 11,213
    The original is on ITV2 now :D
  • Posts: 1,143
    BAIN123 wrote:
    The original is on ITV2 now :D

    Good call, it's just started on ITV2 +1. Time to get the popcorn out!
  • Posts: 5,634
    Total Recall should not be re-made - End Of Story

    You can't replace or try to better the guys who put together the original - Schwarzenegger, Stone, Ticotin, Cox, Ironside etc - real actors and actresses of caliber who did a fine job, and let's not forget the director himself Verhoeven, who did a fine job before that with Robocop. Just leave this movie release alone - don't try to copy it, remake it, or go one better. It's a stand alone release and one of the best movies ever made, just leave it at that :-<
  • QsAssistantQsAssistant All those moments lost in time... like tears in rain
    Posts: 1,812
    Total Recall should not be re-made - End Of Story

    You can't replace or try to better the guys who put together the original - Schwarzenegger, Stone, Ticotin, Cox, Ironside etc - real actors and actresses of caliber who did a fine job, and let's not forget the director himself Verhoeven, who did a fine job before that with Robocop. Just leave this movie release alone - don't try to copy it, remake it, or go one better. It's a stand alone release and one of the best movies ever made, just leave it at that :-<

    Just letting you know that a remake of Robocop is in the works, with Joel Kinnaman in lead role and Hugh Laurie as the lead villian.

  • Posts: 5,634
    No damn surprise is it, although a remake was essentially done in 1990 with Robocop 2 - and that was awful, I can't emphasize how bad it was, but if they want to do more remakes, then what can you do :-<
  • edited June 2012 Posts: 5,767
    boldfinger wrote:
    Arnie is so overrated.

    BLASPHEMY!!!
    I shall be the sledge hammer that striketh down upon and smasheth these heathen idols! :ar!

    Talking about Sledge Hammer, anybody else enjoyed to see David Rasche in MiB3?
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,367
    boldfinger wrote:
    Arnie is so overrated.

    Allow me to break the Ice....my name is Freeze! =))
  • edited June 2012 Posts: 11,213
    Murdock wrote:
    boldfinger wrote:
    Arnie is so overrated.

    Allow me to break the Ice....my name is Freeze! =))

    :-& :-&

    Arnold's finest hour (incidently one of my favourite films) B-) B-) B-)

  • Posts: 7,653
    Total Recall should not be re-made - End Of Story

    You can't replace or try to better the guys who put together the original - Schwarzenegger, Stone, Ticotin, Cox, Ironside etc - real actors and actresses of caliber who did a fine job, and let's not forget the director himself Verhoeven, who did a fine job before that with Robocop. Just leave this movie release alone - don't try to copy it, remake it, or go one better. It's a stand alone release and one of the best movies ever made, just leave it at that :-<

    Just letting you know that a remake of Robocop is in the works, with Joel Kinnaman in lead role and Hugh Laurie as the lead villian.

    And there is talk of another remake of Starship Troupers, albeit a more faithfull adaptation as Verhoeven did.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,489
    Terminator 2 yes; most of Arnie's other films, for me, no. Just flat and uninteresting.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited July 2012 Posts: 24,380
    Already have a thread on the subject. Come on folks, don't be lazy. It was hardly one page down in this section! Another bit of forum space wasted.

    http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/2815/total-recall-remake#Item_16
  • Posts: 2,599
    Saw the remake of Total Recall last night and I must say I enjoyed it. Better than I expected but I found myself a little bored in the last half an hour, my attention drifting due to the excessive action. I can remember enjoying the original too but I'd need to watch it again to decide whether I think it's better than the new version.

    Whose seen the new version? Anyone notice that Farell was reading Fleming's 'The Spy Who Loved Me' as he commuted to the United Federation of Britain near the beginning of the film. Loved this! :) I immediately recognised the book what with the excellent cover design by Richie Fahey. Incidentally the Fahey covers are the only contemporary Bond books that are well designed. I love the whole set.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    How was this film? I am curious as to what everyone thought.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,784
    As a huge fan of the 1990 film, I can't see myself liking this new one more. I watched the trailer at the cinemas, and from what I saw, the dialogue is too similar to the former. Of course I shouldn't judge it before I've actually seen it- but at the moment I'm not expecting it to be as great as anticipated. However, I do like the notion of it
    not being set on Mars.
    Guess I'll wait and see how it turns out.
  • edited August 2012 Posts: 5,767
    I found it very much ok, not the epitome of originality, but enjoyable for sure.

    I agree with @Bounine that the last half hour is a bit hard to follow, but it doesn´t matter too much, the story in this film stands clearly back behind the action and the fantastic settings.

    I don´t love Kate Beckinsale as much as Jessica Biel, who is really loveable in this one, but the former is no less than gorgeous at kicking Colin Farrell´s ass.

    That the cityscapes are so magnificent is both an asset and a problem, because it´s difficult to simultaneously take in the cityscapes and the massive action. A bit more establishing of the mood wouldn´t have hurt, but then we´re dealing with a Len Wiseman film, so let´s not be too demanding. Perhaps I should just watch the film again ;-).

    I wouldn´t say that the 1990 film is better (mind you I´m no Ahnuld worshipper), but in the first half hour of this remake everything seems somehow familiar, bringing to mind many other films, from the 1990 film to Blade Runner to Star Wars.

    It´s an expensive B-movie, and as such it works nicely.


    And, yeah, owning almost all of the Fahey-artwork paperbacks, of course I instantly noticed the book. I just wasn´t sure which one it was, TSHLM or FYEO. I think it was the latter, @Bounine. :-B
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,247
    I used my press pass to get into the Premiere Screening in Dublin, and I must say I found it rather enjoyable. I find it hard to call it a remake as there is an entirely new setup with only a handful of nods to the original. Farrell really elevates the film too I think, he hasn't got the physical presence that Arnie has (for obvious reasons), but the guy has some very good acting skill. Biel was underused, Beckinsale was overused (not that I'm complaining) and I was disappointed with the lack of screentime Bryan Cranston had - him being the villain was a major draw for me but he wasn't used very well.

    I liked the whole look of the film, and the action scenes were very good, especially the elevator chase. Wiseman, to his credit, knows how to construct an action scene.

    Going into it with a relaxed mind with lowered expectations helps the film a lot, as it is essentially a B-grade science fiction flick with heavy reliance on action.

    P.S. I thought it was FYEO that was featured, but then again I only caught a quick glimpse.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,380
    I believe it was TSWLM.

    I like the film for its visuals but the story left me somewhat underwhelmed. I don't think the story is a particular step-up from the Verhoeven film.
  • Posts: 5,767
    DarthDimi wrote:
    I believe it was TSWLM.
    I believe it had Fleming´s name in yellow and not pink on it, so it must be FYEO.
    DarthDimi wrote:
    I don't think the story is a particular step-up from the Verhoeven film.
    That should be expectable when Wiseman remakes Verhoeven ;-).
  • edited August 2012 Posts: 2,599
    "Going into it with a relaxed mind with lowered expectations helps the film a lot, as it is essentially a B-grade science fiction flick with heavy reliance on action."

    Yeah, that helped me too. I should probably do this with Skyfall too.

    As for the Bond book, I saw Fleming's name and before that recognised it as a Fahey cover design Bond book but wasn't certain of which book it was. I looked it up on the internet and read two different reviews of Total Recall that said Farell reads TSWLM. I guess they could be wrong but that's why I said it was TSWLM in my previous post.
  • Posts: 5,634
    I haven't seen this latest movie release, although may go along as I did enjoy the Verhoeven original from 1990, but whatever they have put together, I feel it won't be as good a watch as the original one, they should never have re-attempted another release of this movie I truly feel
  • Posts: 5,767
    boldfinger wrote:
    DarthDimi wrote:
    I believe it was TSWLM.
    I believe it had Fleming´s name in yellow and not pink on it, so it must be FYEO.
    I was wrong. It was TSHLM.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,380
    boldfinger wrote:
    boldfinger wrote:
    DarthDimi wrote:
    I believe it was TSWLM.
    I believe it had Fleming´s name in yellow and not pink on it, so it must be FYEO.
    I was wrong. It was TSHLM.

    Don't tell me you went for a second viewing to make sure. ;-)

  • edited August 2012 Posts: 12,837
    Well I saw it today, and even though it wasn't bad, it doesn't top the original and there was no need for it to be made.

    5/10 because the original exists.
  • edited August 2012 Posts: 5,767
    DarthDimi wrote:
    Don't tell me you went for a second viewing to make sure. ;-)
    I hoped noone would notice :\"> .
    No, it didn´t get that bad, but it became a guilty pleasure, and believe it or not, I enjoyed it even better the second time. Perhaps I was too much thinking about some other things the first time around, or it was because I knew what to expect this time and could concentrate on enjoying the enjoyable elements. For instance the self-ironic joke right at the very beginning, when the company logo of Original Films is shown ;-).

  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    I had a good time watching this. Very enjoyable scifi and Bekinsale and Biel are hot. The hand to hand combat was pretty good and what made the experience better was seeing the new SF trailer.
  • QsAssistantQsAssistant All those moments lost in time... like tears in rain
    Posts: 1,812
    Honestly... I liked it better than the original *ducks for cover*
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,247
    @QsAssistant, I never really liked the original that much in the first place, and although I haven't seen it in a while, I would place the new version above it too.
  • edited August 2012 Posts: 12,837
    Honestly... I liked it better than the original *ducks for cover*

    *empties mag as QsAssistant ducks, but misses*

    Fine, hide in cover. But you have to come out some time, and until then, I'll be waiting. >:)
  • Posts: 2,599
    doubleoego wrote:
    I had a good time watching this. Very enjoyable scifi and Bekinsale and Biel are hot. The hand to hand combat was pretty good and what made the experience better was seeing the new SF trailer.

    Becks doesn't really do it for me but I must say that I do have a bit of a crush on Biel.

Sign In or Register to comment.