It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Belligerent?, Annoying?, Confusing?, Rude?, Bizarre? etc, not sure what areas it covers
Furthermore something like this was brought to the fore last year and Admin said 'It may not be a good idea' as it can only get out of hand or 'people may take it the wrong way and problems could arise and tempers flare' etc, I'm sure I remember something said at the time
I.e. say 007RogerMoore is all that you say, Mr 007RogerMoore sees this, takes umbrage and events could spiral out of control and before you know it, it could well become a closed thread in the end
It's all very well giving out honors and recognition but a different game when we discuss the negative aspects of any participants and the responses from those involved that maybe could get out of hand eventually
I hope you understand what I'm getting at, I just thought it may be relevant
I'd maybe nominate myself for this and it has nothing to do with the above, I just feel I can be disagreeable at times, not so much controversial, but there is usually a difference of opinion more often than not, but after all, that's what these forums are here for, it will never change no matter where you go on things like these
And bring back the lasers! ;)
What happened to shadow? I used to enjoy reading the arguments he had with everyone, hahaha.
Anyway, I nominate @007RogerMoore too.
Nope, that has nothing to do with his Dutchness.. I once PM'd him in Dutch and he's just the same, including his....creative way of using the language. M_Balje indeed gets my vote.
There are others though who at least were controversial:
Charles_Vine
Erica Ambler (who got hit on by so many newbees as they thought he actually was a woman)
You only live Thrice
And one bloke who came back under so many different names it was quite hard to keep track off.
You think I hate Craig as Bond ? Charles_Vine hates him 10 times worse.
Well I know you like him outside of Bond, but did @Charles_Vine just hate him all around?
You were thinking of Scashy no doubt. Never saw a bigger Moore fan than him on this board. If his name comes up for nomination, there's my vote.
Thrice was pretty controversial too.
Vine's posts were so stupid that I skipped over them.
He hates him as Bond. And he was very vocal that CR would be flop at the box office... then he held the same theory for QOS that it would flop...... after QOS, he said in last resort that in 15 years, people would finally see that Craig's tenure was horrible, appalling, abysmal.........
Please. I do not. I have my beliefs, but they are honest. I have explained my position over and over.
I have prefer more of a literary Bond movie tied into the story and scripting aspects of the Bond genre rather than making the Bond movie whatever the current trend is in movie making.
He's got nothing on @Matt_Helm when it comes to troublemaking. Weren't these already decided last year? Hmmmm. It seems time for the 2nd annual awards to commence. Maybe I'll even win one this time around :)
I was going to mention Helm but I figured him to be far more annoying than controversial ;-)
Exactly :D I respect @Perdogg even if I don't agree with him often, I can't say the same thing about the other fella. But I my vote goes to the genious @M_Balje.
@Willy and @Sandy- I rest my case :))