The James Bond Questions Thread

1910121415210

Comments

  • In FRWL, why at the end does Tatiana barge through the door and knock the gun out of Rosa Klebb's hand and then hesitate who to shoot out of her and Bond? Surely she had already made her choice?
  • Posts: 7,653
    In FRWL, why at the end does Tatiana barge through the door and knock the gun out of Rosa Klebb's hand and then hesitate who to shoot out of her and Bond? Surely she had already made her choice?

    Purely a dramatic choice. O:-)

  • At the risk of causing repetition problems what do people think to be the better/higher quality/enjoyable trio of films:

    A View To A Kill, The Living Daylights and Licence to Kill

    or

    Die Another Day, Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace?

    Both follow similar patterns in terms of the tone and critical/audience reception, just interesting to see which one people prefer
  • edited October 2012 Posts: 553
    I would have to take the later trio, as if I match each film against its counterpart ( AVTAK vs DAD, TLD vs CR, QoS vs LTK) LTK would be my only choice from the first three. Plus CR is right at the top for me and AVTAK right at the bottom (not that DAD is any good)
  • I would have to take the later trio, as if I match each film against its counterpart ( AVTAK vs DAD, TLD vs CR, QoS vs LTK) LTK would be my only choice from the first three. Plus CR is right at the top for me and AVTAK right at the bottom (not that DAD is any good)

    It was just an interesting thought, what with AVTAK and DAD being seen (generally anyway) as poor weak films, TLD and CR being seen (generally anyway) as great films that redefined the Bond scene and LTK and QOS which have mixed views and are quite controversial.
  • Posts: 4,762
    I would have to take the later trio, as if I match each film against its counterpart ( AVTAK vs DAD, TLD vs CR, QoS vs LTK) LTK would be my only choice from the first three. Plus CR is right at the top for me and AVTAK right at the bottom (not that DAD is any good)

    It was just an interesting thought, what with AVTAK and DAD being seen (generally anyway) as poor weak films, TLD and CR being seen (generally anyway) as great films that redefined the Bond scene and LTK and QOS which have mixed views and are quite controversial.

    You know, that's a terrific point @Signed_By_RogerMoore! Never have considered that before! Nice going!

    A View to a Kill vs. Die Another Day

    The Living Daylights vs. Casino Royale

    License to Kill vs. Quantum of Solace

    I could see myself going either way with TLD and CR, but the other two match-ups are easily decided!
  • My girlfriend and I just finished watching Licence to Kill (bless her, she loves Dalton as much as I do) and she noticed something. It started when we were laughing at the hideous fish sculpture that was right in Bond's face when he woke up at Sanchez' mansion.
    Then with the 'winking fish' at the very end it dawned on us: was the city having a 'he's dead' party at Sanchez' mansion??? :O That is as morbid as it is awesome!!!

    I seriously think that's what they were doing!

    <center>As a matter of fact, I think that warrants a brand new 'Dalton' meme!!

    DaltonMeme.jpg</center>
  • 00Beast wrote:
    I would have to take the later trio, as if I match each film against its counterpart ( AVTAK vs DAD, TLD vs CR, QoS vs LTK) LTK would be my only choice from the first three. Plus CR is right at the top for me and AVTAK right at the bottom (not that DAD is any good)

    It was just an interesting thought, what with AVTAK and DAD being seen (generally anyway) as poor weak films, TLD and CR being seen (generally anyway) as great films that redefined the Bond scene and LTK and QOS which have mixed views and are quite controversial.

    You know, that's a terrific point @Signed_By_RogerMoore! Never have considered that before! Nice going!

    A View to a Kill vs. Die Another Day

    The Living Daylights vs. Casino Royale

    License to Kill vs. Quantum of Solace

    I could see myself going either way with TLD and CR, but the other two match-ups are easily decided!

    For me, it's a landslide in favour of AVTAK-TLD-LTK. By our logic, that means SF will be like GE, which wouldnt be a bad thing ;)
  • My girlfriend and I just finished watching Licence to Kill (bless her, she loves Dalton as much as I do) and she noticed something. It started when we were laughing at the hideous fish sculpture that was right in Bond's face when he woke up at Sanchez' mansion.
    Then with the 'winking fish' at the very end it dawned on us: was the city having a 'he's dead' party at Sanchez' mansion??? :O That is as morbid as it is awesome!!!

    I seriously think that's what they were doing!

    <center>As a matter of fact, I think that warrants a brand new 'Dalton' meme!!

    DaltonMeme.jpg</center>

    Haha snap! Just finished it too...simply brilliant. I always thought it was that, which is a bit crude. The Presidents corrupt and yet Bond endorses him. I think a more poignant scene at Della's grave/funeral with Bond and Pam walking off together would have been more fitting
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    My girlfriend and I just finished watching Licence to Kill (bless her, she loves Dalton as much as I do) and she noticed something. It started when we were laughing at the hideous fish sculpture that was right in Bond's face when he woke up at Sanchez' mansion.
    Then with the 'winking fish' at the very end it dawned on us: was the city having a 'he's dead' party at Sanchez' mansion??? :O That is as morbid as it is awesome!!!

    I seriously think that's what they were doing!

    <center>As a matter of fact, I think that warrants a brand new 'Dalton' meme!!

    DaltonMeme.jpg</center>
    The party is held at Sanchez's residence! I just checked on Wikipedia. Bond is a badass!!! He got Sanchez good. Took his woman, infiltrated his group and tore it apart from the inside, kills him, and then parties at his former house while he is 6 feet under! THAT'S MY BOY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,176
    Sorry to be a killjoy peeps, but this is turning into a comparison thread. Please find an appropriate thread to compare Bond films in, and keep this for questions you have un-answered about Bond films.
    Thanks.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,362
    Here's a question. Why is the James Bond Theme being heard less and less in recent films? Seriously, it was hardly heard in Casino Royale, Practically non existent in Quantum of Solace. WHERE IS IT GOING? O_o
  • Different Generation of James Bond...

    Different era, different times, change, change and more change is what it is Mr Murdock

    Maybe they'll bring it back for this years 50th anniversary release, but nobody hold their breath..
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,362
    Well after watching this spoilerific video, my worries have lessened.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    This snippet here says that Roger Moore was Ian Fleming's favorite Bond. I have a hard time believing this, as the Moore era chopped his character to pieces. It can't even be true, since Fleming died years before Moore even had one Bond film. JamesBond.jpg
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    edited October 2012 Posts: 2,635
    This snippet here says that Roger Moore was Ian Fleming's favorite Bond. I have a hard time believing this, as the Moore era chopped his character to pieces. It can't even be true, since Fleming died years before Moore even had one Bond film.

    Maybe you had interpreted it wrong. Maybe the STYLE of the Bond of the Books which Films were with RM as Bond was Ian's favourite, more than the Bond of the other ones.
  • From watching the films, and your own impression, what Bond girl do you think 007 has been most attracted too?

    I would say Tatiana from FRWL imo
  • Posts: 4,762
    From watching the films, and your own impression, what Bond girl do you think 007 has been most attracted too?

    I would say Tatiana from FRWL imo

    Definitely, I mean there's the whole "give a wolf a taste" line from Kerim, and boy was he ever right!
  • I just watched TB last night. My least watched Connery film as its the only one I never owned a copy of until a bought the blurays.

    When Domino is telling Bond the story about her brother making her cry she stops and apologizes to Bond for "embarrassing" him. What did she mean by this? How would that embarrass Bond? There's quite a bit of Domino's dialogue that didn't make sense to me.

    Anybody?
  • Some people when they cry and get emotional, they apologise for it, not just for themselves but in case it's making the other person feel bad/awkward.

    Also, if she's flirting with Bond and saying how great and fun her brother is, it may seem like no man can top him?

    My two suggestions :)
  • I haven't seen Thunderball since dinosaurs, don't even own a copy, but didn't Derval cry over having a splinter or something in her foot, and Connery had to suck it out ?

    Been a long time in my defense, but another question that could be asked, was - 'Why did Connery have to participate in a bit of Roger Moore-esque nonsense in the pre credits sequence when it was only two years after his superlative performance in From Russia With Love and probably the most straight faced and serious Bond performance you will ever see, and that includes anything Craig has done'

    It was all a bit too much humor, too soon. This was evident in Goldfinger too
  • I haven't seen Thunderball since dinosaurs, don't even own a copy, but didn't Derval cry over having a splinter or something in her foot, and Connery had to suck it out ?

    Been a long time in my defense, but another question that could be asked, was - 'Why did Connery have to participate in a bit of Roger Moore-esque nonsense in the pre credits sequence when it was only two years after his superlative performance in From Russia With Love and probably the most straight faced and serious Bond performance you will ever see, and that includes anything Craig has done'

    It was all a bit too much humor, too soon. This was evident in Goldfinger too

    For all the talk people say about FRWL being the best Bond film, why is it until recently the producers were desperate to make the next GF or TB? It was clear that that was what they were going for (not in EVERY film admittedly but most of them). I don't get how Connery changed from FRWL to GF to TB, it's unbelievable to think that there was such a short space of time between each of these films.

    With regards to TB, the jet had to be seen as the new DB5, the new gadget. It was unneeded and you are right, is a bit silly (how did it get up there?).
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,362
    What was the MI-6 building featured in Dr. No through Licence to Kill before the change to the one in the Brosnan/Craig films?
  • Murdock wrote:
    What was the MI-6 building featured in Dr. No through Licence to Kill before the change to the one in the Brosnan/Craig films?

    It was just a standard government office building in Whitehall, London where all the British government departments are based.

    I think

    Here's a question:

    What if Sean Connery had made all the Bond films from Dr No to Licence To Kill? Would it have worked? People have said that they preferred Connery's physique in NSNA than DAF so who knows?
  • ^An interesting theory-- taking into account how he looked in 1989,

    indiana_jones_last_crusade_ford_and_connery.jpg

    I wonder just how 'Bondy' he could be made to look--- granted not that far different from NSNA but still.
    If that happened though, Connery would be to Bond like Peter Faulk was to Columbo and Harrison Ford to Indiana Jones-- it would be his character
  • ^An interesting theory-- taking into account how he looked in 1989,

    indiana_jones_last_crusade_ford_and_connery.jpg

    I wonder just how 'Bondy' he could be made to look--- granted not that far different from NSNA but still.
    If that happened though, Connery would be to Bond like Peter Faulk was to Columbo and Harrison Ford to Indiana Jones-- it would be his character

    Agree completely...I think the series would have stopped until maybe 2006 when they "rebooted" it. He would have been similar in LTK that Moore was in AVTAK
  • edited October 2012 Posts: 4,813
    As much as I love Dalton- I can't help but wonder what it would have been like if Moore had stayed until Licence to Kill-- and that movie was done as if it was 'the last one'. Then Dalton or Pierce could still come in for the 90's
    At the very least, it would have been cool to see Moore work with his original Felix again and to try some new daring things (for his Bond)

    007nl_04.jpg

    ^Not my work
  • I haven't seen Thunderball since dinosaurs, don't even own a copy, but didn't Derval cry over having a splinter or something in her foot, and Connery had to suck it out ?

    Been a long time in my defense, but another question that could be asked, was - 'Why did Connery have to participate in a bit of Roger Moore-esque nonsense in the pre credits sequence when it was only two years after his superlative performance in From Russia With Love and probably the most straight faced and serious Bond performance you will ever see, and that includes anything Craig has done'

    It was all a bit too much humor, too soon. This was evident in Goldfinger too

    For all the talk people say about FRWL being the best Bond film, why is it until recently the producers were desperate to make the next GF or TB? It was clear that that was what they were going for (not in EVERY film admittedly but most of them). I don't get how Connery changed from FRWL to GF to TB, it's unbelievable to think that there was such a short space of time between each of these films.

    With regards to TB, the jet had to be seen as the new DB5, the new gadget. It was unneeded and you are right, is a bit silly (how did it get up there?).

    I always think its odd when people say FRWL is the best Bond film because compared to most it's a very different sort of movie. While FRWL is no doubt a great movie and I would place it among the greatest of the Bonds, it really is more of a spy movie than a Bond movie. That is to say that while films like ND, GF and TB are Bond movies which have the signature larger-than-life villains with over-the-top schemes, FRWL is just a rather ordinary spy movie which happens to star James Bond. The mission of going to Turkey to steal a Lector-decoder with the help of a defecting Russian agent sounds more like the dull plot of a novel by Le Carre than it does an exciting Bond movie, but then again when you inject the character of James Bond into the story, it quickly becomes more much more interesting.

    As for the expansion of silliness from one movie to the next, I think it's important to remember the immense celebrity which Connery's movies generated in such a short amount of time. In the 60's Bond became a household name overnight and the films were the epitome of cool so they began to have to out-do themselves while still delivering Bond films, so naturally the movies began to include a bit of self parody as they tried to make things bigger and better.

    And as for the jet and how it got up there, I though the same thing for the longest time about that being ridicules until just recently when I re-watched TB and figured out that it was quite odious. Bond flew it up there after the funeral so that he could be there to meet Col. Bouvar when he returned home. Then having killed him, he flew it back to his car to make a speedy getaway. Still outlandish but if it were feasible, it would be 'very practical'.
  • To answer an above response, there's simply no way Connery could of continued until the end of the 1980s. For one, he was already tired and jaded of the franchise by 1967, and only came back again for a then record salary to play Bond again, which was merely a one off. He was never going to come back again, and even in Never Say Never Again which was merely a spoof and not official film, Connery was only having a bit of fun, and nobody took it seriously, even if he did look good for a man in his early 50's playing 'James Bond'

    Secondly, if he was out of it by Diamonds, imagine how further he could of deteriorated in subsequent releases throughout the 1970s. The bottom line is, Connery was one of the best Bonds ever, but his time was between 1962-65, what came after that was a disappointment. Connery just about saved himself by finally quitting the role in 1971, a bit later than should of been, but a near disaster was averted. Moore was more than suitable to replace in 1973, and if not for his Saint involvement, really should of been in place after Thunderball, and maybe to save Connery a measure of embarrassment
  • As much as I love Dalton- I can't help but wonder what it would have been like if Moore had stayed until Licence to Kill-- and that movie was done as if it was 'the last one'. Then Dalton or Pierce could still come in for the 90's
    At the very least, it would have been cool to see Moore work with his original Felix again and to try some new daring things (for his Bond)

    007nl_04.jpg

    ^Not my work

    As if seeing FYEO and OP back to back today on the big screen wasn't enough, this pic has just completed my night. I've heard of the possibilities of Moore in TLD but never LTK.
Sign In or Register to comment.