The James Bond Questions Thread

17273757778210

Comments

  • TokolosheTokoloshe Under your bed
    Posts: 2,667
    C is the acronym used by the actual head of the SIS, so it seems fairly accurate to use it for Denbigh's role here.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    Tokoloshe wrote: »
    C is the acronym used by the actual head of the SIS, so it seems fairly accurate to use it for Denbigh's role here.

    Fair enough. Except this is not explained in the film so the joe public are expected to know this already are they?

    I assumed maybe his job title was chief of something so I paid attention this time but it's not its joint head. The letter C has no context at all in the film or the world of Bond. The only reason Bond looks so smug is he's basically calling him a c**t to his face.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Tokoloshe wrote: »
    C is the acronym used by the actual head of the SIS, so it seems fairly accurate to use it for Denbigh's role here.
    I C.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    edited December 2015 Posts: 18,264
    I've only seen Spectre once so far but doesn't Denbigh say that he has the official title of C but he prefers to be known by his own name and then Bond says "I think I'll call you C" or words to that effect? I took it to be a reference to "c**t" too. Plus, as others have already noted, C is the official letter used for the real-world Head of MI6. It could be read as C wanting to take over from M and the Double-O Section with his "Nine Eyes" international spy organisation, making M and his agents effectively redundant. Sort of like the real-world impinging on the fantasy world of Bond. That's my best take on it anyhow (after just one viewing).
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Two SP related questions:

    1.) How does the hotel that Sciarra is meeting the other SPECTRE guys in blow up? Obviously Bond does a little shooting, but I never saw anything in the place that looked remotely explosive (not to mention his surprise when it does blow up), and the whole thing is over so quickly I didn't get a good look at any possibles source of it either of the two times I've seen it.

    2.) Sciarra's ring. How exactly did the DNA of Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva get on it? Are we supposed to believe that after Le Chiffre died Greene took his place, and after Greene's death Silva did the same, despite the massive multi-year gap between Greene's death and Silva's destruction/dismantling of M and MI6 long after? Then of course, Sciarra would've had to take over for Silva following his demise. This is the only thing that makes sense to me, but also doesn't feel at all sound in logic, especially considering Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva would've had those rings on in their respective movies, which they don't. This is partly why I'm critical of how EON and the writers have connected the past films in SP. It reeks of a retcon at moments like this and just doesn't "fit" when sometimes thought over. Anyone else curious about all this? The Quantum/SPECTRE connection isn't explained that thoroughly in the movie so a lot of this is up to interpretation. I just feel there was a better way to make Quantum and SPECTRE connected than this.

    What does this mean for the future, then? George Lucas-esque alterations to the Craig era so that Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva wear CGI SPECTRE rings in their movies? X_X
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    edited December 2015 Posts: 18,264
    On point 2 I'm with you all the way, Brady. That part of exposition (was it even that?!) was very badly written and handled, even though I liked Spectre on the whole. Desperately trying to retroactively connect all the dots with the previous films of the Craig era didn't really work for me - it was unsatisfying to say the least of it.
  • PropertyOfALadyPropertyOfALady Colders Federation CEO
    Posts: 3,675
    Two SP related questions:

    1.) How does the hotel that Sciarra is meeting the other SPECTRE guys in blow up? Obviously Bond does a little shooting, but I never saw anything in the place that looked remotely explosive (not to mention his surprise when it does blow up), and the whole thing is over so quickly I didn't get a good look at any possibles source of it either of the two times I've seen it.

    2.) Sciarra's ring. How exactly did the DNA of Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva get on it? Are we supposed to believe that after Le Chiffre died Greene took his place, and after Greene's death Silva did the same, despite the massive multi-year gap between Greene's death and Silva's destruction/dismantling of M and MI6 long after? Then of course, Sciarra would've had to take over for Silva following his demise. This is the only thing that makes sense to me, but also doesn't feel at all sound in logic, especially considering Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva would've had those rings on in their respective movies, which they don't. This is partly why I'm critical of how EON and the writers have connected the past films in SP. It reeks of a retcon at moments like this and just doesn't "fit" when sometimes thought over. Anyone else curious about all this? The Quantum/SPECTRE connection isn't explained that thoroughly in the movie so a lot of this is up to interpretation. I just feel there was a better way to make Quantum and SPECTRE connected than this.

    What does this mean for the future, then? George Lucas-esque alterations to the Craig era so that Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva wear CGI SPECTRE rings in their movies? X_X

    Question 1: Wasn't there a bomb in the suitcase? I always took it as that's what it was.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,575
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Here is a question. Am I the only one that pops on (often) here throughout their workday?

    @Birdleson

    I probably spend a great amount of time here through my workday. Actually, I spend more time here at work than I do at home.

  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    edited December 2015 Posts: 9,117
    Dragonpol wrote: »
    I've only seen Spectre once so far but doesn't Denbigh say that he has the official title of C but he prefers to be known by his own name

    Err no. He doesn't. And that's after 4 viewings.

    Sorry but this 'C is what the real life guy is called' might be ok for us fans on here but your average cinemagoer would not have a clue about that.

    Two SP related questions:

    1.) How does the hotel that Sciarra is meeting the other SPECTRE guys in blow up? Obviously Bond does a little shooting, but I never saw anything in the place that looked remotely explosive (not to mention his surprise when it does blow up), and the whole thing is over so quickly I didn't get a good look at any possibles source of it either of the two times I've seen it.

    2.) Sciarra's ring. How exactly did the DNA of Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva get on it? Are we supposed to believe that after Le Chiffre died Greene took his place, and after Greene's death Silva did the same, despite the massive multi-year gap between Greene's death and Silva's destruction/dismantling of M and MI6 long after? Then of course, Sciarra would've had to take over for Silva following his demise. This is the only thing that makes sense to me, but also doesn't feel at all sound in logic, especially considering Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva would've had those rings on in their respective movies, which they don't. This is partly why I'm critical of how EON and the writers have connected the past films in SP. It reeks of a retcon at moments like this and just doesn't "fit" when sometimes thought over. Anyone else curious about all this? The Quantum/SPECTRE connection isn't explained that thoroughly in the movie so a lot of this is up to interpretation. I just feel there was a better way to make Quantum and SPECTRE connected than this.

    What does this mean for the future, then? George Lucas-esque alterations to the Craig era so that Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva wear CGI SPECTRE rings in their movies? X_X

    1) There's a briefcase with the bomb in it which Bond shoots. More to the point how does Sciarra survive the massive blast? The moment it all kicks off he must have really scarpered quick smart and even then he's very lucky to get away.

    2) The ring is made of some rare metal (Zirconium or some such) traces of which were found on all three bodies. So it's not so much that there is DNA on Bond's ring more that all 3 show traces of the same rare metal in the post mortem.

    That it said it's taken me 4 viewings to get that far. It's astonishingly bad storytelling by Mendes. He's happy to waste 5 mins of screen time on some pretentious opening shot but this, which while not completely crucial is still an important plot point, is dealt with in a shot on Qs laptop that lasts less than 3 seconds.

    However there is some mention of Franz Oberhauser's DNA which I haven't been able to piece together yet. Maybe it's a cunning ruse by Mendes to get you to pay to see the film more times?

    If it reeks of a retcon it's because it is one. And a pretty hamfisted one at that.

    They invented Quantum because they didn't have the rights to SPECTRE then all of a sudden the fact that they did and no one remembers Quantum means they just want to airbrush it out of history.

    As far as I recall (apart from the little Q lapel badges) the only mention by name of Quantum is by Greene at the end. The rest of the time it's 'what is this shadowy organisation we know nothing about Bond?'

    Personally I think I'm going to ignore the existence if Quantum and pretend the shadowy organisation is SPECTRE. I just need to remember to cough every time during Greene's final speech.

    I always hated the fact they called it Quantum anyway just to try and make the title make sense to the average retards who go to the cinema when it actually referred to the small crumb of comfort that Bond and Camilla got from their revenge.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    edited December 2015 Posts: 7,546
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I just assumed he was referring to him as a cunt.

    Well clearly this is what he's alluding to and also M later but for that gag to work it also needs to mean sonething else.
    Denbigh was working for the CNS. Centre for National Security.

    So C stands for 'centre'? In any event I don't think M mentions CNS in that meeting with Bond, it's only later we hear about that.

    My initial thought; Bond called him "C" because he's the head of "CNS", indirectly telling Denbigh that "M" was called "M" because he's the head of "MI6", thereby using some misdirection to throw Denbigh off M's identity as a precaution because who the hell is this Denbigh guy, anyway.

    /overthinking it

  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    edited December 2015 Posts: 7,546
    Dragonpol wrote: »
    I've only seen Spectre once so far but doesn't Denbigh say that he has the official title of C but he prefers to be known by his own name

    Err no. He doesn't. And that's after 4 viewings.

    Sorry but this 'C is what the real life guy is called' might be ok for us fans on here but your average cinemagoer would not have a clue about that.

    Two SP related questions:

    1.) How does the hotel that Sciarra is meeting the other SPECTRE guys in blow up? Obviously Bond does a little shooting, but I never saw anything in the place that looked remotely explosive (not to mention his surprise when it does blow up), and the whole thing is over so quickly I didn't get a good look at any possibles source of it either of the two times I've seen it.

    2.) Sciarra's ring. How exactly did the DNA of Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva get on it? Are we supposed to believe that after Le Chiffre died Greene took his place, and after Greene's death Silva did the same, despite the massive multi-year gap between Greene's death and Silva's destruction/dismantling of M and MI6 long after? Then of course, Sciarra would've had to take over for Silva following his demise. This is the only thing that makes sense to me, but also doesn't feel at all sound in logic, especially considering Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva would've had those rings on in their respective movies, which they don't. This is partly why I'm critical of how EON and the writers have connected the past films in SP. It reeks of a retcon at moments like this and just doesn't "fit" when sometimes thought over. Anyone else curious about all this? The Quantum/SPECTRE connection isn't explained that thoroughly in the movie so a lot of this is up to interpretation. I just feel there was a better way to make Quantum and SPECTRE connected than this.

    What does this mean for the future, then? George Lucas-esque alterations to the Craig era so that Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva wear CGI SPECTRE rings in their movies? X_X

    1) There's a briefcase with the bomb in it which Bond shoots. More to the point how does Sciarra survive the massive blast? The moment it all kicks off he must have really scarpered quick smart and even then he's very lucky to get away.

    2) The ring is made of some rare metal (Zirconium or some such) traces of which were found on all three bodies. So it's not so much that there is DNA on Bond's ring more that all 3 show traces of the same rare metal in the post mortem.

    That it said it's taken me 4 viewings to get that far. It's astonishingly bad storytelling by Mendes. He's happy to waste 5 mins of screen time on some pretentious opening shot but this, which while not completely crucial is still an important plot point, is dealt with in a shot on Qs laptop that lasts less than 3 seconds.

    However there is some mention of Franz Oberhauser's DNA which I haven't been able to piece together yet. Maybe it's a cunning ruse by Mendes to get you to pay to see the film more times?

    If it reeks of a retcon it's because it is one. And a pretty hamfisted one at that.

    They invented Quantum because they didn't have the rights to SPECTRE then all of a sudden the fact that they did and no one remembers Quantum means they just want to airbrush it out of history.

    As far as I recall (apart from the little Q lapel badges) the only mention by name of Quantum is by Greene at the end. The rest of the time it's 'what is this shadowy organisation we know nothing about Bond?'

    Personally I think I'm going to ignore the existence if Quantum and pretend the shadowy organisation is SPECTRE. I just need to remember to cough every time during Greene's final speech.

    I always hated the fact they called it Quantum anyway just to try and make the title make sense to the average retards who go to the cinema when it actually referred to the small crumb of comfort that Bond and Camilla got from their revenge.

    Fair enough, but honestly, I'd rather watch that amazing opening sequence 100 times before watching a bunch of ring-science exposition.

    I know what you mean though. We could have had both.

    I think it's been said before, but Quantum works fine as a regional branch of Spectre, headed by No. 2, Mr. White. They should have just left it at that; they didn't need to re-explain Silva and Le Chiffre and all that, they did that just fine in their respective movies.

    There was a good deal of hamfistedness in Spectre really, but IMO it was still a great, tight Bond adventure, and I loved everything about Waltz/Oberhauser.

  • Posts: 1,970
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    Had Kevin McClory been able to remake Thunderball again as Warhead 2000 with Dalton in the role. Would that have been a success and tough competition for Brosnan and Eon? As it was with Moore & Eon with Connery making a rival Bond film.

    anyone?
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,264
    Sorry, I stand corrected, @TheWizardOfIce.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    Dragonpol wrote: »
    I stand corrected

    Said the man in the orthopaedic shoe!
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,575
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    Had Kevin McClory been able to remake Thunderball again as Warhead 2000 with Dalton in the role. Would that have been a success and tough competition for Brosnan and Eon? As it was with Moore & Eon with Connery making a rival Bond film.

    anyone?

    I don't think it would have. Dalton wasn't as popular as Connery.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,264
    Dragonpol wrote: »
    I stand corrected

    Said the man in the orthopaedic shoe!

    :))

    I'll be watching it for the second time later this week hopefully.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Dragonpol wrote: »
    I've only seen Spectre once so far but doesn't Denbigh say that he has the official title of C but he prefers to be known by his own name

    Err no. He doesn't. And that's after 4 viewings.

    Sorry but this 'C is what the real life guy is called' might be ok for us fans on here but your average cinemagoer would not have a clue about that.

    Two SP related questions:

    1.) How does the hotel that Sciarra is meeting the other SPECTRE guys in blow up? Obviously Bond does a little shooting, but I never saw anything in the place that looked remotely explosive (not to mention his surprise when it does blow up), and the whole thing is over so quickly I didn't get a good look at any possibles source of it either of the two times I've seen it.

    2.) Sciarra's ring. How exactly did the DNA of Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva get on it? Are we supposed to believe that after Le Chiffre died Greene took his place, and after Greene's death Silva did the same, despite the massive multi-year gap between Greene's death and Silva's destruction/dismantling of M and MI6 long after? Then of course, Sciarra would've had to take over for Silva following his demise. This is the only thing that makes sense to me, but also doesn't feel at all sound in logic, especially considering Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva would've had those rings on in their respective movies, which they don't. This is partly why I'm critical of how EON and the writers have connected the past films in SP. It reeks of a retcon at moments like this and just doesn't "fit" when sometimes thought over. Anyone else curious about all this? The Quantum/SPECTRE connection isn't explained that thoroughly in the movie so a lot of this is up to interpretation. I just feel there was a better way to make Quantum and SPECTRE connected than this.

    What does this mean for the future, then? George Lucas-esque alterations to the Craig era so that Le Chiffre, Greene and Silva wear CGI SPECTRE rings in their movies? X_X

    1) There's a briefcase with the bomb in it which Bond shoots. More to the point how does Sciarra survive the massive blast? The moment it all kicks off he must have really scarpered quick smart and even then he's very lucky to get away.

    2) The ring is made of some rare metal (Zirconium or some such) traces of which were found on all three bodies. So it's not so much that there is DNA on Bond's ring more that all 3 show traces of the same rare metal in the post mortem.

    That it said it's taken me 4 viewings to get that far. It's astonishingly bad storytelling by Mendes. He's happy to waste 5 mins of screen time on some pretentious opening shot but this, which while not completely crucial is still an important plot point, is dealt with in a shot on Qs laptop that lasts less than 3 seconds.

    However there is some mention of Franz Oberhauser's DNA which I haven't been able to piece together yet. Maybe it's a cunning ruse by Mendes to get you to pay to see the film more times?

    If it reeks of a retcon it's because it is one. And a pretty hamfisted one at that.

    They invented Quantum because they didn't have the rights to SPECTRE then all of a sudden the fact that they did and no one remembers Quantum means they just want to airbrush it out of history.

    As far as I recall (apart from the little Q lapel badges) the only mention by name of Quantum is by Greene at the end. The rest of the time it's 'what is this shadowy organisation we know nothing about Bond?'

    Personally I think I'm going to ignore the existence if Quantum and pretend the shadowy organisation is SPECTRE. I just need to remember to cough every time during Greene's final speech.

    I always hated the fact they called it Quantum anyway just to try and make the title make sense to the average retards who go to the cinema when it actually referred to the small crumb of comfort that Bond and Camilla got from their revenge.

    @TheWizardOfIce, thank heavens there was another reason for the ring/DNA matching. As you said, we get three seconds of looking at Q's laptop to interpret this for ourselves, which is beyond annoying when you don't have the leisure of rewinding and pausing.

    One of the big things I was excited about for this film was its tying up of Quantum, but it honestly could have been done so much better, and with so much more clarity.

    Even at this time, post SP's release, we don't know if Quantum was just a tentacle of SPECTRE that it used for specific kinds of missions or if it was another front to keep the intelligence agencies of the world looking at red herrings. We could've been clued into all this by White, but he's wasted for just one damn scene, which, though it was one I loved, could've been much more informational. And if we're all scratching our heads over this-a group considered clinically obsessed with 007-I can only imagine the experiences had by casual audiences, who probably had no memory of Quantum anyway.

    So much of the enjoyment in SP comes from knowing the past Craig films very well, and if you're just going blind into SP after seeing none of the other three, or if you haven't seen them for years, you miss so much of the momentum the film is picking up over time. It's all about Bond uncovering the source behind his past trials, and if those trials are foreign to you, what enjoyment can you get from the film beyond the action? I'm actually surprised that EON, Mendes and co. relied on so much of the past films to tell the story of this one, as it's very much for the fans as opposed to the collective casual moviegoing audience, who don't know White from Greene or Le Chiffre from even Silva. I wonder how familiar the memories of some critics are with the past films; that might explain their lukewarm responses.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,960
    @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7, your first question was rather funny to me because I just got finished posting in the thread about things you just noticed in Bond films, saying that I was probably the only one who had to see the movie four times before the light went off in my head and I realized that the reason the building detonates was because of the suitcase bomb.
  • Posts: 2,159
    In Spectre, Madeleine says she shot a man when she was a child... Mr White hid a beretta behind the bleach, or something like that.

    Later on, Oberhauser says he 'went to you house once and visited your father' or some such thing.

    Does that mean Madeleine shot at Oberhauser?
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,960
    @Mallory, I don't believe so. I think Swann admits that she shot the man as a child, which is why she doesn't like guns. After Oberhauser says that he saw her once as a child when she visited Mr. White at his house, she says she doesn't remember. Seems to be a coincidence, but I initially thought the same thing, as well.

    Of course, I could be wrong about her saying that she did indeed shoot him, and it could've been Oberhauser who visited, but I don't believe so.
  • Posts: 2,159
    @Creasy47 I think the 'I visited your father' line is a reference to Inglorious Basterds, which stars them both - so it could just be a throwaway line, but it does somewhat tie into what she says on the train.

    I think her uncomfortable body language suggests she may be somewhat 'coy' about remembering him. Perhaps she does, perhaps she doesn't.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,960
    Mallory wrote: »
    @Creasy47 I think the 'I visited your father' line is a reference to Inglorious Basterds, which stars them both - so it could just be a throwaway line, but it does somewhat tie into what she says on the train.

    I think her uncomfortable body language suggests she may be somewhat 'coy' about remembering him. Perhaps she does, perhaps she doesn't.

    That'd be very cool if it was a nod to 'Basterds'!

    I was thinking that, as well; perhaps she doesn't want to admit that she shot at him, since he's obviously unhinged and crazy and who knows what he'd do if she admitted it, even though I'm sure he knows it was her who did it (if, indeed, it is him she's talking about.)
  • Posts: 2,159
    @Creasy47

    It could have been a hangover from previous scripts. From what Ive read the relationship between Mr White and Oberhauser was much more developed, and especially as to the origins of Spectre (which I thought was really cool) but it would add that extra bit of depth if Oberhause was responsilbe for Swann/White's relationship as seen in the film.
  • Thunderball007Thunderball007 United States
    Posts: 306
    SPECTRE questions.

    SPECTRE meeting in Rome.

    What is the lady talking about with the "160,000" females in the leisure sector?

    What is meaning of the discussion about vaccines?
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,960
    I would've enjoyed seeing a much more fleshed out backstory between Oberhauser and White. I'm going to have to make a point of returning to the scripts and reading them to see how different the final film is.
  • Posts: 2,159
    SPECTRE questions.

    SPECTRE meeting in Rome.

    What is the lady talking about with the "160,000" females in the leisure sector?

    What is meaning of the discussion about vaccines?

    They're discussing the nefarious projects Spectre are undertaking, along with the Nine Eyes Initiative. Prostitution/Human Trafficing and fake medical drugs.
  • Thunderball007Thunderball007 United States
    Posts: 306
    Mallory wrote: »
    SPECTRE questions.

    SPECTRE meeting in Rome.

    What is the lady talking about with the "160,000" females in the leisure sector?

    What is meaning of the discussion about vaccines?

    They're discussing the nefarious projects Spectre are undertaking, along with the Nine Eyes Initiative. Prostitution/Human Trafficing and fake medical drugs.

    I thought of such, but I wasn't sure. Thank you a lot! :D
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    SPECTRE questions.

    SPECTRE meeting in Rome.

    What is the lady talking about with the "160,000" females in the leisure sector?

    What is meaning of the discussion about vaccines?

    It seemed fairly straightforward to me.

    SPECTRE is responsible for trafficking 160,00 girls into prostitution and knocked out some dodgy vaccines which didn't do the job.

    Would've been a nice touch for me a la the Great Train Robbery reference in TB if they had mentioned 'our consultation fee to FIFA for the World Cup going to Qatar'.

    A cameo by Blatter sitting round the SPECTRE table would've been priceless!
  • Thunderball007Thunderball007 United States
    edited December 2015 Posts: 306
    SPECTRE questions.

    SPECTRE meeting in Rome.

    What is the lady talking about with the "160,000" females in the leisure sector?

    What is meaning of the discussion about vaccines?

    It seemed fairly straightforward to me.

    SPECTRE is responsible for trafficking 160,00 girls into prostitution and knocked out some dodgy vaccines which didn't do the job.

    Would've been a nice touch for me a la the Great Train Robbery reference in TB if they had mentioned 'our consultation fee to FIFA for the World Cup going to Qatar'.

    A cameo by Blatter sitting round the SPECTRE table would've been priceless!


    Yeah, thought so. Lol!

    How could Oberhauser think of himself as a "visionary" and making "beauty" from tragedy, with his organization involved in horrible projects such as trafficking and prostitution?

    I guess, Oberhauser is insane?? :p
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,264
    SPECTRE questions.

    SPECTRE meeting in Rome.

    What is the lady talking about with the "160,000" females in the leisure sector?

    What is meaning of the discussion about vaccines?

    It seemed fairly straightforward to me.

    SPECTRE is responsible for trafficking 160,00 girls into prostitution and knocked out some dodgy vaccines which didn't do the job.

    Would've been a nice touch for me a la the Great Train Robbery reference in TB if they had mentioned 'our consultation fee to FIFA for the World Cup going to Qatar'.

    A cameo by Blatter sitting round the SPECTRE table would've been priceless!

    Did anyone else besides me get a The Third Man vibe off that part?
Sign In or Register to comment.