It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
You're right, and what a poor decision, especially when you consider the ease with which they could have done this. I understand the trouble with Bond movies from Dr. No through about The Spy Who Loved Me or so, but GoldenEye was made in 1995, and most if not all of the actors are still living to this day.
I'm certainly not going to put all my marbles on IMDB, no way! It's just a semi-likely possibility, maybe. Hahaha, nothing definite for sure!
That was incredibly dumb the way they fixed the appearances of Trevelyan, Ourumov, Onatopp, Zukovsky, and especially Dimitri Mishkin, who looks like a loser instead of the chilling man in charge of Russian interrogations from 1995.
That's what I expect a game remake like this to be. Same game, updated graphics, so we can play the old GE on new consoles. Halo got it right.
The IMDB cast list thing is not 100% positive by any means, because as long as you're a member on there I believe you can edit the page, so I wouldn't trust that rumor just yet! Still though, if these two are going to be included, then you're right, that only leaves Brosnan's movie to be revealed. I seriously hope it is either Tomorrow Never Dies or Die Another Day!
goldfinger might start with alot of stealthing. i guess Gert Fröbe is out though, a re-imagining like Blofeld?
That then isn't a remake, it's a port. Halo Anniversary also added things, it wasn't just an upgrade.
Halo added things, but the campaign was basically the same, you could even switch back to the old graphics. Some added things would be good, like extra weapons and stuff, but I'd like the overall gameplay and level design to be the same as the original instead of a cheap Call Of Duty knock off.
i wish some more interesting swtuff wuld get detailed about legends so we could get inot it more
activision. video game rapists
I agree with a majority of this. A part of me really wants to give the game a shot, but how it's looking thus far, on top of how horrendous 'GE: Reloaded' was, I don't think I can shell out the money for it. Maybe half a year after its release, when it's much cheaper and lots of reviews and opinions are out on it, then I may give it a shot.
Also, anybody wanting Reloaded, cheap: Used on Amazon. I snagged mine for $20, while Gamestop's still selling it for $40.
I would debate if people were playing it based on the power of the goldeneye name. alot of people i met in there didn't have previous activision bond game history.
one guy explained to me how single player had pissed him off as he could not figure out what to do when he woke up in the helicopter....
from this i fell more or less that the game sold well much like CoD people bought it due to hype but the game itself was a rail shooter that had been taken off the rails.
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3655/missing-in-action#Item_1
I wonder if they had of gone with the lesser known guy if the money would be going into development instead of into daniel craigs pocket. i have no real problem with craig in the films but as a game commodity i feel he eats money
I never believed the whole two games thing anyway. I honestly think Activision learned their lesson with GE and Blood Stone. They'll never do two games at a time again.
I don't see this game being any longer than GoldenEye (which can last a good 7-8 hours, pretty long for a FPS).
How did you find this out? I sure hope not, because now it leads me to believe the films will get barely any screen time individually.