It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Hahah, i don't doubt of that. Still Hitman Games are even cooler than Activision's 007.
ANOTHER Question. If Bond is REMEMBERING, surely the missions should take place right at the time! They've updated the missions to nowadays. License to Kill is from 80's, it shoulda happen in the 80's, not 2009 or something like this. That's crap, i won't even play this.
Yes the Hitman games are much Better than Activision's 007. (They should make Bond games like Hitman.)
I don't much care for the timeline seeing as the timeline is an alternate Bond universe. I'm still going to get this game because I've wanted to play Some of these missions in a game form for a very long time.
At least you'll have a taste of what Bond felt in those missions.
The problem with that being that the current Bond has an established birthdate, which is after 1962. Setting these missions in their original times would basically be establishing that, after all the trouble EON went through to make us certain this is a reboot and a different Bond, he'd still be the same Bond we've been seeing since 1962.
Oooooh, Right.
DAD and 'original' in the same sentence? =)) I kid...or do I? /:)
Is Skyfall that far apart from the end of QoS?
I would say it is because the movies take place in present time
Different Bond. Like The Sinatra Danny Ocean is different from the Cloony Danny Ocean.
But it IS Dan's Bond.
Yeah, I don't understand some people's obsession with this overall chronology of Bond. The more films come out, the more insane people will drive themselves. There isn't a single chronology, it's splintered all over the place.
Some of us, though, like chronology and continuity. There's nothing wrong with either liking it or not.
OHMSS: Bond gets married, is replaced by another actor for the first time
License to Kill: Bond goes rogue
Die Another Day: Bond goes CGI megafest
Mission 5 (presumed to be Goldfinger)
Skyfall: Bond's assassination attempt by MI6
Controversial, what'choo talkin' 'bout, Canadian?
Its not that we want chronology its that Brady does not understand that Casino Royale was the first bond book and all the other missions happened after it...they did the same thing in the reboot with Craig but they made it into a 2 part movie(QOS). What the game will be is that they are trying to tell us that CRAIG IS BOND for now and that after his first mission he had a lot of others...(monnraker, DAD, etc.). And he also now had the new "mission" Skyfall. Im not saying the missions as they announced them will be in "chronological" order im just saying that now that Craig is the new Bond (REBOTED THE SERIES IN 2006) that after CR and QOS he had these missions, including Skyfall...If anybody dosent understand just ask :D :D :D
You're right. I just find it funny/odd when people get their knickers in a twist over a chronology they've formed in their own head.
Hey why dont u read my last comment? :-* its all fact btw....
Okay... Some things I have to say.
1) QOS is a direct sequel, not a second part. EON didn't make both CR and QOS at the same time and then split them up (and if they did, damn them for making us wait two years for what they already had filmed).
2) We all understand that Craig is Bond, who doesn't understand that?
3) I'm hoping we all understand that Bond had assignments between QOS and Skyfall. It's a little difficult for me to believe (even when bringing these past missions into the present) that Craig's Bond had 50 years of experience in 4 years, but if that's EON's feeling, I guess I can accept it.
4) I actually don't have a 4, I just didn't want to end at 3.