It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I'm sorry, but John Woo saved MI2 from being the total disaster it would have been had they just stuck to the story. At least there are some exciting visuals thanks to Woo.
Goldfinger had hotter girls and better visuals but as weak a story as MI2 though to be fair i haven't seen it since 2000 and I own it on dvd.
Yes, in fact you could say one of them was quite... golden (imitating Dr. Evil).
Other than Fort Knox, Goldfinger just looked bland to me. MI2 had laboratories, the villain's ending bunker and the final fight was in an area that fit it very well. Plus, how can you get past climbing the Grand Canyon at the beginning?
Anyway the recreation of the environments for 007 Legends look great. I wonder what the outside of the Moonraker space station will look like. Piz Gloria gives me a Star Wars battlefront vibe. I want to see More of Licence to Kill, so far they have only showed Sanchez's drug lab. Die Another Day seems to have had the most shown.
Weirder sh*t has happened.
I just want to see more of all the environments. This close to release, we had more info on GE2010, Blood Stone and Reloaded, but we keep getting so damn little about 007 Legends, it's angering me.
I think there doing it to build hype, but also keep it a surprise at the same time.
They make it seem as though Craig's not voicing himself.
dry your eyes.
I've never seen anyone use the word "journos" and have little idea what it could mean (possibly 'journalists', based on the context). As far as 'chievos' goes, I've gone on record across many sites stating how stupid that word is ('Achievements' isn't that hard to say, f*cking internet morons). What do you mean, exactly, by 'dry your eyes'?
dry up and blow away. the article was a pile of crap, they know no more than us was all I said. You sir are the 'Internet moron'.
I never, in any way, defended the article. I was, however, commenting on the terminology you used. Am I an internet moron simply because I refuse to use the half-assed slang that has, for some reason, become acceptable?
I would desist now and allow the chat to return to the question in hand and avoid posting appendix articles which bring nothing but debate to how good or bad the journalism is.
If you find some posts to be 'half-assed' then ignore them in future. This is a public board, not your dictatorship.
Revert topic to 007 Legends
Please, @oo7, avoid such pointless expressions. You are both clearly arguing against nothing, in essence agreeing for the most part, yet feeling mutually attacked surprisingly enough. However, the one who resorts to downright insulting another member, is by all means the weaker participant in the debate. This mustn't go on any longer, let's agree on that.
As for the Internet slang, in a personal note I can say that I find it detestable. Using practical abbreviations such as 'IMO' or 'iirc' can be perfectly justified I feel. Creating new vocabulary in full Clockwork Orange style, however, can only lead to confusion and misunderstandings, as well as to the user of such vocabulary to come off as intellectually pretentious. If you're going to type more than 4 letters anyway, you might as well type the original word. The English language is a beautiful one; no need to start condensing it at random. Friends of mine have tried to impose Internet slang on me, unsuccessfully I might add. I left the conversation immediately, stating very clearly that I might as well try to discuss the Grand Unified Theory with a drunk if the whole point is to create a babylonian speech confusion.
And yes, let's get back on topic now.
Merely threw it back in quotations.